Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BARRY S. SCHERMER, Bankruptcy Judge. INTRODUCTION On November 28, 1989, trustee John Y. LaBarge (hereinafter the “Trustee”) filed his Motion to Clarify, Allow & Pay Claims (hereinafter the “Motion”), in which he objects to the payment of post-petition interest on a home loan arrearage owed to Community Federal Savings and Loan Association (hereinafter “

[Re: Docket No. 52] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS EDWARD J. DAVILA, United States District Judge Presently before the Court is Defendant 7-Eleven’s (“Defendant” or “7-Eleven”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Scott Bishop’s (“Plaintiff’ or “Bishop”) Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). Plaintiff filed this putative class action against Defendant alleging that several of Defendan

DISMISS and Opinion Filed March 21, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01028-CV REGINA LEE AND ALL OCCUPANTS OF 2542 BISHOP ALLEN LANE, DALLAS, TEXAS 75237, Appellants V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, Appellee On Appeal from the

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: Petitioner Joshua Daniel Bishop was convicted in 1996 of malice murder and armed robbery, and sentenced to death. He appeals from the district court’s denial of habeas relief, raising two categories of claims: (1) three instances of ineffectiveness of trial counsel, see Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2

660 F.Supp.2d 1004 (2009) Allen BISHOP v. TYSON FOODS, INC. Case No. 07-CV-4060. United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Texarkana Division. September 14, 2009. *1007 Allen Bishop, Fort Smith, AR, pro se. Michael R. Jones, Christopher F. Woomer, Gilker & Jones, P.A., Mountainburg, AR, for Tyson Foods, Inc.

02-09-314-CV

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-09-00314-CV DONALD JOE BISHOP AND APPELLANTS CAROLYN BISHOP V. A.B. AUTO SALVAGE, STEVEN APPELLEES SCOTT HARCOURT, A.B.’S USED AUTO AND TRUCK PARTS, INC., JESSE SMALL, LTD., JESSE SMALL, A.B. FORD, A.B. CHEVY,

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON JUNE 1997 SESSION FILED June 19, 1997 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk JESSIE LEE BISHOP, ) ) C.C.A. No. 02C01-9609-CR-00301 Appellant, )

WISDOM, Circuit Judge: This case is before the Court on the issue of the liability of the defendant, Carolyn Lazarowitz Brafman, as an alleged transferee of the Estate of Abraham Lazarowitz, for unpaid estate taxes. 1

Appeal No. 16966 from Judgment dated April 27, 1987; J. Shannon Clark, Ruling Judge, Wayne County Chancery Court. Before ROY NOBLE LEE, C.J., and PRATHER and ANDERSON, JJ. Affirmed.

REVERSED AND REMANDED. PATTERSON, C.J., BROOM, P.J., and ROY NOBLE LEE, BOWLING, HAWKINS and PRATHER, JJ., concur. *Page 801

Opinion DAVIS, Judge: -_ T1 Susan D. Johnson, Chris L. Johnson, Christina Granath, and Lonnie Cassidy Ver-haal (the Residents) appeal the grant of summary judgment in favor of Weber County (the County). We affirm. BACKGROUND T2 This is an appeal from the district court's review of the Weber County Board of

Claim of LaShawn Smith, parent and next friend of A.J. OPINION AND ORDER PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Court This action was filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to enforce the rights of the plaintiff class members under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq., <

MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN T. LANEY, III, Bankruptcy Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE On April 20, 1989, a hearing was held on John Hanington’s (hereinafter “Movant”) Motion to Determine Secured Status as to DOCO School Employees Federal Credit Union (hereinafter “DOCO”) and Motion to Modify Stay. At the conclusion of the hearing, the court invited the parties to submit briefs on the issue of

JOHNSON, Circuit Judge. The widows of the victims of a small plane crash appeal from two district courts’ summary judgment dismissal of their products liability suit against Cessna Aircraft Co., the manufacturer of the airplane. The district courts in this consolidated suit held that the widows were precluded from suing Cessna because they made inconsistent statements in an earlier

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge This spring, a hearing officer in the District of Columbia’s Office of the State Superintendent of Education ordered the District of Columbia .Public Schools *251 (“DCPS”) to hold an Ind

Cite as 2025 Ark. 59 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered: May 1, 2025 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2025 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2025 annual attorney-license fee was April 15, 2025. As required by Rule VII(C)(9) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, the clerk of t

MOORE, Chief Justice (concurring specially). I write specially to provide further support for the Court’s reversal of Ex parte Bayliss, 550 So.2d 986 (Ala.1989). Specifically, as I explained in my special writing in Ex parte Tabor, 840 So.2d 115, 123-30 (Ala.2002) (Moore, C.J., concurring in part and dissenting in part), Bayliss violated (1) the separation-of-powers doctrine and

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC11-2083 ____________ GARY RICHARD WHITTON, Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ____________ No. SC12-25

797 F.2d 1116 5 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1030 Carol PALLAZOLA, Administratrix of the Estate of Betty AnnMichaud, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.Carolyn RUCKER, R.N., et al., Defendants, Appellees.Appeal of Eugene SMITH, M.D.Carol PALLAZOLA, Administratrix of the Estate of Betty AnnMichaud, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.Carolyn RUCKER, R.N., Defendant, Appellant.Carol PALLAZOLA, Administratrix of the Estate of Be