Cases

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-06-00443-CV Carolyn Barnes, Appellant v. Edward C. Kirkpatrick, d/b/a Kirkpatrick Builders; Shawn Kirkpatrick; and Kirkpatrick Builders, Ltd., Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 277TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 04-263-C277, HONORABLE KEN ANDERSON, JUDGE PRESIDING

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District CAROLYN CASTEEL, ET AL., ) ) Respondents, ) WD86164 ) V. ) OPINION FILED: ) MARCH 19, 2024 CHARLES LAMMERS, ET AL.,

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 21-1124 CAROLYN CLARK, APPELLANT, V. DENIS MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. Before GREENBERG, FALVEY, and JAQUITH, Judges. OR D ER It is axiomatic th

The appealing party has shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence. However, upon much detailed reconsideration of the evidence, the undersigned reach the same facts as those reached by the Deputy Commissioner, with some modification but modifies the conclusions and holding of the Deputy Commissioner. The Full Commission, in their discretion, have determined that there are no good grounds in this case to receive further evidence or to rehear the parties or their representatives, as suffici

661 S.W.2d 197 (1983) U.S. ARMAMENT CORPORATION, Appellant, v. CHARLIE THOMAS LEASING COMPANY and Friendly Finance, Inc., Appellees. No. 01-83-0115-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). September 22, 1983. Rehearing Denied December 8, 1983. *198 Carolyn Pearson, Alan Steber, Edwin Kirkpatrick, Houst

KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge: In this diversity action, appellant Carolyn Ballew appeals from the district court’s *1326 grant of summary judgment for appellees A. H. Robins Co. on the ground that the court erred in holding that her action for personal injuries was barred by the applicable Georgia sta

FILED May 17, 2022 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST V

BACHARACH, Circuit Judge. This case involves a claim of employment discrimination. Mr. Michael Sungaila, who is legally blind, worked for Beverage Distributors Company. When his position was eliminated, Mr. Sungaila obtained a higher-paying job in the company’s warehouse. But, Mr. Sungaila’s employment was conditioned on passing a physical examination.

HOUSTON, Justice. We granted certiorari to consider a question of first impression, i.e.: In workmen’s compensation cases, does the minimum weekly compensation rate as established pursuant to § 25-5-68, Code 1975, apply to nonscheduled permanent partial disability *1096cases where compensation is provided and governed by § 25-5-57(a)(3)g, Code 1975?

597 F.Supp. 1562 (1984) Frederick KIRKPATRICK D.O.C. Number 100337, Petitioner, v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary and The Attorney General of the State of Louisiana, Respondents. No. 84-5025. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. December 3, 1984. *1563 *1564

Dissenting opinion filed by Senior Circuit Judge Sentelle. Tatel, Circuit Judge: When plaintiffs prevail in a civil rights case, the law usually entitles them to recover reasonable attorney's fees. Federal district judges, whom Congress has tasked with tabulating those fees, frequently find themselves whipsawed between two seemingly discordant instructions: (1) a

OPINION J. Brett Busby, Justice The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (UTMB) appeals the trial court’s order denying its motion to dismiss the medical malpractice claim filed by appellees Carolyn Callas, Ray Callas, and Jamie Callas on the ground that ap-pellees failed to serve timely an expert report and curriculum vitae as required by sectio

(2008) Cynthia A. DIXON v. CALUSA INVESTMENTS, LLC, d/b/a Next Day Loan. CA No. 06-442-T. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. March 27, 2008. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ERNEST C. TORRES, Senior District Judge. Cynthia Dixon brought this putative class action against Calusa Investments, LLC ("Calusa") alleging that Calusa violated

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2013 Term FILED June 19, 2013 released at 3:00 p.m. RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK No. 11-1646 SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA

Memorandum of Opinion and Order GAUGHAN, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Currently before the Court is Plaintiff Elliott Company’s Motion for Rule 59 Reconsideration and in the Alternative to Certify Pursuant to Rule 54(b) or to Amend the May 10, 2006 Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). (Doc. 51). The Elliott Company (“Elliott”) seeks reconsideration of the Court’s Ma

Justice KENNEDY delivered the opinion of the Court. *342 When the law grants persons the right to compensation for injury from wrongful conduct, there must be some demonstrated connection, some link, between the injury sustained and the wrong alleged. The requisite relation between prohibi

434 F.Supp.2d 483 (2006) ELLIOTT COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff, v. United Technologies Corporation, et al., Third Party Defendants. No. 1:05 CV 1387. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. May 10, 2006. *484 *485</

GLADNEY, Judge: This action ex delicto was brought by-Mrs. Gertie Mae Brooks, individually and as tutrix for her minor daughter, Penny Brooks, who sustained injuries on July 28, 1962 about 2:30 P.M. when the automobile in which she was riding as a guest passenger skidded out of control and struck a bridge abutment about twelve miles south of Ruston on U. S. Highway 167. Liability for the resulting damages is charged against, f

975 F.Supp. 774 (1994) Nabiha ABU-ZEINEH, as Administratrix of the Estate of Mohammad Abu-Zeineh, Yousra Abu-Karish, Mahmoud El-Attar, as Administrator of the Estate of Bahiyeh El-Attar, Nuwarah Mash'al, as Administratrix of the Estate of Mohammad Mash'al, Abdullah Gurab, as Administrator of the Estate of Asmah Gurab, Jihad Abu-Ramouz, as Administratrix of the Estate of Rushdi Abu-Ramouz, Abed Safi, as Administrator of the Estate of Aysha Safi, Ahmad Ess

MEMORANDUM ** James H. Leachman and the Leachman parties (“the Leachman parties”) appeal the district court’s decision granting summary judgment in favor of the Ash-Will parties. The parties are familiar with the facts and arguments and they need not be described in this memorandum. A district court’s grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo. Golden Gate Restaurant Ass’n v. City