Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Carole M. Thomas”
West Alabama Women's Center v. Thomas M. Millerpublic domain
PER CURIAM: This is an appeal from the grant of a preliminary injunction that was issued on October 27-, 2016 arid was last amended on November 22, 2016. W. Ala. Women’s Ctr. v. Miller, 217 F.Supp.3d 1313 (M.D. Ala. 2016), The appeal was scheduled to be orally argued before this Court at 9:00 a.m. on Friday morning, October 27, 2017. At a
Thomas v. Meadorspublic domain
BRANDON J. HARRISON, Judge |, Carolyn Thomas, administratrix of the estate of Alfred Thomas, Sr., appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of Dr. Carol Meadors'and Little Rock Anesthesia Services, ‘ PLLC. Thomas argues that she' met her burden of meeting proof with proof and demonstrated a genuine issue of material fact as to causation. We disagree an
OPINION RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge. The decedent, Abraham Karam, executed a trust agreement in 1987 that divided *423 his assets equally between a marital trust and a residual family trust. In 1994, the decedent entered into a contract with Sagemark Consulting, Inc. (t
GUIDRY, Justice In this medical malpractice case, the defendant surgeon ordered pre-operative tests including a chest x-ray and an electrocardiogram ("EKG") before performing non-emergency gallbladder surgery on the plaintiff. However, the defendant did not review the results of these tests prior to performing the surgery, but had he done so, the tests would have alerted him to potentia
Thomas v. Firerock Products, LLCpublic domain
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT GENERAL SHALE BRICK’S MOTION TO DISMISS DEBRA M. BROWN, District Judge. This is a product liability action brought under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq., and Mississippi state law. • In their amended complaint, Plaintiffs Amy Thomas, John Thomas, Carole Murphey, and Smith Murphey allege that Defendant General Shale Br
Carole A. Simpson v. Office of Personnel Managementpublic domain
LOURIE, Circuit Judge. Carole Simpson appeals from the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board affirming the Office of Personnel Management’s (“OPM’s”) denial of her application for a survivor annuity. Simpson v. Office of Pers. Mgmt., 92 M.S.P.R. 210, 2002 WL 1906866 (M.S.P.B. 2002) (“Final Decision”). Because we hold that
Richard Barnett v. Richard M. Daley, and Carole Bialczak, Defendants-Intervenors-Appelleespublic domain
POSNER, Chief Judge. The Chicago City Council is composed of 50 aldermen, each elected from a different ward. Illinois law requires that the wards be redistrieted after each decennial census. The latest redistricting plan was adopted by referendum (after the Council itself could not agree on a plan) in 1992, and is challenged in this suit by black voters who claim mainly that
Thomas v. Alfordpublic domain
230 S.W.3d 853 (2007) Gene THOMAS and Carolyn Thomas, Appellants v. Jeffery ALFORD, M.D., Sweetwater Medical Associates, P.L.L.C., and Robert Malone, M.D., Appellees. No. 14-06-00796-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). July 19, 2007. *855 Gordon R. Cooper II, Houston, for appellants. Erin E. Lunceford, Joe
Thomas M. Cook and Carol L. Cook v. United Statespublic domain
KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge. The plaintiffs-appellants, Thomas M. Cook (“Cook”) and Carol L. Cook, a married couple (“the Cooks”) have contested the district court’s dismissal, for failure to state a claim, of their petition to quash an administrative summons issued by the Internal Revenue Service (“I.R.S.” or the Service ). The summons demanded production of certain third-party ba
State of Florida v. Thomas D. Woodelpublic domain
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC12-132 ____________ STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, vs. THOMAS D. WOODEL, Appellee. ____________ No. SC12-132
Elvira M. Jimenez v. Madison Area Technical College, Jackye Thomas, Carol Bassett, and William Stryckerpublic domain
COFFEY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Elvira Jimenez (“Jimenez”) filed an action against her former employer Madison Area Technical College (the “College”) under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983, alleging that the College had discriminated against her on the basis of race, ethnic origin, and sex. After finding that Jimenez had relied on falsified documents to support her civil rights claim
In Re Estate of Thomaspublic domain
28 So.3d 627 (2009) In the Matter of the ESTATE OF Ollie M. THOMAS, Deceased: John D. Thomas, Jr., Appellant, v. Lynda Thomas Thoms, Carol Thomas Deady And Cathy Thomas May, Appellees. No. 2008-CA-00462-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. July 28, 2009. Rehearing Denied December 1, 2009. Certiorari Denied February 25, 2010.
State v. Thomaspublic domain
902 A.2d 1185 (2006) 188 N.J. 137 STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Chris THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant. Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued November 30, 2005. Decided August 2, 2006. Frank J. Pugliese, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant *1186 (Yvonne Smith Segars, P
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 24, 2022 Decided May 21, 2024 No. 21-5299 NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, APPELLEE v. CAROLE JOHNSON, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ADMINISTRATOR, HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICE ADMINISTRATION AND XAVIER BECERRA, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
186 F.Supp.2d 567 (2002) COREGIS INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff, v. LAW OFFICES OF CAROLE F. KAFRISSEN, P.C., et. al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.98-6769. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. February 11, 2002. *568 Arthur W. Lefeco, Victor M. Verbeke, Andrew B. Clauss, Kristine M. Maciolek, Cozen and O'Connor, Philadelphia, PA,
813 F.Supp. 1349 (1993) NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS M. MADDEN & COMPANY; Frank Steck; Phyllis Cannonito, Executrix of the Estate of Immanuel Cannonito, deceased; Joseph T. Zieminski; Carol Marynowski; and Clarence Dew, Defendants. No. 91 C 8297. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. February 4, 1993.
Carole J. Boyd v. Town of Morrisonpublic domain
12/29/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 2, 2022 Session CAROLE J. BOYD ET AL. v. TOWN OF MORRISON Appeal from the Chancery Court for Warren County No. 15066 Don R. Ash, Senior Judge No. M2021-01542-COA-R3-CV The
WOODWARD, SCOTT v. CHAPMAN, THOMAS M.public domain
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 960 CA 12-00325 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. SCOTT WOODWARD, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THOMAS M. CHAPMAN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, CAROL A. CONKLIN AND TERRY E. REED, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. THOMAS P. DURKIN, ROCHESTER, FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. Appeal from an order of the Supreme
In Re M.M.public domain
The respondent, C.S., appeals from an order of the trial court finding her to be an unfit parent, terminating her parental rights, and granting the State the power to consent to the adoption of the respondent's minor children, M.M. and J.M. We affirm. On April 29, 1996, the State filed a petition for adjudication of neglect and abuse. On May 9, 1996, the State filed an amended petition alleging that both of C.S.'s children, M.M. and J.M., born February 22, 1992, and May 12, 199
People v. Thomaspublic domain
110 Cal.Rptr.2d 571 (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 212 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Michael Lenvell THOMAS, Defendant and Appellant. No. B144240. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Five. August 1, 2001. As Modified August 8, 2001. Review Denied October 31, 2001. James M. Crawford, under appointment