Cases

FAIR, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. On August 2, 2010, the County Court of Madison County found Aaron Carlson guilty of careless driving and driving under the influence, first offense. Carlson appealed his DUI conviction to the Madison County Circuit Court, which affirmed. Carlson now further appeals his DUI conviction and makes the following contentions: (1) the circuit court erred in affirming his conviction a

The plaintiff Provo River Water Users' Association brought this action to condemn a tract of 18.75 acres of land in Wasatch County. Part of this tract is to be flooded by a reservoir being constructed in Provo canyon, and the remaining part was taken for relocation of a railroad necessitated by flooding an area where the tracks were formerly located. This improvement is connected with the Deer Creek reclamation project. At the time of trial and for some years prior thereto, the defenda

ISHEE, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. In January 2015, John Longest was arrested for careless driving, open container in a motor vehicle, and driving under the influence (DUI), Longest pleaded no contest and was convicted by the Municipal Court of Florence. He appealed his convictions to the County Court of Rankin County, wherein a bench trial de novo was hel

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-KM-01581-COA JAMES SIMS A/K/A JAMES ARTHUR SIMS, JR. APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/09/2019 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. CELESTE EMBREY WILSON COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: DESOTO COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY

957 So.2d 981 (2007) Leon D. TAGGART v. STATE of Mississippi. No. 2006-KA-00704-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. June 7, 2007. *983 David Clay Vanderburg, attorney for appellant. Office of the Attorney General by Deshun Terrell Martin, attorney for appellee. EN BANC. CARLSON, Justice, for the Court.

Madsen, J. Defendant Keith Martin contends that his case should have been dismissed due to the State’s failure to comply with his right to a speedy disposition, pursuant to RCW 13.40.130 and JuCR 7.12(a) or in the alternative that the court lost jurisdiction to sentence him because the hearing was scheduled more than 21 days after Defendant’s guilty plea. We conclude that Martin was not prejudiced by the delay and affirm his con

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2006-KA-00704-SCT LEON D. TAGGART v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/12/2006 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ROBERT P. CHAMBERLIN COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: DESOTO COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: DAVID CLAY VANDERBURG ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

969 P.2d 450 (1999) 137 Wash.2d 149 STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Keith MARTIN, Petitioner. No. 65454-9. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued February 24, 1998. Decided January 7, 1999. *451 Washington Appellate Project, Stella S. Buder, Seattle, for Petitioner. Norm M

890 So.2d 901 (2004) Xavier BROWN v. STATE of Mississippi. No. 2002-DP-01548-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. September 2, 2004. Rehearing Denied November 4, 2004. *907 Office of Capital Post-Conviction Counsel by Andre de Gruy, Scott Joseph Schwartz, attorneys for appellant. Office of the Attorney Gener

Complainants appeal from a decree granting relief to a respondent on his cross bill wherein he seeks to have declared in his favor a resulting trust on a parcel of land. Complainants commenced this suit by filing their bill of complaint praying that two parcels of land be sold for division of the proceeds of the sale among the complainants and respondents. There are four complainants and three respondents. They are the seven children of George W. Knapp, sometimes referred to as

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2002-DP-01548-SCT XAVIER BROWN v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 6/20/2002 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. KEITH STARRETT COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: LAMAR COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: OFFICE OF CAPITAL POST-CONVICTION

The appeal in this case is prosecuted by appellant, Mrs. Romie Durden, from a final decree of the circuit court, in equity, adjudging and decreeing that certain shares of stock in the Ohio Edison Company, an *Page 497 Ohio corporation, standing in the name of Lucy Tom Moseley, and the dividends paid on said stock since the death of the life tenant, as well as two certain promissory notes executed by Mrs. J. B. Simmons to J. Tom Moseley, deceased, were the

This is an action in equity, brought by the plaintiff, the appellant, to rescind a subscription or purchase of capital stock and to recover back moneys paid by him thereon. It is in substance alleged in the complaint that the defendant Utah Steel Corporation was a domestic corporation organized in July, 1919, and that the defendant Burke was appointed its receiver in July, 1922, that in the latter part of 1921 and in January, 1922, the corporation entered upon a campaign of selling its capita

This action was instituted in the district court of Oklahoma county by A.B. Harn, as receiver of the Merchants Planters Insurance Company, a corporation, againts Simon Smith. Mary F. Smith, Salome Kate Mercer, O.E. Hayes, Mary G. Hayes, and Henry H. Englebright, to recover of the defendants Simon Smith and Mary F. Smith the sum of $10,000, alleged to be due upon a promissory note, and for foreclosure of a mortgage covering certain real *Page 138 estate i