Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Carmen Ventura”
United States v. Mar a Del Carmen Ventura-Melendezpublic domain
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Defendant Maria del Carmen Ventura-Meléndez (“Ventura” or “defendant”) appeals her conviction for trespassing on a United States military installation. She asserts numerous grounds for appeal, all of which we find unavailing. We therefore affirm her conviction. I. BACKGROUND Ventura, a native of Vieques, Pue
Wadsworth Ventura Associates 367 LLC v. Friaspublic domain
The record shows that tenant violated two probationary stipulations in this chronic nonpayment case. Accordingly, it was not an abuse of discretion for the court to enforce the stipulation by its terms, which provided for no further defaults, and allow for the eviction of tenant (see Hotel Cameron, Inc. v Purcell, 35 AD3d 153, 155-156 [1st Dept 2006]; see also 565 Tenants Corp. v Adams, 54 AD3d 602 [1st Dept 2008]). Concur — Andrias, J.P
Wadsworth Ventura Associates 367 LLC v. Friaspublic domain
The record shows that tenant violated two probationary stipulations in this chronic nonpayment case. Accordingly, it was not an abuse of discretion for the court to enforce the stipulation by its terms, which provided for no further defaults, and allow for the eviction of tenant (see Hotel Cameron, Inc. v Purcell, 35 AD3d 153, 155-156 [1st Dept 2006]; see also 565 Tenants Corp. v Adams, 54 AD3d 602 [1st Dept 2008]). Concur — Andrias, J.P
Moreno Martínez v. Martínez Venturapublic domain
Opinión disidente emitida, en etapa de reconsideración, por el Juez Asociado Señor Rebollo López. Resulta verdaderamente lamentable y desconcertante que, mientras distinguidos tribunales de otras jurisdicciones hacen esfuerzos extraordinarios por mejorar la práctica de la notaría para garantizar al máximo los derechos de las partes otorgantes de los distintos instrumentos que se otorgan ante los notarios, el m
Moreno Martínez v. Martínez Venturapublic domain
El Juez Asociado Señor Fuster Berlingeri emitió la opinión del Tribunal. Tenemos la ocasión para determinar si resulta nulo un testamento abierto en el cual la identificación del testador *288por conocimiento del notario autorizante es precedida por una identificación a través de los medios supletorios dispuestos en la Ley Notarial de Puerto Rico (Ley
Carmen Peralta v. Hispanic Business, Inc.public domain
RESTANI, Judge: Carmen Peralta appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of her former employer, Hispanic Business, Inc. (“HBI”). Peralta alleges that HBI breached its fiduciary duty as an ERISA plan administrator by failing to inform her in a timely manner that her *1067 ER
OPINION PER CURIAM. Jovita Mateo-Ventura petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) final order of removal. We will dismiss her petition in part and deny it in part. I. Mateo (as she refers to herself) is a citizen of Mexico who entered the United States in 1993. In 2004, the Government charged her as removable for being present without having
OPINION PER CURIAM. Jovita Mateo-Ventura petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) final order of removal. We will dismiss her petition in part and deny it in part. I. Mateo (as she refers to herself) is a citizen of Mexico who entered the United States in 1993. In 2004, the Government charged her as removable for being present without having
THE STATE OF FLORIDA v. VENTURA GUTIERREZpublic domain
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed February 16, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D21-989 Lower Tribunal Nos. F19-7423, F19-1601 ________________ The State of Florida, Appellant,
Ventura v. ABM Industries Inc.public domain
Opinion ARMSTRONG, J. ABM Industries Incorporated, ABM Janitorial Services, Inc., and American Building Maintenance Company appeal from the judgment entered against them and in favor of respondent Sylvia Ventura, on Ventura’s complaint. We affirm. FACTS Ventura worked for defendants1 as a janitor. In December of 2004, Carlos Manzano became her
State v. Venturapublic domain
952 A.2d 1049 (2008) 196 N.J. 203 STATE of New Jersey (County of Bergen), Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Nazario VENTURA, Defendant, and Safety National Casualty Corporation, as Surety, Defendant-Appellant. State of New Jersey (County of Middlesex), Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Leidy Granados, Defendant, and Lexington National Insurance Corp., (Surety), Defendant-Appellant. A-45 September Te
Firstservice Residential Fla., Inc. v. Rodriguezpublic domain
HARRIS, J. In this premises liability action, FirstService Residential Florida, Inc. ("FirstService"), seeks certiorari relief, requesting that this Court quash the trial court's order compelling production of its work product (i.e., photographs). Because FirstService failed to properly preserve its claim of error for appellate review, we must deny the petition. Carmen Rodriguez filed a premises liability lawsuit ag
Ventura v. Venturapublic domain
Jacob J. Schwartzwald, J. Defendant wife moves to cancel a lis pendens filed by the plaintiff husband in conjunction with his action to impress an equitable lien on certain real property belonging to her. The verified complaint states that the parties herein had agreed that plaintiff was to have an equitable lien for moneys he was required to expend in excess of the rental receipts for the use, occupa
Firstservice Residential Fla., Inc. v. Rodriguezpublic domain
HARRIS, J. In this premises liability action, FirstService Residential Florida, Inc. ("FirstService"), seeks certiorari relief, requesting that this Court quash the trial court's order compelling production of its work product (i.e., photographs). Because FirstService failed to properly preserve its claim of error for appellate review, we must deny the petition. Carmen Rodriguez filed a premises liability lawsuit ag
United States v. Ventura-Melendezpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 01-1400 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. MARÍA DEL CARMEN VENTURA-MELÉNDEZ, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Juan M. Pérez-Giménez, U.S. District Judge]
De Ventura v. Keithpublic domain
169 F.Supp.2d 390 (2001) Nora DE VENTURA, et al. v. Officer Jason G. KEITH, et al. No. Civ.A. DKC 99-3588. United States District Court, D. Maryland. September 21, 2001. *391 *392 Gordon G. Ovington, Ovington & Ovington, Rockville, MD, for plaintiff. Joann Robertson, Montgomery Coun
*594Opinion STONE, P. J. —The instant case involves two appeals consolidated on this court’s motion. Edwin E. (Edwin) appeals from a judgment terminating his rights to custody and control of his biological child, Cheryl E. (Cheryl). (Civ. Code, § 232.) County of Ventura (County), Public Social Services Agency (PSSA), and Adoption Worker (AW) appeal from
United States v. Santana-Alonsopublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Vicente Santana-Alonso has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Santana-Alonso has filed an untimely response, which we construe as
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge: The petitioner Fredy Orlando Ventura petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision dismissing his appeal of the denial of his asylum application. He contends the record compels a finding that he established past persecution on account of imputed political opinion, and the INS’s evidence of changed country conditions fai
Moreno Martínez v. Martínez Venturapublic domain
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO Iris Nilda Moreno Martínez Apelada Apelación vs. 2006 TSPR 105 Carmen Martínez Ventura, 168 DPR ____ Rafael A. Moreno Vélez, Et Al. Apelantes Número del Caso: AC-2005-8 Fecha: 28 de junio de 2006 Tribunal de Apelaciones: Región Judicial de Aguadilla Juez Ponente: