Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Carmen J. Pool”
State v. Carmenpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Carmen, 2013-Ohio-3325.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : APPEAL NO. C-120692 TRIAL NO. B-1200408 Plaintiff-Appellee, : vs. : O P I N I O N. CHARLES CARMEN,
Hernandez, Maria Del Carmenpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS PD-1879-06 MARIA DEL CARMEN HERNANDEZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Discretionary Review of Case 04-05-00634-CR of the Fourth Court of Appeals,
Carmen Jean-Baptiste v. District of Columbiapublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, District Judge. A jury found for plaintiff Carmen Jean-Baptiste on her Title VII and D.C. Human Rights Act (DCHRA) sexual harassment claims, her Title VII and DCHRA retaliation claims, and her D.C. Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) claims. Jean-Baptiste now moves [187] for equitable relief pursuant to thos
Del Carmen Hernandez v. Statepublic domain
273 S.W.3d 685 (2008) Maria DEL CARMEN HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas. No. PD-1879-06. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. October 15, 2008. Rehearing Denied December 17, 2008. Lori O. Rodriguez, Asst. Public Defender, San Antonio, for appellant. Daniel Thornberry, Asst. Crim. D.A., San Antonio, Jeffrey L. Van Horn, State's Atty.
Hernandez, Maria Del Carmenpublic domain
Death Opinion IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Carmen Jean-Baptiste v. District of Columbiapublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge. Following a six-day trial in which the jury returned a verdict on all counts and a $3.5 million compensatory award for plaintiff Carmen Jean-Baptiste, the defendant District of Columbia (“the District”) filed this Motion [188] for a New Trial, a New Trial on Damages or, in the Alternative, for R
Com. v. Murray, J.public domain
J-A27012-20 2021 PA Super 47 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. JOSEPHE MURRAY Appellant No. 151 EDA 2019 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence Entered December 18, 2018 In the Court of Common Pleas of Philad
Com. v. Murray, J.public domain
J-A27012-20 2021 PA Super 47 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. JOSEPHE MURRAY Appellant No. 151 EDA 2019 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence Entered December 18, 2018 In the Court of Common Pleas of Philad
INSURANCE OF STATE OF PENNSYLAVANIA v. Muropublic domain
The Texas Workers' Compensation Act authorizes the award of lifetime income benefits to employees who lose certain body parts or suffer certain injuries in work-related accidents. The specific body parts and injuries that qualify an employee for this type of benefit are enumerated in section 408.161 of the act. See TEX. LAB. CODE § 408.161(a)(1)-(7). That enumeration includes, among others, "loss [or lost use] of both feet at or above the an
*1204This appeal involves the zoning of one portion of a 382-acre parcel of real property, located in the Town of Huntington, formerly occupied by a State of New York facility. During the 1990s, the property was zoned “R-80,” which, with certain exceptions not relevant here, permits only single-family dwellings. In October 1999 the State of New York sold the entire parcel of real property to the
SFR INV.'S POOL 1, LLC VS. U.S. BANK, N.A.public domain
135 Nev., Advance Opinion 45 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, A No. 74532 NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; AND COPPER RIDGE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, Appellants, FILED vs.
802 F.2d 1108 21 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1233 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Bradford S. TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Vincent Carmen PINTO, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 85-1274, 85-1278. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 10, 1986.<
Fairhurst, J. ¶1 Rosaura Del Carmen Rodriguez appeals the Washington State Bar Association’s (WSBA) recommendation that she be disbarred for submitting documents with forged signatures to a tribunal and later denying it under oath to avoid discipline. Although the presumptive sanction for this misconduct is disbarment, the hearing officer recommended a two-year suspension based largely on Rodriguez’s relative inexperience in the
Fl LE IN CLERKS OFFICE IUPR!:ME COURT, STATE OF WASHNmlN QUC l g. 2013 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON In the Matter of the Disciplinary ) Proceeding Against ) No. 200,960-3 ) ROSAURA DEL CARMEN ) EnBanc RODRIGUEZ, ) ) Filed JUL 1 8 Z013~ an Attorney at L
Carmen Elaine Perry v. Doyle P. Perrypublic domain
Opinion filed September 24, 2009 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________ No. 11-08-00017-CV __________ CARMEN ELAINE PERRY, Appellant V. DOYLE P. PERRY, Appellee On Appeal from the 411th
Carmen Elaine Perry v. Doyle P. Perrypublic domain
Opinion filed September 24, 2009 <
Carmen Jean-Baptiste v. District of Columbiapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) GARRINA BYRD, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) 1:06-cv-00522 (RCL)
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS THOMAS J. FRAGA, Appellant, v. CARMEN DRAKE and JAMES DRAKE and PI CROWLEY, INDEPENDENT CO-EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JOYCE DOBKINS, DECEASED,
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § THOMAS J. FRAGA, No. 08-06-00295-CV § Appellant, Appeal from
Verdell Carmen Hamlet v. State of Arizonapublic domain
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO VERDELL CARMEN HAMLET, Petitioner, v. STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent. No. 2 CA-SA 2025-0062 Filed December 9, 2025 Special Action Proceeding Gila Co