Cases

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-09-00214-CR ______________________________ CAROL MARIE PASELK, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law Hopkins County, Texas Trial Court No. CR0926723 Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ

Affirmed and Opinion Filed December 7, 2022 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00404-CV CAROL YANCEY, Appellant V. SLJ COMPANY, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

THARP, District Judge. Juan McGee, a civil detainee at the Illinois Department of Human Services’ Treatment and Detention Facility at Rush-ville (“Rushville”), brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that twenty-three 1 state officials, employees, and private medical professionals were deliberately indifferent

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-KA-00312-COA BILLY CAROL ANDERSON A/K/A BILLY APPELLANT CAROL ANDERSON SR. v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/06/2015 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ROBERT P. KREBS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: GEORGE COUNTY CIRCUIT COU

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE July 10, 2014 Session CAROL PAYNE McKINNIS v. SANDRA KIM HAMMONS Appeal from the Chancery Court for Johnson County No. 6168 John C. Rambo, Chancellor No. E2013-02733-COA-R3-CV-FILED-OCTOBER 30, 2014 Carol Payne McKinnis (“Seller”) brought suit against Sandra Kim Hammons (“Purchaser”) to enforce

60 F.3d 600 Medicare & Medicaid Guide P 43,471,95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5489,95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9373Virginia CLARK, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Molly Joel COYE, M.D., M.P.H., Director, State Department ofHealth Services, Defendant-Appellant.Virginia CLARK; Marie Evers; Susan Ray; AnastasiaPreciado; George Frazier; Evelyn Carlin; Solange Soja, byher guardian ad litem Susette Soja; Sobrique Soja;

COX, Circuit Judge: I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Carol Stavropoulos, appeals the district court’s entry of summary judgment for the Defendant Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia (“Board”) on her claim that the Board violated the anti-retaliation provision of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a). She also appeal

Carol Mahoney appeals from a judgment of the Baldwin Circuit Court awarding her $500 as an attorney fee and costs pursuant to the Alabama Litigation Accountability Act, § 12-19-270 *Page 2 et seq., Ala. Code 1975 ("ALAA"). We reverse and remand. This is the third time these parties have been before this court. InMahoney v. Loma Alta Property Owners Ass'n, 4 So. 3d 1130

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 07-4036 C AROL A. G LASER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W OUND C ARE C ONSULTANTS, INCORPORATED , M ELISSA E. M ILLER, and D R. S TEVEN M ILLER, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of In

*249¶1 Anita B. and David N. were foster parents for A.C. during a parental rights termination proceeding in Montana. Before they could finalize adoption of A.C., the Montana Supreme Court reversed the termination and A.C.’s mother — Holly C. — took him to Washington.1 Anita and David then filed a petition for nonparental custody in Spokane County Superior Court. In gra

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON February 19, 2014 Session CARROLL MARIE STOVALL, ET AL. v. UHS OF LAKESIDE, LLC, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT00600610 John R. McCarroll, Jr., Judge No. W2013-01504-COA-R9-CV - Filed April 22, 2014 Appellant medical providers appeal the trial c

NUMBER 13-11-00473-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ROBERT S. LEMER, Appellant, v. CAROL COGGINS AND HARLEY JEROME COGGINS, Appellees.

COFFEY, Circuit Judge. Carol Hottenroth sued her employer, the Village of Slinger, Wisconsin (“Sling-er”), asserting various claims of discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The district court, Judge Rudolph T. Randa presiding, consolidated two separate actions filed in federal court by Hottenroth alleging discrimination in her employment and

CALABRESI, Circuit Judge: In this appeal from a conviction of narcotics offenses, defendant-appellant Carol Bayless argues that the district judge (Harold Baer, Jr., J.) who presided over a pretrial suppression hearing was obliged to recuse himself in the interest of the appearance of justice. Judge Baer’s original decision to grant Bayless’s motion to suppre

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 8, 2004 Session NANCY CAROL CANTRELL v. JAMES MARK CANTRELL Appeal from the Chancery Court for Williamson County Nos. 28051 and 28245 R. E. Lee Davies, Judge No. M2003-00551-COA-R3-CV - Filed March 28, 2005 This is a divorce proceeding in which the parties accused each other of ina

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 03-2211 CAROL HOTTENROTH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VILLAGE OF SLINGER, Defendant-Appellee. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 14–0317 Filed January 29, 2016 Amended April 6, 2016 IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF RICHARD C. MAUER AND CAROL K. MAUER, Upon the Petition of RICHARD C. MAUER, Appellee, And Concerning CAROL K. MAUER, Appellant. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, Jon Fister, Judge.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2002-EC-00822-SCT JACOB M. RUSH v. CAROL M. IVY DATE OF JUDGMENT: 5/8/2002 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. GRAY EVANS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HUMPHREYS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ELLIS TURNAGE ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: BEN J. PIAZZA, JR. NATURE OF TH

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Carol Jean Brooks brought this action against the manufacturer of Simplex bone cement claiming damages for injury resulting from its failure to give adequate warnings about product dangers. The case was *787dismissed on summary judgment after the district court1 concluded that her claim was preempted by federal law,