⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Carlton Dwight Hill”

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2013-11-13 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs August 6, 2013 JASON MARTINDILL v. DWIGHT BARBEE, WARDEN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lauderdale County No. 6629 Joseph H. Walker III, Judge No. W2012-02624-CCA-R3-HC - Filed November 13, 2013 The Petitioner, Jason Martindill, appeals the Lauderdale County Circuit Court’s summary dis
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2013-03-05 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs January 9, 2013 EDGAR BAILEY, JR. v. DWIGHT BARBEE, WARDEN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lauderdale County No. 6584 Joseph H. Walker, III, Judge No. W2012-01729-CCA-R3-HC - Filed March 5, 2013 The Petitioner, Edgar Bailey, Jr., appeals the Lauderdale County Circuit Court’s summary dismi
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1920-05-04 · Published · cited 2× · 111 A. 75; 79 N.H. 416; 1920 N.H. LEXIS 30
The primary inquiry here, as in the case of all wills, is what intent was expressed by the language used by the testatrix. No evidence was introduced and the case stands upon the language of the will. It is argued on behalf of Walter Carlton that the will gives the principal of the trust to him, independent of any decision to that effect by Edward. But a critical examination of the paragraph in question fails to produce any evidence to sustain the contention. The principal of the bequest goes
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004-11-18 · Published · cited 14× · 390 F.3d 1327; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 24088; 2004 WL 2610522
HILL, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal under Rule 23(f), Fed. R.Civ.P., from the district court’s order certifying a national class of approximately 70 million automobile insurance policyholders. Plaintiffs’ complaint seeks treble damages under the federal antitrust laws for alleged premium overcharges. For the following reasons, we have determined that we have no jurisdiction i
Pond v. Pondpublic domain
Wyoming Supreme Court · 2009-11-06 · Published · cited 5× · 2009 WY 134; 218 P.3d 650; 2009 Wyo. LEXIS 147; 2009 WL 3678252
218 P.3d 650 (2009) 2009 WY 134 Dwayne Earl POND, Appellant (Defendant), v. Cathy Jo POND, Appellee (Plaintiff). No. S-08-0253. Supreme Court of Wyoming. November 6, 2009. *651 Representing Appellant: Dwight F. Hurich, Hurich Law Office, Gillette, Wyoming. Representing Appellee: Rex O. Arney and Vin
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2018-01-10 · Published · cited 0×
01/10/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs October 3, 2017 JULIUS PERKINS v. MIKE PARRIS, WARDEN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County No. 16-CR-10262 R. Lee Moore, Jr., Judge ___________________________________
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2018-04-02 · Published · cited 0×
04/02/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 13, 2017 LADARIUS L. REFFEGEE v. BLAIR LEIBACH, WARDEN Appeal from the Criminal Court for Trousdale County No. 2017-CV-4606 John D. Wootten, Jr., Judge ___________________________________
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015-03-25 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 18, 2014 BILLY L. GROOMS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Cocke County No. 4544 Ben W. Hooper, II, Judge No. E2014-01228-CCA-R3-HC-FILED-MARCH 25, 2015 The petitioner, Billy L. Grooms, appeals the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2013-12-02 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 24, 2013 CLARENCE D. SCHREANE v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 287825 Rebecca Stern, Judge No. E2013-01161-CCA-R3-HC - Filed December 2, 2013 The petitioner, Clarence D. Schreane, acting pro se, appeals the Hamilton County Crimin
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2015-07-16 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 19, 2015 DEERIC MCAFEE v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 101445 Mary Beth Leibowitz, Judge No. E2014-01829-CCA-R3-PC – Filed July 16, 2015 The petitioner, Deeric McAfee, filed in the Knox County Criminal Court a petition for post-co
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997-10-15 · Published · cited 4× · 127 F.3d 1081; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 28575; 75 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 565
