⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Carol Walker”

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020-04-16 · Published · cited 21× · 956 F.3d 163
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 19-1067 ____________ CAROL LEE WALKER, Appellant v. SENIOR DEPUTY BRIAN T. COFFEY, In His Individual Capacity; SPECIAL AGENT PAUL ZIMMERER, In His Individual Capacity ___
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018-09-20 · Published · cited 32× · 905 F.3d 138
ROTH, Circuit Judge Appellant Carol Lee Walker commenced this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . She alleges that Appellees-a prosecutor and a special agent employed by the Pennsylvania Office of the Attorney General (OAG)-violated her Fourth Amendment
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) · 2025-03-27 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________ NO. 09-23-00105-CV ________________ FREDDIE WALKER, Appellant V. CAROL ASCOL, Appellee _____________________________________
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999-11-30 · Published · cited 0× · 197 F.3d 956; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 30702; 1999 WL 1077074
McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. Carol L. Walker appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court 1 for the District of Minnesota affirming the Social Security Commissioner’s decision to deny her application for supplemental security income (SSI). For reversal, Walker argues that the administrative law judge (ALJ)
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2008-12-17 · Published · cited 0×
i i i i i i MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-08-00644-CV IN RE CAROL WALKER AS INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATRIX WITH WILL ANNEXED, OF THE ESTATE OF GERTRUDE C. JOHNSTON, DECEASED Original Mandamus Proceeding1 PER CURIA
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2008-12-17 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-08-00644-CV IN RE CAROL WALKER AS INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATRIX WITH WILL ANNEXED, OF THE ESTATE OF
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012-08-20 · Published · cited 1× · 688 F.3d 477; 2012 WL 3553285; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 17453
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Carol (Lynn) and Jason Hutson brought this action against Jude Walker, Julie Baumgardner, and Sallie West, social service employees in Jackson County, Missouri, alleging they violated 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law by recommending that custody of their son A.H. be granted to his grandparents, Carolyn and Patrick Cattin. According to the Hutsons this recomme
Supreme Court of the United States · 2013-12-09 · Published · cited 0× · 134 S. Ct. 817; 187 L. Ed. 2d 618; 82 U.S.L.W. 3348; 571 U.S. 1106; 2013 WL 6388965; 2013 U.S. LEXIS 8802
Former decision, 134 S.Ct. 248Petition for rehearing denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2013-10-07 · Published · cited 0× · 134 S. Ct. 248; 187 L. Ed. 2d 183; 82 U.S.L.W. 3186; 571 U.S. 902; 2013 WL 3465796; 2013 U.S. LEXIS 5938
Case below, 966 N.E.2d 868.Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts denied.
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016-06-07 · Published · cited 0× · 211 So. 3d 738; 2016 Miss. App. LEXIS 369
WILSON, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. In May 2009, a biopsy of Carol Gray’s spine showed that she had multiple myeloma, a form of bone cancer. The results were sent to Dr. Eric Graham, the orthopedic surgeon who performed the biopsy, but Dr. Graham failed to communicate the results to Gray. Over one year later, another doctor discovered the biopsy results in Gray
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008-06-17 · Published · cited 6× · 52 A.D.3d 697; 860 N.Y.S.2d 188
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (LaMarca, J.), entered June 28, 2007, as, upon reargument, granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, which had been denied in a prior order of the same court dated February 20, 2007. Ordered that the order entered June 28, 2007 is affirmed
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999-11-30 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 97-4285 ___________ Carol Walker, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States
State v. Walkerpublic domain
Supreme Court of Kansas · 2016-05-27 · Published · cited 40× · 304 Kan. 441; 372 P.3d 1147; 2016 WL 3036945; 2016 Kan. LEXIS 298
The opinion of the court was delivered by Stegall, J.: A jury convicted Tyrone Walker of first-degree premeditated murder for the killing of Janis Sanders. We affirm Walker’s conviction and sentence and hold: (1) any error by the district court in failing to provide a lesser included instruction was harmless; (2) the State did not err during closing argument
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014-07-11 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 20, 2014 Session ROBERT WALKER AND SUSAN ELDER1 v. CHARLES SMITH V. CLIFFORD BYRNE AND WIFE, CAROL BYRNE An Appeal from the Chancery Court for Marion County No. 7648 Jeffrey F. Stewart
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2018-04-11 · Published · cited 0× · 813 S.E.2d 112
Justice Ketchum : This action concerns the Sleepy Creek Forest Subdivision, a residential community located in Morgan County. Arthur L. Conkey, Jr., and Jo Carol Conkey, lot owners in the Subdivision, appeal from the December 22, 2016, order of the Circuit Court of Morgan County. Pursuant to the order, summary judgment was granted for the Subdivision's Association and against the Conkeys for $1,215.00 in delinquent residential asses
Walker v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Florida · 2012-04-19 · Published · cited 9× · 88 So. 3d 128; 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 291; 2012 Fla. LEXIS 753; 2012 WL 1345408
PER CURIAM. Robert Shannon Walker, II, was convicted of the 2003 first-degree murder, kidnapping, and aggravated battery of David “Opie” Hamman and sentenced to death. On direct appeal, this Court affirmed Walker’s convictions and death sentence. Walker v. State, 957 So.2d 560, 570 (Fla.2007). Walker later filed a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. Walker appeals fro
Wolf v. Walkerpublic domain
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2014-06-06 · Published · cited 2× · 986 F. Supp. 2d 982; 2014 WL 2558444; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77125
OPINION and ORDER BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge. Plaintiffs Virginia Wolf, Carol Schumacher, Kami Young, Karina Willes, Roy Badger, Garth Wangemann, Charvonne Kemp, Marie Carlson, Judith Trampf, Katharina Heyning, Salud Garcia, Pamela Kleiss, William Hurtubise, Leslie Palmer, Johannes Wallmann and Keith Borden are eight same-sex couples residing in the state of Wisconsin who either want to get married
Wolf v. Walkerpublic domain
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2014-06-13 · Published · cited 0× · 26 F. Supp. 3d 866; 2014 WL 2693963; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82242
OPINION and ORDER BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge. In an order dated June 6, 2014, dkt. #118, I denied defendants’ motion to dismiss and granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs’ claim that Wisconsin laws banning same-sex couples from marrying violated the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. However, I did not resolve plaintiffs’ request for injunctive relief or d
Wolf v. Walkerpublic domain
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2014-03-24 · Published · cited 0× · 9 F. Supp. 3d 889; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38554; 2014 WL 1207514
OPINION and ORDER BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge. Plaintiffs in this case are challenging the constitutionality of Wisconsin restrictions on marriage between same-sex couples. After plaintiffs withdrew their motion for a preliminary injunction in favor of ah expedited schedule, dkt. # 55, Magistrate Judge Stephen Crocker set deadlines for filing dispositive motions, which means that briefing will be finish
Ohio Supreme Court · 2008-07-08 · Published · cited 0× · 119 Ohio St. 3d 47; 891 N.E.2d 740
Moyer, C.J., dissenting. {¶ 20} Respondent committed multiple ethical rule violations by (1) forging various signatures on a deed during a drinking binge, (2) lying about these actions during the disciplinary process, and (3) being arrested for and pleading guilty to possession of cocaine, a fifth-degree felony. I agree with the majority that these violations warrant an actual suspension from the practice of law