Cases

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Elizabeth T. Clement Brian K. Zahra

[Cite as Meyer v. Meyer, 2016-Ohio-5806.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Andrew J. Meyer, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 16AP-253 v. : (C.P.C. No. 11DR-3197) Tami K. Meyer, :

*** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND THE PACIFIC REPORTER *** Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 07-MAR-2023 09:11 AM

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MEYER KAMA, an individual, No. 23-55106 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:20-cv-10265- VAP-AS ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security, a government OPINION entity,

Military pay and disability claim; administrative separation based on nonjudicial conviction for malingering notwithstanding a referral by a Medical Evaluation Board to a Physical Evaluation Board; application of Army Regulations 635-40 and 635-200 OPINION AND ORDER Charles F. Lettow, Judge Sarah Jean Meyer seeks military back pa

SHORR, J. *649Plaintiffs, Sarah Meyer and Martin Wooldridge, appeal from a general judgment dismissing their action against defendants Oregon State Lottery (the Lottery), Jill Goldsmith, Larry Niswender, Tessa Sugahara, John Kroger, and Craig Durbin.1 Plaintiffs

OPINION AND ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, United States District Judge. Since the late eighteenth century, the Constitution of the. United States and the constitutions or laws of the several states have guaranteed U.S. citizens the right to a jury trial. This most precious and fundamental right can be waived only if the waiver is knowing and voluntary, with the courts “indulg[ing] every reasonable presumption agai

Per Curiam. Firestone Financial sued John Meyer as guarantor of defaulted loans. Meyer, proceeding pro se, asserted promissory estop-pel as‘ both a defense and counterclaim. After an earlier trip to this court, see Firestone Fin. Corp. v. Meyer, 796 F.3d 822 (7th Cir. 2015), the district court entered summary judgment for Firestone. Meyer filed two notices of appeal, and we consolidated the appeals. We

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 02/17/2023 09:05 AM CST - 573 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 313 Nebraska Reports AMANDA F. V. DANIEL K. Cite as 313 Neb. 573 Amanda F., appellee, v

[Cite as Buffenbarger v. Estate of Meyer, 2023-Ohio-2760.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HIGHLAND COUNTY ROBERT THOMAS BUFFENBARGER, ET AL., : Plaintiffs-Appellants, : Case No. 22CA10

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1238Before the Court is Defendant Fay Servicing, LLC's ("Fay Servicing") Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 7) filed on March 12, 2019, and Defendant McCalla, Raymer, Leibert, Pierce, LLC's ("MRLP") Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 12) filed on April 1, 2019. On March 26, 2019, and April 22, 2019, Plaintiff

OPINION AND ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. On December 16, 2015, plaintiff Spencer Meyer, on behalf of himself and those similarly situated, filed this putative antitrust class action lawsuit against defendant Travis Kalanick, CEO and co-founder of Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”). See Complaint, Dkt. 1. Mr. Meyer’s First Amended Complaint, filed on January 29, 2016

*439OPINION AND ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, United States District Judge. It is a sad day when, in response to the filing of a commercial lawsuit, a corporate defendant feels compelled to hire unlicensed private investigators to conduct secret personal background investigations of both the plaintiff and his counsel. It is sadder yet when these investigators

OPINION AND ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, United States District Judge. ' Since the late eighteenth century, the Constitution of the United States and the constitutions or laws of the several states.have guaranteed U.S. citizens the right to a jury trial. This most precious and fundamental right can be waived only if the waiver is knowing and voluntary, with the courts “indulg[ing] every reasonable presumption aga

OPINION AND ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, United States District Judge. On January 29, 2016, plaintiff Spencer Meyer, on behalf of himself and those similarly situated, filed his First Amended Complaint in this putative class action lawsuit against defendant Travis Kalanick, CEO and co-founder of Uber Technologies Inc. (“Uber”). See First Amended Complaint, Dkt. 26. Plaintiff Meyer alleged that defendant Kalanick,

MEMORANDUM OPINION Gladys Kessler, United States District Judge Plaintiff is Dayshawn Ingram, the son of the decedent, Anthony Chambers. Mr. Chambers died immediately after a violent encounter with the police. Plaintiff alleges that one of the police officers, Officer Michael Shipman-Meyer, illegally used a chokehold on his father, which caused his death

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2025 ND 116 Mary Roth and Aric Roth, Plaintiffs and Appellees v. Gary Meyer; Marty Meyer, individually, and as Co-Trustee of the Jean L. Ehrmantrout Residuary Trust; Medora Meyer; Carlos Meyer, individually and as Co-Trustee of the Jean L. Ehrmantrout Residuary Trust; Jewel Meyer; Chet Meyer, individually, as Personal Representative of the Est

SINGER, J. *488{¶ 1} Appellants, Marc and Paula Meyer, appeal the June 14, 2017 summary judgment of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas granted in favor of appellee, United Airlines Inc. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. Assignments of Error {¶ 2} Appellants set forth the following ass

Robert N. Opel, II, Chief Bankruptcy Judge (BI) Allen J. Meyer ("Plaintiff/Debtor") filed a two-count adversary complaint ("Complaint") alleging Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB ("Wilmington") and Selene Finance, LP ("Selene") (collectively "Defendants") violated Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure ("FRBP") 3002.1 and the discharge injunction. On October 13, 2018, Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment ("Motion"). For

By Judge David B. Carson In this medical-malpractice case, Plaintiff Lawton-Gunter alleges that, in May and June 2011, Defendant Meyer negligently performed a total abdominal hysterectomy to treat a uterine myoma. According to Plaintiff, the surgery terminated a pending pregnancy and left Plaintiff infertile. In addition, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Meyer negligently punctured her bowel and failed to monitor and treat P