127 F.3d 1081 75 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 565 James R. BAKER, Charles W. Baker, Jr., Jeffery L. Beran,William M. Blaesing, Paul Bolen, Robert W. Bowen Iii,Charles Brown, Jr., Ronald Bryant, Fred W. Budinger,Frederick W. Butler, Kenneth D. Clonts, Michael J. Connors,Daniel J. Coonan Iii, Robert S. Cope, Wayne D. Corder,Charles Cushion, Dale A. Davidson, Oak Deberg, Jesse C.Dehay, Jr., John C. Dun
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006-03-20 · Published · cited 0× · 497 F. Supp. 2d 862; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96480; 2006 WL 4639452
497 F.Supp.2d 862 (2006) Amanda CABANISS, Administrator of the ESTATE OF Kevin CABANISS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF RIVERSIDE, et al., Defendants. No. 3:04cv218. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. March 20, 2006. *863 *864 *865
Gratz v. Bollingerpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005-01-27 · Published · cited 32× · 353 F. Supp. 2d 929; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1104; 2005 WL 195382
353 F.Supp.2d 929 (2005) Jennifer GRATZ and Patrick Hamacher, for themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Lee BOLLINGER, et al., Defendants, and Ebony Patterson, et al., Intervening Defendants. No. 97-75231. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. January 27, 2005. *930
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2023-09-07 · Published · cited 0×
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DAVID KRIEGER, ANDREW KRIEGER, JAMES FOR PUBLICATION SPERLING, and MARGARET SPERLING, on September 7, 2023 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly 9:05 a.m. Si
Davis v. Rumsfeldpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003-06-04 · Published · cited 0× · 66 F. App'x 203
Judgment PER CURIAM. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
California Court of Appeal · 1994-05-25 · Published · cited 18× · 25 Cal. App. 4th 134; 30 Cal. Rptr. 343; 30 Cal. Rptr. 2d 343; 94 Daily Journal DAR 7004; 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3758; 1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 504
25 Cal.App.4th 134 (1994) 30 Cal. Rptr. 343 SAN MIGUEL CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. GRAY DAVIS, as State Controller, etc., et al., Defendants and Respondents; HARRY WEINBERG, as Superintendent, etc., et al., Real Parties in Interest. Docket No. C016756. Court of Appeals of California, Third District. May 25,
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999-03-05 · Published · cited 4× · 174 F.3d 1087; 1999 Colo. J. C.A.R. 1703; 22 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1073; 160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2650; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 3454
174 F.3d 1087 160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2650, 137 Lab.Cas. P 10,390,23 Employee Benefits Cas. 1073, 1999 CJ C.A.R. 1703 Terry A. GARVIN; John McGrail; Ferdnand Adamson; EdithAitken; Marva Akins; Douglas R. Allen; Shirley Allen;Loren Alm; Sheila Altman; Cornelious Anderson; Peggy C.Anderson; Claudette B. Anterin; Esther Arnold; Kenneth G.Arsenault; Jerry M. Ashley; Lindy Ashley; Johnice M.
District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997-12-01 · Published · cited 28× · 177 F.R.D. 216; 1997 WL 751713
*221 OPINION WOLIN, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the motion of petitioner The Prudential Insurance Company of America (“Prudential”), to enforce the Final Order and Judgment of this Court and to dismiss pending actions or to enjoin pending or threatened actions by certain class members who failed to opt out of the Clas
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2021-07-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STONE & PAPER INVESTORS, LLC, ) individually and derivatively on behalf of ) CLOVIS HOLDINGS LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2018-0394-PAF ) RICHARD BLANCH, VIVIANNA BLANC
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997-10-15 · Published · cited 0× · 127 F.3d 1081; 1997 WL 632044
Before ARCHER, Chief Judge, CLEVENGER, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges. CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge. This is a military backpay case that is brought by 83 retired United States Air Force colonels. These colonels challenge their selection for retirement by a Selective Early Retirement Board (SERB) in January 1992. The basis of their complaint is that the charge given to the SERB, on its face and as applied by the