Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Carpenter v. Perry”
Perry v. Estate of Carpenterpublic domain
930 N.E.2d 416 (2010) 236 Ill.2d 545 PERRY v. ESTATE OF CARPENTER. No. 109756. Supreme Court of Illinois. March 1, 2010. Disposition of Petition for Leave to Appeal[*] Denied. NOTES [*] For Cumulative Leave to Appeal Tables see preliminary pages of advance sheets and Annual Illinois Cumulative Leave to Appeal Table
Perry v. Estate of Carpenterpublic domain
FIFTH DIVISION November 13, 2009 No. 1-09-0312 DAMON D. PERRY, ) Appeal from the ) Circuit Court of Plaintiff-Appellant, ) Cook County.
Perry v. Estate of Carpenterpublic domain
918 N.E.2d 1156 (2009) Damon D. PERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The ESTATE OF Irene CARPENTER, A Disabled Person, Defendant-Appellee. No. 1-09-0312. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fifth Division. November 13, 2009. Rehearing Denied December 7, 2009. *1158 Arlene Y. Coleman, A.Y. Coleman & Associa
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-10-00243-CV PAMELA KAY CARPENTER AND APPELLANTS JEFFREY SCOTT CARPENTER AND APPELLEES V. ROBERT JOSEPH CARPENTER, APPELLEES DAVID TRENT DEATON, JAMES AND APPELLANTS EARL WARD, EDMOND WAYNE C
02-10-243-CV
Carpenter v. Guillory Inv., Inc.public domain
PERRY, Judge. *583This case focuses on a predial servitude created by destination of the owner and involves a residential water line. We affirm but remand to allow the trial court to amend the judgment in accordance with this opinion. FACTS Phillip E. Carpenter and Susan R. Carpenter ("Carpent
Carpenter v. Guillory Inv., Inc.public domain
PERRY, Judge. *583This case focuses on a predial servitude created by destination of the owner and involves a residential water line. We affirm but remand to allow the trial court to amend the judgment in accordance with this opinion. FACTS Phillip E. Carpenter and Susan R. Carpenter ("Carpent
SICAP INDUSTRIES, LLC v. Carpenterpublic domain
501 F.Supp.2d 335 (2007) SICAP INDUSTRIES, LLC, a New York Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff, v. Paul CARPENTER; Robert Haines, Jr.; Sinol USA, Inc.; and Americam Inc., Defendants. Robert Haines, Counter-Claimant, v. SiCap Industries, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; PP & S Ventures, LLC, a New York Limited Liability Company; Wayne Perry; Joyce Perry; and Robert Sasso, Counter-Defendants. No. 1:0
United States v. Carpenter, Sheilapublic domain
KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent because the officers’ rebanee upon the warrant was not reasonable given the exiguous information presented to the issuing judge, and thus the Leon good-faith exception does not apply to this case. See, United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 104 S.Ct. 3405, 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984). Consequently, I believe that
United States v. Carpenterpublic domain
MOORE, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I agree with the majority that the Government’s evidence was sufficient to support the conviction, that trial procedures did not violate Sheila Carpenter’s Sixth Amendment right to confront the witnesses against her, and that the Government is entitled to the forfeiture it seeks. I also agree with the majority that Captain Lawson’s affidavit did not provide probable cause for
Perry v. Williamspublic domain
70 P.3d 1283 (2003) 133 N.M. 844 2003-NMCA-084 Wanda PERRY, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Zollie Jeffrey WILLIAMS, Respondent-Appellant. No. 22,664. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. May 6, 2003. Certiorari Denied June 23, 2003. *1284 Edward L. Chávez, David J. Stout, Carpe
Ayala v. Perrypublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA24-251 Filed 19 March 2025 Wake County, No. 23 CVS 1154 VANESSA AGUILAR AYALA, MARWA SAAD EL METWALLY, KAREEMELDIN ELAZAB, SHARY MARGARITA LEDESMA, PATIENCE IMONI LYNCH, YAQUELIN ESTELA MEDINA, RUBEN MEDINA, ERIKA MARIVEL MEJIA, DESTINY SAMUEL, KRISTIN M. ZEDEK and CARLOS ALVAREZ, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v.
State v. Carpenterpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Carpenter, 2022-Ohio-898.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MONROE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Respondent-Appellee, v. JOSHUA E. CARPENTER, Defendant-Petitioner-Appellant.
State v. Carpenterpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Carpenter, 2020-Ohio-2791.] COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO, : JUDGES: : Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Plaintiff - Appellee : Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J.
Pavatt v. Carpenterpublic domain
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. Petitioner James Pavatt was convicted by an Oklahoma jury of first degree murder and conspiracy to commit first degree murder. Pavatt was sentenced to death for the first degree murder conviction and ten years' imprisonment for the conspiracy conviction. After exhausting his state court remedies, Pavatt filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to
United States v. Perrypublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1730 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. DAMIAN PERRY, a/k/a Primo, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE [Hon. John A. Woodcock, Jr., U.S. District Judge]
Perry v. Greenpublic domain
437 S.E.2d 150 (1993) Judith Elena PERRY, f/k/a Judith G. Cooper, Respondent-Appellant, v. James M. GREEN, III, Appellant-Respondent. No. 2069. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard June 15, 1993. Decided August 23, 1993. *151 Charles E. Carpenter, Jr., and Deborah L. Harrison, of Richardson, Plowden, Grier &
Austin Carpenter and Lauren Carpenter v. Brackish Development, LP D/B/A Marlin Landscape Systemspublic domain
AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed May 24, 2024 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00802-CV AUSTIN CARPENTER AND LAUREN CARPENTER, Appellants V. BRACKISH DEVELOPMENT, LP D/B/A MARLIN LANDSCAPE SYSTEMS, Appellee On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court
Austin Carpenter and Lauren Carpenter v. Brackish Development, LP D/B/A Marlin Landscape Systemspublic domain
Affirmed and Opinion Filed December 8, 2023 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00802-CV AUSTIN CARPENTER AND LAUREN CARPENTER, Appellants V. BRACKISH DEVELOPMENT, LP D/B/A MARLIN LANDSCAPE SYSTEMS, Appellee On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court
In re Carpenterpublic domain
DECISION AND ORDER ON DEBTOR’S MOTION TO AVOID JUDI-CIAL LIEN AND CREDITOR’S OBJECTION TO LIEN AVOIDANCE AND HOMESTEAD EX-EMPTION Diane Finkle, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge This contested matter is one of first impression in this district as it involves application of the Rhode Island homestead exemption under R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-26-4.1 (“Homestead Exemption”) to the mixed-use residential/commercial property of t