Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Carlos L Williams”
United States v. Carlos L. Carpenterpublic domain
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. While one officer was giving Carlos Carpenter a ticket for evading a red light, another arrived with a drug-detection dog. The dog’s alert provided probable cause to search the car for drugs, which were duly found. Carpenter pleaded guilty to possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute, reserving the right to contest on appeal the denial of h
ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING, REHEARING EN BANC, CERTIFICATION,' OR CLARIFICATION KELSEY, J. Following publication of our opinion, Respondent Romero filed a motion for rehearing, rehearing en banc, and certification; and the Office of the Judge of Compensation Claims (OJCC) filed a motion for rehearing, rehearing en banc, or clarification. We grant the OJCC’s
Maunz v. San Carlos Correctional Facilitypublic domain
ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY * Jerome A. Holmes, Circuit Judge William A. Maunz, a state prisoner proceeding pro se,1 seeks a certificate of ap-*398pealability (“COA”) to challenge the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carlos Williams v. State of Indianapublic domain
SULLIVAN, Justice. Defendant Carlos Williams was convicted of murder for his participation in the shooting death of another man. We find that the testimony of two eyewitnesses was sufficient evidence to support his conviction. Background The facts most favorable to the verdict indicate that on May 5, 1999, at a h
Williams v. Perezpublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Williams v. Perezpublic domain
Former decision, 134 S.Ct. 644.Petition for rehearing denied.
Carlos Bringas-Rodriguez v. Jefferson Sessionspublic domain
CLIFTON, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment: I agree with the conclusion of the majority opinion that the petition for review filed by Carlos Alberto Bringas-Rodriguez should be granted and the matter remanded to the BIA for further proceedings. The basis for my conclusion is much narrower than that adopted by the majority opinion, however. In my view, the majority opinion does not respect the prope
Carlos Reyna v. International Bank of Commercepublic domain
KING, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-Appellee Carlos Reyna brought an action on his own behalf and on behalf of other similarly situated individuals against his former employer, Defendant-Appellant International Bank of Commerce, contending that IBC violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by failing to pay proper overtime rates. IBC moved to compel arbitration of Reyna’s claim, but the di
Carlos Williams v. Louis DeJoypublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-2472 CARLOS A. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster General, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for
Carlos Urquilla-Diaz v. Kaplan Universitypublic domain
DUBINA, Circuit Judge: In this consolidated qui tam action, three relators brought claims under the False Claims Act against an educational institution for falsely certifying to the government that it was in compliance with various federal statutes and regulations to receive financial-aid funds from the federal fisc. The district court ruled against the relators. After final ju
in Re: Carlos Demond Williamspublic domain
NO. 12-21-00133-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS IN RE: § CARLOS DEMOND WILLIAMS, § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING RELATOR § MEMORANDUM OPINION
San Carlos Apache Tribe v. United Statespublic domain
NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, dissenting. For decades the United States stood together with the San Carlos Apache *1356Tribe, in federal and state court, pressing the position that the 1935 Globe Equity Decree did not finally determine the Tribe’s water rights in the Gila River. When the issue was resolved in 2006 in the Arizona Supreme Court, and the Tribe’s
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas OPINION No. 04-13-00558-CV BRUINGTON ENGINEERING, LTD., Appellant v. PEDERNAL ENERGY, L.L.C., Appellee
Williams v. Statepublic domain
ROTHENBERG, J. Although we note that the defendant, Alvin Williams, has conscientiously reported for over ten years as required by section 954.0435(14)(b) of the Florida Statutes, we find that the trial court correctly concluded that Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.040,1 which extends a deadline where the deadline falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, is not applicable to the reportin
Williams v. Carlospublic domain
FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT 0F COLUMBIA NUV l 5 2012 KAY WILLIAMS, ) C?)l‘irri(s ceta Plaintiff, § v. § Civil Action No. JUAN CARLOS GONZALES, et al., § Defendants. § MEMORANDUM OPINION The plaintiff has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis and a pro se complaint. She alleges that the defendants "have attempted to take advantage of and defraud [her] by knowingly misrepresenting the facts" and by failing to make "full disclosure" with respect to a motor
United States v. Vanston Venner Williamspublic domain
JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judge: In the waning hours of May 9, 2015, the crew of the Rasputin—defendants Yanston Yenner Williams, Mario Alin Bent Barker, Carlos Clemente Henry Taylor, Edince Garcia Cardoza, and Hendrick Guillermo Linero Duffis—were traveling away from Colon, Panama when, much like their vessel’s namesake, their luck ran out. A Coast Guard cutter approached the Rasputi
OPINION Opinion by: SANDEE BRYAN MARION, Justice. In the underlying lawsuit, Pedernal Energy L.L.C. sued Bruington Engineering Ltd. and three other entities (“the Schlum-berger entities”) for damages allegedly caused to an oil well and the surrounding formation. Because Pedernal’s lawsuit was for damages arising out of the provision of
Williams v. City of Miamipublic domain
SUAREZ, J. Dennis L. Williams seeks to reverse a final summary judgment granted to the City of Miami. We affirm, as Williams failed to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to bringing his claim in circuit court, pursuant to the Florida Whistle-blower’s Act. Williams retired from the Miami Police Department [“Department”] after twenty five years of service, and continued to serve as a member of the De
Williams v. Wash. Dep't of Corr.public domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Williams v. Busspublic domain
538 F.3d 683 (2008) Carlos K. WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Edwin G. BUSS, Respondent-Appellant. No. 07-1092. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued January 9, 2008. Decided August 14, 2008. Michael L. Parkinson (argued), Lafayette, IN, for Petitioner-Appellee. Stephen R. Creason, Kelly A. Miklos (argued), Office of the A