Cases

ORDER RICHARD MARK GERGEL, District Judge. Plaintiff filed this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiffs application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 73.02, D.S.C., this matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Joseph R. McCrorey for pretrial handling.

CARROLL, Judge, dissenting: Because the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) rejection of Barnard’s treating physician’s opinion and adverse credibility findings of Barnard and her husband were error, I respectfully dissent. Rejection of Treating Physician’s Opinion The Majority finds that the ALJ’s rejection of the treating physician’s opinion was supported by

ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney’s Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act and the Social Security Act [Doc. 21] and Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney’s Fees under the Social Security Act [Doc. 26]. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On October 22, 2010, this matter was remanded to the Social

ED CARNES, Chief Judge: Sonya Hunter appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for remand and affirming the Social Security Commissioner’s final decision to deny her application for disability insurance benefits. Hunter contends that the district court should have remanded the case to the Commissioner for further proceedin

AMENDED ORDER FEUERSTEIN, District Judge. Richard Henningsen (“plaintiff’ or “claimant” or “Henningsen”) commenced this action pursuant, to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of the final determination of defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration (“Commissioner” or “defendant”) denying his November 29, 2010 application for disability benefits. Now before the Court is defenda

OPINION WEIS, Circuit Judge. Claimant was injured in 1990 while working as a construction-laborer. Over the ensuing years, a number of physicians treated and examined him. In some instances, the doctors’ reports are inconsistent. Some opined that claimant could have returned to work years ago, although others found disability. The District Court remanded the case to the Appeals

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. The Plaintiff Karen Anne Miller (“Miller” or the “Plaintiff’) seeks review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) that she was not disabled during the relevant time periods and, therefore, she was not entitled to disability benefits on her own earnings record or disabled widows’ benefits as provided for in T

OPINION MERRITT, Circuit Judge. Ricky Lee Smith filed an application for supplemental security income resulting from disability. A hearing was conducted before an administrative law judge (“ALJ”). The ALJ issued an unfavorable decision, finding that Smith was not disabled under the Social Security Act. The notice of.decision stated that Smith had sixty d

OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff Darren Trancynger brings this action to review the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, finding that Trancynger was not disabled and thus not eligible for disability insurance1 benefits. Trancynger seeks to have the case remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings. See

OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff Anthony Heitz brings this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) challenging the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision to deny his claim for disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act (“SSA”). On October 22, 2015, Heitz moved for judgment on the pleadings. See Notice of Motion for Judgment on t

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OLLIE CARROLL, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-391 (TJK/GMH) ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey on Ja

DECISION AND ORDER WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, District Judge: Plaintiff Vincent Marinello (“Plaintiff’) brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. *591§§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3), alleging that Defendant, the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”), improperly denied Plaintiffs request for Social Security disability benefits and/or Su

OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Marco Puente brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to obtain judicial review of the- final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his claim for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under the Social Security Act. Puente has moved for judgment on the pleadings pur

OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Valerie Evans brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to obtain judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her claim for disability benefits under the Social Security Act. Evans has moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c

OPINION AND ORDER FRANK MAAS, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Kathy Jo Simmons (“Simmons”) brings this action pursuant to Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act (“Act”), as amended; 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for disability insurance benefits. The parties have filed cross-motio

704 F.Supp.2d 1200 (2010) David CARROLL, Plaintiff, v. LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC and The Lans Benefit and Investment Committee, Defendant. No. CIV 08-0959 JB/ACT. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. March 20, 2010. *1201 Michael E. Mozes, Law Offices of Michael E. Mozes, P.C., Albuquerque, NM, for Plaintiff.

ROGERS, Circuit Judge. Kevin Smith suffers from psychiatric illness aggravated by substance abuse. He was denied Social Security disability benefits because, although he is disabled, his substance abuse contributed to the disability, and without the substance abuse he would not meet the requirements for disability. The magistrate judge upheld the agency’s decision, and the district court upheld the magistrate’s decision, rej

SCHALL, Circuit Judge. Rokki Knee Carr petitions for review of the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) authorizing the Social Security Administration (“SSA” or “agency”) to remove her from her position as an administrative law judge (“ALJ”). Social Security Administration v. Carr, 78 M.S.P.R. 313 (1998). We affirm.

24-644 Carroll v. Trump UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 29th day of April, two thousand twenty-six. Present: DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Chief Judge, RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR., RICHARD J. SULLIVA

OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Darryl Collins, proceeding pro se, brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to obtain judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his claim for disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. The Commissioner has moved for judgment on the ple