Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Carroll v. Gilbert”
Carroll v. Gilbertpublic domain
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Campbell v. Salman, 384 So.2d 1331 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Hardcastle v. Mobley, 143 So.2d 715 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962).
State v. Gilbertpublic domain
BROWN, Chief Judge. 11Defendant, Donte Lashon Gilbert, Jr., pled guilty on June 25, 2013, to one count of aggravated flight from an officer, a violation of La. R.S. 14:108.1. He was sentenced to serve 18 months at hard labor, and a $500 fine was imposed, together with court costs, or 60 days in jail in lieu of payment. Defendant appeals his sentence as excessive. The sentence is amended to remove that portion which imposed
Carroll v. Stettlerpublic domain
MEMORANDUM McLAUGHLIN, District Judge. This lawsuit concerns monies that were transferred to defendants as part of a Ponzi scheme operated by a third party, Lizette Morice. The plaintiffs, who lost their investments in the fraudulent scheme, seek the voidance of these transfers under the Pennsylvania Uniform Fraudulent Trans*575fer Act a
United States v. Carrollpublic domain
667 F.3d 742 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Krispen S. CARROLL; David W. Ruskin; Tammy L. Terry; Thomas W. McDonald; Carl L. Bekofske, Defendants-Appellants. No. 10-1400. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: November 16, 2011. Decided and Filed: January 30, 2012. *743 AR
Gilbert v. Gilbertpublic domain
PITTMAN, Judge. Kevin Gilbert (“the father”) appeals from the Walker Circuit Court’s denial by operation of law of his motion to set aside a default judgment that had been entered in favor of Brandy Nicole Gilbert (“the mother”). Pursuant to the default judgment, the trial court transferred custody of the parties’ minor child (“the child”) from the father to the mother. We reverse the denial of the father’s motion to set asi
Carroll v. Gilbertpublic domain
Opinion by Davidson, J. § 266. Certiorari; petition for writ of, held sufficient. This cause of action was instituted by appellant in the justice court to recover a bale of cotton, where appellee recovered judgment therefor. Appellant filed his petition for a writ of certiorari, and it was, on motion of appellee, dismissed from the county court. Various errors were assigned to the action of the co
Delvin C. Payton v. County of Carrollpublic domain
WOOD, Circuit Judge. When a person is arrested in Illinois, he or she is arraigned, and when possible, the court releases the detainee either on bail or on personal recognizance. See Illinois Bond Statute, 725 ILCS 5/110-2 (own recognizance); 5/110-4 (bailable offenses). (In People v. Purcell, 201 Ill.2d 542, 268 Ill.Dec. 429, 778 N.E.2d 695 (2002), the Illin
Gilbert v. Gilbert Timber Co.public domain
Steele Hays, Justice. In this appeal of a workers’ compensation case the Court of Appeals affirmed the Workers’ Compensation Commission and we granted a petition for review of that decision. Appellant Carroll Gilbert is the owner of Gilbert Timber Company and was injured when struck by a falling tree limb. At the time of the injury a workers’ compensation policy issued by C
David Carroll v. Todd Fosterpublic domain
04/25/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 9, 2024 DAVID CARROLL v. TODD FOSTER Appeal from the Chancery Court for Unicoi County No. 8277 Suzanne S. Cook, Judge1
Gilbert v. Gilbert Timber Co.public domain
George K. Cracraft, Chief Judge, concurring. I would deny the petition for rehearing because I think that the result reached in the original opinion was correct. As originally enacted, our statute defined “employees” as those persons “employed in the service of an employer under any contract of hire or apprenticeship. . . .” See Ark. Stat. Ann. § 81-1302(b) (Repl. 1976). T
Ryan Carroll v. Jennifer C. Bursteinpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RYAN CARROLL, on behalf of himself 1 and all similarly situated stockholders of STOKE THERAPEUTICS, INC., Plaintiff, v. C.A. No. 2024-0317-LWW JENNIFER C. BURSTEIN, SETH L. HARRISON, EDWARD M. KAYE, ADRIAN KRAINER, ARTHUR A. LEVIN, GARRY E. MENZEL, JULIE ANNE SMITH, IAN F. SMITH, ARTHUR TZIANABOS, and STOKE THERAPEUTICS, INC., Defendants.
Gilbert C. Garza AKA Gilbert Lara Garza v. Statepublic domain
NUMBERS 13-17-00677-CR, 13-17-00678-CR, AND 13-17-00679-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG GILBERT C. GARZA AKA GILBERT LARA GARZA, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Gilbert v. Derwinskipublic domain
FARLEY, Associate Judge, filed the opinion of the Court, in which NEBEKER, Chief Judge, joined. KRAMER, Associate Judge, filed a concurring opinion. FARLEY, Associate Judge: This case presents the Court with its first occasion to consider three statutory provisions of Title 38, United States Code, and their interrelationship. Section 4061(a)(4) provides that the Court may set aside a f
Gilbert v. Derwinskipublic domain
PER CURIAM. NEBEKER, Chief Judge, concurring, filed separately. MEMORANDUM DECISION PER CURIAM: On October 12, 1990, this case was remanded to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7252(a) (formerly § 4052(a)) to provide “reasons or bases” in accordance with 38 U.S.C. § 7104(d)(1) (formerly § 4004(d)(1)) and for an explanation why the veteran was not entitled to
Moses Gilbert Rodriguez v. Statepublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-18-00400-CR __________________ MOSES GILBERT RODRIGUEZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _________________________________________________
People ex rel. Carroll v. Russipublic domain
—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Rosen, J.), entered August 21, 1995, which denied petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing. Petitioner’s parole was revoked in May 1995 for violating the conditions thereof which mandated his compliance with curfew restrictions and prohibited his presence in establishments serving alcoholic beverages. Pe
Carroll v. Hokepublic domain
695 F.Supp. 1435 (1988) Gilbert G. CARROLL, Petitioner, v. Robert HOKE, Warden of Eastern Correctional Facility, Respondent. No. CV 88-1065. United States District Court, E.D. New York. October 4, 1988. *1436 Gilbert G. Carroll, Napanoch, N.Y., pro se. Patrick Henry, Suffolk County Dist. Atty. by Arthur Scheuermann, Riverh
In re Gilbertpublic domain
ORDER James R. Sacca, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge This case involves the interplay between §§ 541(a)(5) and 1306(a)(1) to determine whether a post-confirmation inheritance is property of the estate in this Chapter 13 case. Courts have reached two opposite conclusions despite all agreeing that the language of these statutes is clear and what rules of statutory construction apply. What they do not agree on
Carroll v. Statepublic domain
WINDOM, Presiding Judge. Taurus Jermaine Carroll appeals his two capital-murder convictions and sentences of death. Carroll was convicted of one count of murder made capital for intentionally taking the life of Michael Turner after having been convicted of another murder within the preceding 20 years, see § 13A-5-40(a)(13), Ala.Code 1975, and a second count of murder made capital for intentionally taking the life of
Tapia, Gilbert Jr.public domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0729-14 GILBERT TAPIA, JR., Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS BEE COUNTY R ICHARDSON, J.