Cases

(2007) Carter BRYANT, Plaintiff, v. MATTEL, INC., Defendant. and Consolidated Actions. Nos. CV 04-09049 SGL, CV 04-09059 SGL, CV 05-02727 SGL. United States District Court, C.D. California. June 27, 2007. ORDER RE MOTIONS HEARD ON JUNE 11, 2007 STEPHEN G. LARSON, District Judge. Presently before the Court is a multitude of motions filed by a

441 F.Supp.2d 1081 (2005) MATTEL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. Carter BRYANT, an individual; and Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendant. And Related Counterclaims No. CV 04-9059 NM (RNBX). United States District Court, C.D. California. March 4, 2005. *1082 *1083

NOONAN, Circuit Judge. Mattel, Inc., a Delaware corporation with headquarters in California, appeals the order of the district court denying Mattel’s motion to remand this action to state court in which Mattel had begun this suit against Carter Bryant, a resident of Missouri and a product designer formerly in its employ. Holding that diversity jurisdiction is not defeated by t

801 F.Supp.2d 950 (2011) MATTEL, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC., et al., Defendants. and Consolidated Actions. Case No. CV 04-9049 DOC (RNBx). United States District Court, C.D. California. August 4, 2011. *952 David M. Stern, Kevin E. Deenihan, Matthew C. Heyn, Klee Tuchin Bogdanoff & Stern LLP, Joh

616 F.3d 904 (2010) MATTEL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant-counter-claimant-Appellee, v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; MGA Entertainment (HK) Limited, a Hong Kong Special Administrative Region business entity; Isaac Larian, an individual, Counter-defendants-Appellants, Carter Bryant, an individual, Plaintiff-counter-defendant, *905 Carlos Gustavo Machado Gomez, an individual; MGAE de Mexico, S.R.L

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MATTEL, INC.,  No. 05-55696 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v.  CV-04-09059- CARTER BRYANT, AN INDIVIDUAL, ET NMM/RNB AL.; MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC., OPINION Defendants-Appellees.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MATTEL, INC., a Delaware  corporation, Defendant-counter-claimant- Appellee, v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; MGA ENTERTAINMENT (HK) LIMITED, a Hong Kong Special Administrative Region business entity; ISAAC LARIAN, an individual, No. 09-55673 Counter-defendants-Appellants, CARTER BRYANT, an individual, 

MEMORANDUM * “The filing of a notice of appeal is an event of jurisdictional significance — it confers jurisdiction on the court of appeals and divests the district court of its control over those aspects of the case involved in the appeal.” Griggs v. Provident Consumer Disc. Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58, 103 S.Ct. 400, 74 L.Ed.2d 225 (1982) (per curiam). The district court’s judgment determined the entire

782 F.Supp.2d 911 (2011) MATTEL, INC., v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC., and Consolidated Actions. Case No. CV 04-9049 DOC (RNBx). United States District Court, C.D. California. January 5, 2011. *940 David M. Stern, Kevin E. Deenihan, Matthew C. Heyn, Klee Tuchin Bogdanoff & Stern LLP, John B. Quinn, Randa A.F. Osman, Rory S. Mille

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MATTEL, INC., a Delaware  corporation, Defendant-counter-claimant- Appellee, v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; MGA ENTERTAINMENT (HK) LIMITED, a Hong Kong Special Administrative Region business entity; ISAAC LARIAN, an individual, No. 09-55673 Counter-defendants-Appellants, CARTER BRYANT, an individual, 

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MATTEL, INC., a Delaware  corporation, Defendant-counter-claimant- Appellee, v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; MGA ENTERTAINMENT (HK) LIMITED, a Hong Kong Special Administrative Region business entity; ISAAC LARIAN, an individual, No. 09-55673 Counter-defendants-Appellants, CARTER BRYANT, an individual, 

290 F.Supp. 735 (1968) CARTER-WALLACE, INC., Plaintiff, v. EVER-DRY CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 67 Civ. 4170. United States District Court S. D. New York. August 8, 1968. *736 von Maltitz, Derenberg, Kunin & Janssen, New York City, for plaintiff. Shenier & O'Connor, New York City, for defendant. MANSFIELD, D

OPINION AND ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The Brooklyn photographer Bernard Belair brings this action against the California corporation MGA Entertainment, Inc., alleging that MGA’s Bratz line of dolls unlawfully infringes on a copyrighted image that he created for a Steve Madden shoe advertisement. MGA has moved for summary judgment. Because no reas

OPINION AND ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION Lexington Insurance Company (“Lexington”), National Union Fire Insurance *542Company of Pittsburgh, PA (“National Union”), American International Underwriters Insurance Company (“AIU”), and Chartis Specialty Insurance Company (“Chartis”) (collectiv

*65Justice Scalia delivered the opinion of the Court. We consider whether, under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA or Act), 9 U. S. C. §§ 1-16, a district court may decide a claim that an arbitration agreement is unconscionable, where the agreement explicitly assigns that decision to the arbitrator. I On February 1, 20

ACCEPTED 04-14-00829-cv 04-14-00829-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AMEENA BROWN and EVAN ) BRAGGS, Individually and as ) Co-Administrators of the Estate of ) A.B., deceased, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) C.A. No.: N20C-01-067 FJJ v. ) ) FISHER-PRICE, INC. and ) MATTEL, INC.,

JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Nambe Pueblo Development Corporation's1 Motion to Dismiss, filed October 1, 2018 (Doc. 14)("Motion"). The Court held a hearing on December 21, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the case, wherein Plaintiff World Fuel Services, Inc. -- a non

Opinion after Bench Trial RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, District Judge. Plaintiff Merck & Cie (“Merck”), formerly known as Merck Eprova AG, a producer of pharmaceutical and dietary ingredients, brings this action against Defendant Acella Pharmaceuticals LLC (“Acella”), formerly known as Brookstone Pharmaceuticals LLC, a corporation that develops, markets, and sells low-cost vitamins and nutritional suppl

724 S.E.2d 250 (2011) Clayton BROWN, as guardian for and on behalf of Clarence BROWN, Plaintiff Below, Appellant v. GENESIS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION; Genesis Healthcare Holding Company II, Inc.; Genesis Health Ventures, Inc. of West Virginia; Genesis Eldercare Corporation; Genesis Eldercare Network Services, Inc.; Genesis Eldercare Management Services, Inc.; Genesis Eldercare Rehabilitation Services, Inc.; Genesis Eldercare Staffing Services, Inc.;