Cases

[Cite as Caron v. Caron, 2017-Ohio-1070.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT GREENE COUNTY AMANDA L. CARON : : Appellate Case No. 2016-CA-37 Plaintiff-Appellant : : Trial Court Case No. 2014-DR-61 v.

RULING RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Jeffrey Alker Meyer, United States District Judge On a summer day in August 2012, two Glastonbury police officers were investigating an anonymous tip that a high school student was engaged in drug dealing. In the course of their investigation, the officers entered the empty attached garage of the Conroy family residence. The police did not have permission

PER CURIAM. Defendant-appellee moves to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the amount in controversy, which exceeds $2000, is above our maximum jurisdiction. Joseph G. Patterson, the plaintiff, who owns the premises 730 St. Louis Street in the City of New Orleans, in which there are located several apartments, is engaged in the business of leasing said apartments to various tenants. The defendant, Joh

19 B.R. 113 (1982) In re AUBURN MEDICAL REALTY, Auburn Medical Associates, Inc., Debtors. Charles E. BONARDI, Plaintiff, v. Roland CARON, Auburn Medical Assoc. Inc., Auburn Medical Realty, a limited partnership, Defendants. Appeal of Roland CARON. Bankruptcy No. 81-9011. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panels for the First Circuit. March 29, 1982.

DONOVAN, District Judge. The Court has jurisdiction in this diversity action. Plaintiff recovered a verdict against defendant for $8,000 in this Court in an action for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident while he was a guest passenger in defendant’s car, and which plaintiff attributed to the negligence of defendant. Judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant.

Hatfield, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: This is an 'appeal in an interference proceeding from tbe decision of tbe Board of Interference Examiners of tbe United States Patent Office awarding priority of invention of tbe subject matter defined in the counts in issue, Nos. 1 and 2, to appellee Martinus H. Caron. The interference is between appellee’s patent No. 2,290,318, issued

GREENE, Judge, concurring in the result. I believe: (I) Christopher’s records from the Emerson Waldorf School (School) were inadmissible hearsay, and (II) plaintiffs’ post-judgment settlements with the Lowmans and West were not sanctioned by Chapter IB of our General Statutes. Nonetheless, as plaintiffs have not been prejudiced by these errors, I concur in the result. I

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2023 ME 10 Docket: Yor-22-90 Argued: October 5, 2022 Decided: January 26, 2023 Panel: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, JABAR, HORTON, CONNORS, and LAWRENCE, JJ. STATE OF MAINE v. DOUGLAS E. WILCOX LAWRENCE, J. [¶1] Douglas E. Wilcox appeals from a judgment of c

[Cite as Molnar-Satterfield v. Molnar, 2021-Ohio-2698.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT GREENE COUNTY TAMELA K. MOLNAR-SATTERFIELD : : Plaintiff-Appellant : Appellate Case No. 2020-CA-52 : v.

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. RICHARD EVANS (SC 21006) Mullins, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Ecker, Dannehy and Bright, Js. Syllabus Convicted of murder and carrying a pistol without a permit in connection with the shooting death of the victim, the defendant appealed to this court. The defendant claimed that the trial court had improperly admitted the testimony of a lay witness, M, concerning his identifica

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ********************* MARK CROSBY, * * No. 18-1478V Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran * v. * Filed: July 22, 2021 * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Attorneys’ fe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Case No. 21-mj-218 (ZMF) WILLIAM CHRESTMAN, Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant William Chrestman, along with at least four co-conspirators, enthusiastic

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-22-00268-CR Darrel Gene Holloway, II, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY NO. 80649, THE HONORABLE JOHN GAUNTT, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Darrel G

TERRI F. LOVE, Judge. _JjJn this action for damages, the plaintiff, Gus Rico, claims that the Sewerage and Water Board and the City of New Orleans are liable for damages sustained as a result of an accident allegedly cause by a manhole cover located at the 1500 block of Carondolet. After a bench trial, the trial court found the defendants liable and apportioned each fifty percent fault. The defendants lodged separate appeals

255 P.3d 1126 (2011) The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner, v. Gonzalo Dalimiro SANTANA, Respondent. No. 09SC808. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. June 27, 2011. *1127 John W. Suthers, Attorney General, Rhonda L. White, Assistant Attorney General, Denver, Colorado, Attorneys for Petitioner. Leslie A. Goldstein

McDonald, J. In a criminal trial, the prosecutor asks the jury to draw various inferences from the evidence adverse to the defendant-the ultimate adverse inference being that the defendant is guilty as charged. In certain limited circumstances, one such adverse inference may be that the defendant's failure to call a witness peculiarly in the control of the defendant indicates that th

Rel: May 17, 2024 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is printed in Southern Reporter. SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA OCTOBER TERM, 20

In this appeal of his conviction for driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, defendant claims the trial court erred in (1) denying defendant's pretrial motion to suppress statements elicited from defendant while in circumstances that required Miranda warnings, and in consequently denying his motion to dismiss for lack of prima facie case; (2) admitting hearsay evidence highly prejudicial to defendant; and (3) denying defendant's motion for a

OPINION FRIEDLANDER, Judge. Bret Lee Sisson appeals following his convictions for Burglary 1 as a class B felony, Receiving Stolen Property 2 as a class D felony, and Unlawful Possession of a Firearm by a serious Violent Felon

AMENDED SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the appeal be and it hereby is DISMISSED. Defendants-appellants appeal from a February 6, 2004 order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Sandra J. Feuerstein, Judge), which, inter alia, denied their motion for summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity with r