Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal Action No. 24-256 (CKK) KEVIN BRENT BUCHANAN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (May 13, 2025) A grand jury has charged Kevin Brent Buchanan by indictme

Hoekstra, J. In November 2016, petitioner, Stacia Buchanan, obtained an ex parte personal protection order (PPO) against respondent, John Crisler. Crisler filed a motion to terminate the PPO, and his motion was denied in March 2017. Crisler now appeals as of right the denial of his motion to terminate the PPO. For the reasons explained in this opinion, we vacate the trial court's order to the extent it relates to Crisler's online po

LaROSE, Judge. Solar Dynamics, Inc. (Solar), appeals the trial court’s order dismissing, without prejudice, its legal malpractice action against Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, P.C. (Buchanan), and Christopher E. Paradies. 1 We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(b)(1)(A). After careful review of the record, a

16‐1092‐cv In re Complaint of Buchanan Marine, L.P. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2016 (Argued: May 22, 2017 Decided: October 27, 2017) Docket No. 16‐1092‐cv IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT FRANK BELLEZZA, Appellant, v. JAMES MENENDEZ and CRARY BUCHANAN, P.A., Appellees. No. 4D17-3277 [May 8, 2019] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Wil

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT FRANK BELLEZZA, Appellant, v. JAMES MENENDEZ and CRARY BUCHANAN, P.A., Appellees. No. 4D17-3277 [March 6, 2019] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Wi

698 S.E.2d 485 (2010) Kevin D. BUCHANAN, Executor of the Estate of Kelly Buchanan and Guardian of the property of Tiffany Hope Buchanan, a minor; Kevin David Buchanan, Individually; and Christopher Buchanan, Individually, Plaintiffs, v. Teresa Hagy BUCHANAN, Defendant. No. COA09-1085. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. September 7, 2010.

Opinion HOCH, J. A jury convicted defendant Arlon Buchanan of possession of heroin for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351; count 1), transportation of heroin for sale (id., § 11352; count 2), possession of methamphetamine for sale (id., § 11378; count 3), transportahon of methamphetamine for sale (id., </

JUDGE SHELLY D. DICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT This matter is before the Court on the cross Motions for Summary Judgment1 by Defendants, F. King Alexander, Damon Andrew, A.G. Monaco, and Gaston Reinoso ("Defendants") and Plaintiff, Teresa Buchanan ("Plaintiff"). The parties have filed Oppositions2 and Replies3 to the

[Cite as State v. Buchanan, 2018-Ohio-1086.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 105706 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE

03/22/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 9, 2022 TAVARES DEWAYNE BUCHANAN V. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2016-A-196 Mark J. Fishburn, Judge ___________________________________

Opinion BENKE, J. Defendant and appellant Ramon Soto (Ramon) 1 appeals an order denying his motions to (1) vacate entry of default and default judgment pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 2 section 473 and (2) quash service of summons and d

JOHN K. BUSH, Circuit Judge. After a jury trial, Kitroy Brian Buchanan was convicted of one count of possession with intent to distribute marijuana and one count of conspiracy to distribute marijuana. The district court sentenced him to 50 months' imprisonment followed by three years of supervised release. Buchanan now appeals his conviction and sentence, and he makes four arguments. We

[Cite as State v. Buchanan, 2017-Ohio-1361.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 104500 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT METZ’S MOTION TO DISMISS GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This civil rights litigation arises out of Plaintiff John C. Buchanan, Jr.’s involvement in attempting to redevelop a manufacturing plant into a film studio as part of Michigan’s Film and Digital Media Tax Credit program. According to Plaintiff,

MEMORANDUM OPINION CHARLES R. SIMPSON III, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Motion by the Defendant, the United States of America (“United States”), to Dismiss all claims against it in Plaintiff Eddie Buchanan’s (“Buchanan”) Amended Complaint (DN 1-3) pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). DN 5. Fully briefed, the matter is now ripe for adjudication. Having considered the p

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Decker, Judges Beales, Huff, O’Brien, AtLee, Malveaux, Athey, Fulton, Ortiz, PUBLISHED Causey, Friedman, Chaney, Raphael, Lorish, Callins and White Argued at Richmond, Virginia PAMELA KAY HUMPHRIES OPINION BY v. Record No. 0877-22-2

IRVING, P.J., dissenting: ¶ 22. Buchanan was indicted and tried for aggravated assault on a peace officer. At the conclusion of the evidence, the trial court gave three jury instructions: one for aggravated assault on a peace officer; and two for simple assault, one for simple assault on a peace officer and one for “the lesser charge of [mjisdemeanor [sjimple [ajssault.” The victim identified in the indictment

723 F.Supp.2d 727 (2010) David J. BUCHANAN, Petitioner, v. G.R. JOHNSON, Warden, and Joseph R. Biden, III, Attorney General of the State of Delaware, Respondents.[1] Civil Action No. 08-639-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. September 27, 2010. *730 David J. Buchanan, pro se. Paul R. Wallace, Chief

2023 IL App (1st) 220320 SIXTH DIVISION May 19, 2023 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT No. 1-22-0320 MARVIN BUCHANAN, )