Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Carrie Steigerwalt”
Heritage Way Properties, L.L.C. v. Disbennettpublic domain
[Cite as Heritage Way Properties, L.L.C. v. Disbennett, 2011-Ohio-2004.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ROSS COUNTY HERITAGE WAY PROPERTIES, LLC, : : Plaintiff-Appellee, : : Case No. 10CA3190 v. :
People v. Garciapublic domain
168 Cal.App.4th 261 (2008) THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. PEDRO ALEXANDER ZEPEDA GARCIA et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. D049650. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One. November 14, 2008. As modified November 24, 2008. *268 Doris M. Frizzell, under appointment by the Court
Allentown Supply Co. v. McCurdy (In Re McCurdy)public domain
45 B.R. 728 (1985) In re Alexander C. McCURDY and Joyce E. McCurdy, Debtors. ALLENTOWN SUPPLY COMPANY, t/a Asco Fuels, Penn Air & Heat, Inc. and Harry P. Creveling, Plaintiffs, v. Alexander C. McCURDY, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 5-83-00129, Adv. No. 5-83-0359. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. January 16, 1985. *
People v. Silverpublic domain
OPINION The People appeal the order setting aside an information charging Wyatt Silver with assault by a prisoner likely to cause great bodily injury (Pen. Code,1 § 4501). On May 13, 1994, the People filed a complaint in Imperial County charging Silver with assault by a prisoner likely to cause great bodily injury. When correctional officer Sergeant Mason testified at the preliminary hearing, the following collo
Filed 12/15/20 Opinion on remand from Supreme Court CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR TOD HIPSHER, B276486 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BS153372) v. LOS ANGELES
In re Hillpublic domain
Opinion McDONALD, J. Following a jury trial, Philip Hill was convicted of 23 counts of sexual offenses committed against two minors. In this petition for writ of habeas corpus (which we consider with his appeal on a different ground), Hill contends his convictions must be reversed because he was denied his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel. He asserts his trial counsel did not properly inv
Belk-James, Inc. v. Nuzumpublic domain
358 So.2d 174 (1978) BELK-JAMES, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. Charles A. NUZUM, Director, Division of Beverage, Department of Business Regulation, State of Florida, Beer Industry of Florida, Inc., and Adoph Coors Company, Appellees. No. 50881. Supreme Court of Florida. March 9, 1978. Rehearing Denied May 22, 1978.
Toledo Blade Co. v. Shinew (In Re Shinew)public domain
33 B.R. 588 (1983) In re Jerry Ralph SHINEW, Debtor. The TOLEDO BLADE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Jerry Ralph SHINEW, Defendant. Bankruptcy Nos. 82-0205, 82-0340, Related Case: 81-02705. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio, W.D. September 23, 1983. *589 Louis J. Hattner, Toledo, Ohio, for plaintiff. James F. Shemas, J
In Re Trasylol Products Liability Litigationpublic domain
709 F.Supp.2d 1323 (2010) In re TRASYLOL PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL-1928. This Document Relates To: All Actions. Case No. 08-MD-01928. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. April 27, 2010. *1324 Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt Johnson Osborne & LeClainche, John Scarola, Brenda S. Fulmer, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart &am;
Schanbacker Estatepublic domain
SATTERTHWAITE, P. J., The first and final account of Bucks County Bank and Trust Company, executor of the estate of said decedent, was presented to the court for audit, confirmation and distribution of ascertained balances on June 5,1972, as advertised according to law. Due proof of appropriate notice thereof to all parties legally interested in said estate appears in the record. Said account has been examined and
Ganunis v. Ganunispublic domain
201 Pa. Superior Ct. 222 (1963) Ganunis, Appellant, v. Ganunis. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued March 21, 1963. June 12, 1963. Before RHODES, P.J., ERVIN, WRIGHT, WOODSIDE, MONTGOMERY, and FLOOD, JJ. (WATKINS, J., absent). *223 William D. Balitas, for appellant. Leon H. Kline, with him Isador
Manduley v. Superior Courtpublic domain
117 Cal.Rptr.2d 168 (2002) 41 P.3d 3 27 Cal.4th 537 Morgan Victor MANDULEY et al., Petitioners, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of San Diego County, Respondent. The People, Real Party in Interest. Michael Rose et al., Petitioners, v. The Superior Court of San Diego County, Respondent. The People, Real Party in Interest. No. S095992. Supreme Cour
Lemieux v. American Universal Insurance Co.public domain
360 A.2d 540 (1976) J. Gerard LEMIEUX v. AMERICAN UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY. No. 75-11 Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. July 23, 1976. *541 John F. Cuzzone, Jr., Quinn, Cuzzone & Geremia, Providence, for plaintiff. Eugene V. Higgins, Providence, for defendant. OPINION PAOLINO, Justice.</
Taylor v. Grosspublic domain
195 Pa. Superior Ct. 225 (1961) Taylor, Appellant, v. Gross. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued April 12, 1961. June 15, 1961. *226 Before ERVIN, WRIGHT, WOODSIDE, WATKINS, MONTGOMERY, and FLOOD, JJ. (RHODES, P.J., absent). Ralph J. McAllister, with him Avra N. Pershing, Jr., and McAllister & McAll
Hornig v. Hornigpublic domain
Argued November 9, 1936. These were two separate actions against Adam Hornig, *Page 502 brought to recover damages for malicious prosecution, one by Elizabeth S. Hornig, and the other by Adam B. Hornig, by his mother and next friend, the said Elizabeth S. Hornig. The two cases were tried together, resulting in verdicts for the respective plaintiffs, the first one in the sum of $200 and the other in the sum of $300. Defendant appealed in each case.
Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. Forsterpublic domain
This appeal involves a dispute between opposite abutting property owners over the use of a portion of an unopened city street. In 1907 one William R. Haggart became owner of a tract of land lying south of Gates Street, in Roxborough, Philadelphia. Crossing this tract and intersecting Gates Street at right angles was Shalkop Street, which since 1885 has been designated on the city plan as a street fifty *Page 60 feet wide but has never been legally
Bicking v. Florey's Brick Workspublic domain
Opinion by Head, J., The plaintiffs in Their bill prayed for an injunction to restrain the defendants from the commission or continuance of an alleged permanent trespass by the occupation of a portion of their land over which they had erected a bridge or causeway. The plaintiffs are the owners of a tract of land upon which is a mill fed by a mill race. They averred that they were the owners of the fee in the s
Commonwealth v. Eberhardtpublic domain
Argued March 25, 1949. The six defendants have appealed from conviction and sentence on a charge of common law rape allegedly committed by each of them upon the complainant. The one indictment contained three counts: (1) Common law rape, (2) assault and battery, and (3) contributing to the delinquency of a minor. Defendants were found guilty by a jury on all counts. They were severally sentenced on the count charging rape. The first question presented on these appeals by defendants rel
Ex parte Maloneypublic domain
GORMAN, J. Upon May 4,1917, James Maloney was arrested on a warrant issued by the governor of the state of Ohio in extradition charging him with being a fugitive from justice from the state of Pennsylvania, county of Lancaster. Maloney was taken into custody by the sheriff of Hamilton county under the warrant issued by 'the governor, and before he had an opportunity to be taken before one of the judges of the court of common
Burnet v. Chapinpublic domain
Mr. Presiding Justice Sullivan delivered the opinion of the court. By this appeal defendant, Ira J. Couch, impleaded with other members of a copartnership doing business under the name of S. B. Chapin & Co., seeks to reverse a judgment for $1,300 rendered against him in an action tried by the court without a jury, based on the disaffirmance of a contract made by a minor.