Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-04-00196-CV Carmen B. AVILA, Appellant v. Ynocencio A. AVILA, Appellee From the 229th Judicial District Court, Jim Hogg County, Texas Trial Court No. CC-03-85

Order filed August 10, 2021 In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-20-00133-CV ____________ MILAGRO DEL CARMEN MONTESINO AVILA, Appellant V. FIESTA MART, L.L.C., Appellee On Appeal from the 164th District Court

PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Israel Lara Avila has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Avila has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jorge Luis Gallegos-Avila has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gallegos-Avila has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jose Guadalupe Vega-Avila has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Vega-Avila has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Chaidez v. United States, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1103, 185 L.Ed.2d 149 (2013); Hernandez v. State, — So.3d (Fla.2012). GROSS, GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

O’SCANNLAIN; Circuit Judge: In this case involving claims of age and employment discrimination we must resolve several issues of first impression. I Julio Mercado-Garcia (“Mercado”) was fifty years old and had been in the employ of the Ponce Federal Bank (“the Bank”) for eleven years when he was discharged from his position as Vi

OPINION OF THE COURT Gerard M. Weisberg, J. On this motion we must determine the degree to which *1069disclosure of information regarding a party’s experts was expanded by a recent amendment to the CPLR, enacted as part of the comprehensive reform of laws pertaining to medical malpractice. (L 1985, ch 294.) This legislation is also applicable to pe

OPINION OF THE COURT Gerard M. Weisberg, J. Claimants, Carmen and Hector Avila, have moved for permission to file a late claim against defendant, State of New York. Opposition is based primarily on a quotation from a 1976 decision of the Appellate Division, Third Department. Because this argument has recently and frequently been urged on similar applications, the time has now come to put it to rest.

KICKOFF, Justice, concurring on denial of rehearing. Appellant, Maria Del Carmen Marquez Avila, as next friend of Christina Jimenez, filed suit against the appellees, St. Luke’s Lutheran Hospital and its nurse, Marilyn Abel, for the wrongful death of Christina’s biological father. Because the appellees had been sued in a prior suit by Christina’s siblings, the appellees moved for summary judgment based on co

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 26, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D21-0565 Lower Tribunal No. F89-38288 ________________ The State of Florida, Appellant,

EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO In re: 2017 TSPR 125 Carmen Cardona Rodríguez 198 DPR ____ Número del Caso: TS-6202 Fecha: 27 de junio de 2017 Abogado de la parte promovida: Lcdo. Carlos S. Dávila Vélez Oficina de Inspección de Notarías: Lcdo. Manuel E. Avila de Jesús Director Materia: La suspensión será efectiva el 5 de julio de 2017, fecha en que se le n

EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO In re: 2017 TSPR 50 María del Carmen López Castro 197 DPR ____ Número del Caso: TS-13,281 Fecha: 4 de abril de 2017 Abogado de la Promovente: Lcdo. Víctor Pizarro Figueroa Oficina de Inspección de Notarías: Lcdo. Manuel E. Avila de Jesús Director Materia: Conducta Profesional – La suspensión será efectiva el 5 de abril de 20

TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge. Can a person, licensed to practice law, be in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., for sending dunning collection letters that purport to be from an “attorney”? This is one of two interesting questions we address today in this case involving Raul Avila (and a class of similarly s

per curiam; En observancia con el proceso dispuesto en la Regla 15 del Reglamento del Tribunal Supremo, 4 LPRA Ap. XXI-B, y acogiendo la recomendación del Comisionado Especial (Comisionado) nombrado por esta Curia, nos ve-mos obligados a suspender preventivamente al Ledo. José T. Marrero Rivera del ejercicio de la abogacía. A continuación, procedemos a exponer los hechos del caso ante nuestra consideración.

OPINION OF THE COURT Renee R. Roth, S. Each of the two intestate estates now before the court (the estate of Carmen Ortega and the estate of Monserrate Avila) consists of personal property having a total worth of approximately $1,000. Both estates would thus appear to present classic occasions for “voluntary administration,” i.e., the informal route to settling small estates under article 13 of the Surroga

OPINION The appellant in this case made certain qualified admissions to a police officer through an interpreter. The police officer was permitted to testify to those statements, even though the State did not call the interpreter to the stand. We granted the State's petition for discretionary review to address whether the interpreter's rendition of the appellant's statement to the police officer constituted an additional, objectionable layer of hears

779 F.Supp. 620 (1991) Julio A. MERCADO GARCIA, Maria Del Carmen Avila Mojica, and the conjugal partnership, Plaintiffs, v. PONCE FEDERAL BANK, F.S.B., Ramiro L. Colon Muñoz, and Jose F. Blasini Lloveras, Defendants. Civ. No. 89-0949 (JAF). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. October 16, 1991. *621

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 25, 2021 No. 04-20-00062-CV IN THE INTEREST OF K.M., B.M. AND A.B.M., MINOR CHILDREN, From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019-CI-09419 Honorable Aaron Haas, Judge Presiding

BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, J. *133Labor Code section 226.2,1 which became effective January 1, 2016, addresses the manner in which piece-rate employees are to be compensated for rest and recovery periods and other *134nonproductive t