Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Carpenter v. CO LO of MO, LLC”
Carpenter Co. v. BASF SEpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN W. LUNGSTRUM, District Judge. This Memorandum and Order relates to two direct actions by plaintiffs who have opted out of the class certified in the main action in this multi-district antitrust case, as noted in the caption above. The direct actions are presently before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss the European plaintiffs’ claims based on European law (Do
Lee v. Enterprise Leasing Co.-West, LLCpublic domain
ORDER LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendants Enterprise Leasing Company-West, LLC (“Enterprise”) and Vanguard Car Rental USA, LLC’s (‘“Vanguard”) (collectively “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment on Liability. Doc. # 63.1 Plaintiffs Lydia Lee (“Lee”) and Carolyn Bissonette (“Bis-sonette”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed a Response (Doc. # 90), t
926 N. Ardmore Ave., LLC v. Cnty. of L. A.public domain
Corrigan, J. *324 Here we consider whether the County of Los Angeles can impose a documentary transfer tax on a written instrument that transfers beneficial ownership of real property from one person to two others. We hold that the tax may be imposed if the document reflects a sale: that i
WALLACH, Circuit Judge. In related petitions, 1 the American Legion- (“American Legion”), the National Organization of Veterans’ Advocates, Inc. ("NOVA”), and the .Veterans Justice Group, LLC (“VJG”) (collectively, “Petitioners”), challenge the validity of regulations issued in 2014 by the Department of Veterans Affairs
Lasater v. DirecTV, LLCpublic domain
STEPHEN V. WILSON, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE *998I. Introduction This case was filed in early 2016 and has now reached summary judgment. The individual Plaintiffs are scheduled for trials that span from November 2017 and into December 2017. DirecTV has claimed for years that the Installers it hires through Contractin
City of Modesto v. Dow Chemical Co.public domain
Filed 1/8/18 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION * IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR CITY OF MODESTO et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A134419 v. THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY et (San Francisco County Super. Ct. al., N
Garcia v. Chrysler Group LLCpublic domain
OPINION & ORDER KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge: Defendant FCA U.S. LLC, more commonly known as “Chrysler,” manufactures vehicles that have a key component known as the “Totally Integrated Power Module,” or “TIPM.” The TIPM functions as *216a vehicle’s electronic nerve center, and it is responsible for controlling and distributi
City of Modesto v. The Dow Chemical Co.public domain
Filed 2/6/18 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR CITY OF MODESTO et al., A134419 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (San Francisco County Super. Ct. v.
Access Now, Inc. v. Otter Products, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, Chief U.S.D.J. Plaintiff,1 Stephen Théberge, who is blind, ■ brings this action against. Otter Products, LLC (“Otter”), a producer of consumer electronics accessories, alleging its websites violate Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq, Théberge .has attempted to use Defendant’
Supreme Auto Transport LLC v. Arcelor Mittalpublic domain
Memorandum Opinion And Order Manish S. Shah, United States District Judge Plaintiffs allege that domestic steel manufacturers reduced steel production in a concerted effort to drive up the price of steel. Direct purchasers of steel then passed on the higher prices to downstream customers like the plaintiffs, who bought consumer products made with steel as well as other materials. Plaintiffs filed suit aga
Warr v. JMGM Group, LLCpublic domain
ADKINS, J., dissenting. On August 21, 2008, Michael Eaton entered JMGM’s bar where, over a six-hour period, he was served at least twenty-*200one alcoholic drinks, to the point of becoming violent and aggressive. Eaton then left the bar, got in his car, drove down the road at eighty-eight to ninety-eight miles per hour, collided with another car, and killed an innocent t
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
FILED 15-0547 7/24/2015 5:49:28 PM tex-6223072 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK
ORDER GRANTING SHAREHOLDER DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A STAY MARTIN GLENN, United States Bankruptcy Judge Pending before the Court are the following motions (collectively, the “Motions”): (i) Shareholder Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or, in the Alternative, for a Stay (the “Fund 1 Motion,” Adv. Pro. No. 10-04609, ECF Doc. #2387) and (ii) Shareholder De
Board of Trustees of the Ken Lusby Clerks & Lumber Handlers Pension Fund v. Piedmont Lumber & Mill Co.public domain
*1177ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, United States District Judge Plaintiff Board of Trustees of the Ken Lusby Clerks & Lumber Handlers Pension Fund (the “Board”) filed this action to recover a $1,660,266 withdrawal liability assessment imposed by ERISA when Defendant Piedmont Lumber & Mi
ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3
Biltmore Associates, LLC v. Twin City Fire Insurancepublic domain
572 F.3d 663 (2009) BILTMORE ASSOCIATES, LLC, as Trustee of the Visitalk Creditors Trust, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Indiana corporation; Great American Insurance Company, a New York corporation; Carolina Casualty Insurance Company; Old Republic Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania corporation; North American Specialty Insurance Company, a New Hampshire corporation, Defendants-Appellees. Biltmore Associates, LLC
Swissmex-Rapid S.A. de C.V. v. SP Systems, LLCpublic domain
Opinion KLEIN, P. J. Defendant and appellant SP Systems, LLC (SP), appeals a judgment confirming an arbitration award in favor of plaintiff and respondent Swissmex-Rapid S.A. de C.V. (Swissmex), a Mexican corporation. SP contends the trial court erred in entering judgment on the award because title 9 United States Code section 9 (section 9), part of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) (9 U.S.C
ACCEPTED 03-15-00293-CV 8312780 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
PDG Los Arcos, LLC v. Adams (In Re Mortgages Ltd.)public domain
427 B.R. 780 (2010) In re MORTGAGES LTD., Debtor. PDG Los Arcos, LLC, et al., Appellants, v. Robert M. Adams, et al., Appellees. No. CV 09-1312-PHX-MHM. Bankruptcy No. 2:08-bk-7465-RJH. Adversary Nos. 2:08-ap-00781-RJH, 2:08-ap-00831-RJH. United States District Court, D. Arizona. March 31, 2010. *782 Cathy L. Reece, Keith L.