⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Carol T. Lewis”

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024-08-02 · Published · cited 2× · 111 F.4th 65
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 7, 2024 Decided August 2, 2024 No. 23-5152 CAROL A. LEWIS AND DOUGLAS B. SARGENT, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, APPELLANTS v. XAVIER BECERRA, IN HIS CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995-04-20 · Published · cited 0× · 52 F.3d 325; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18011; 1995 WL 234662
52 F.3d 325NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Janice HERT, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Jack LEWIS, Commissioner; Betty Kassulke, Warden; Carol T.Shirley, Assistant Deputy Warden, Defendants-Appellees.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025-01-07 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Filed On: January 7, 2025 No. 23-5152 CAROL A. LEWIS AND DOUGLAS B. SARGENT, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, APPELLANTS v. XAVIER BECERRA, IN HIS CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, APPELLEE
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009-07-22 · Published · cited 2× · 24 So. 3d 564; 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10003; 2009 WL 2168815
24 So.3d 564 (2009) Scott LEWIS, Carol Lewis, and Scott Lewis Gardening & Trimming, Inc., Appellants, v. NICAL OF PALM BEACH, INC., and Amy Habie, Appellees. No. 4D07-3721. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. July 22, 2009. *565 Scott Lewis and Carol Lewis, West Palm Beach, pro se. Bard D. Rockenbach
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009-03-25 · Published · cited 2× · 10 So. 3d 159; 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2499; 2009 WL 763530
10 So.3d 159 (2009) Scott LEWIS, Carol Lewis and Scott Lewis' Gardening & Trimming, Inc., Appellants, v. NICAL OF PALM BEACH, INC., a Delaware corporation, Amy Habie, individually, and Boies Schiller & Flexner, LLP, Appellees. Nos. 4D08-419, 4D08-671. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. March 25, 2009. Rehearing Denied June 3, 2009.
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2019-07-16 · Published · cited 0×
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ESTATE OF ROBERT G. LEWIS, by KATHY J. FOR PUBLICATION LEWIS, Personal Representative, July 16, 2019
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009-06-18 · Published · cited 5× · 406 B.R. 288; 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 2027; 2009 WL 1725898
406 B.R. 288 (2009) In re Nathaniel and Carol Ann NEAL, Debtors. Wendy Turner Lewis, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Public Service Credit Union, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 08-57254-R. Adversary No. 08-5147. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. June 18, 2009. *289 H. Robert Pierce, Royal Oak, MI, for Debtor
Massachusetts Superior Court · 2022-01-07 · Published · cited 0×
SUPERIOR COURT JAMES CARVER vs. CAROL A. MICl[1] and STEPHEN KENNEDY[2] Docket: 2177CV00105 / 2177CV00272 Dates: December 30, 2021 Present:
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019-08-09 · Published · cited 0×
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT WILLIAM BECK, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v.
People v. Lewispublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022-11-16 · Published · cited 0× · 176 N.Y.S.3d 799; 210 A.D.3d 908; 2022 NY Slip Op 06497
People v Lewis (2022 NY Slip Op 06497) People v Lewis 2022 NY Slip Op 06497 Decided on November 16, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2021-01-28 · Published · cited 0×
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-18-00488-CR ___________________________ DANITA CAROL THETFORD, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 432nd District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1558380R Before Sudderth, C.J.; Womack and Wallach, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007-10-01 · Published · cited 427× · 501 F.3d 1244; 37 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20269; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 22971; 2007 WL 2826618
501 F.3d 1244 (2007) R.A. McELMURRAY, III, G. William Boyce, David L. Lewis, Plaintiffs-Appellants, United States of America, ex rel., Plaintiff, v. The CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT OF AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY, Defendant-Appellee, Augusta, GA, Movant-Appellee. No. 06-16493. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. October 1, 2007.
In re W.E.T.public domain
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002-03-14 · Published · cited 0× · 793 A.2d 471
Terry, Associate Judge: In this adoption case, D.B., the natural mother of the child K.D.B., seeks reversal of the trial court’s order waiving her consent to the adoption. See D.C.Code § 16-304(e) (2001). The adoptive parents, W.E.T. and I.J.T., cross-appeal from the trial court’s order vacating and re-entering the final adoption decree to enable D.B. to file her notice of appeal, which would otherwise have been unt
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2018-10-25 · Published · cited 0×
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-16-00224-CR ___________________________ CARTER CAROL CERVANTEZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 297th District Court Ta
Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2024-07-25 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 VI Super 27P
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST THOMAS AND ST JOHN PEOPLE OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS ) ) Plaintiff, ) v ) CASE NO ST 2] CR 0380 ) CASE NO ST 22 CR 0068 MlCAlAH COZIBR
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026-03-19 · Published · cited 0×
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT CAROL J. LEWIS, Appellant, v. COMMUNITY SAVANNA CLUB JOINT VENTURE, Appellee. No. 4D2025-2022 [March 19, 2026] Appeal from the County Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Edmond W
Nicholson v. Lewispublic domain
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988-05-23 · Published · cited 5× · 369 S.E.2d 649; 295 S.C. 434; 1988 S.C. App. LEXIS 87
295 S.C. 434 (1988) 369 S.E.2d 649 Carol G. NICHOLSON and Deborah Lee Lewis, Respondents v. Daniel T. LEWIS, Jr., Appellant. 1166 Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard April 12, 1988. Decided May 23, 1988. *435 Robert Marshall Jones, Rock Hill, for appellant. Ge
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2018-11-08 · Published · cited 0×
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-16-00224-CR ___________________________ CARTER CAROL CERVANTEZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 297th District Court Ta
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2014-10-01 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-14-00099-CR EX PARTE: CAROL PASELK On Appeal from the 8th District Court Hopkins County, Texas Trial Court No. 00665 Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley MEMORANDUM OPINION Carol Paselk’s app
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017-11-21 · Published · cited 10× · 808 S.E.2d 488; 256 N.C. App. 401
DILLON, Judge, dissenting. This appeal involves a number of actions brought by landowners claiming that NCDOT has "taken" interests in their land by filing of maps showing future highway projects pursuant to the Map Act. The trial court entered an order determining that *503NCDOT's filing of the maps constituted a taking and directed NCDOT to