Cases

Kanne, Circuit Judge. Carleton Harris was injured while working at the Allen County Juvenile Center. After he reached maximum medical improvement, both his disability benefits and his employment were terminated. Harris subsequently sued the Allen County Board of Commissioners and the Allen Superior Court for alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("the ADA"). The onl

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17-2577 CARLETON HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALLEN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

PER CURIAM. This action was filed June 1, 1967 against the Justices of the Supreme Court of Arkansas in the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. The complaint alleged, in substance, that an opinion of the Supreme Court of Arkansas in Roberson v. Hamilton, [240 Ark. 898] 405 S.W.2d 253 (1966), was libelous

938 A.2d 120 (2007) Bukk G. CARLETON v. EDGEWOOD HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM OWNERS' ASSOCIATION. No. 2006-404. Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Argued: June 20, 2007. Opinion Issued: November 8, 2007. *121 Decato Law Office, of Lebanon (R. Peter Decato on the brief and orally), for the plaintiff. McLane, Graf, Rau

ORDER Patrick J. Schütz, United States District Judge Plaintiff Elizabeth Shank alleges that, while she was a student at defendant Carleton College (“Carleton”), she was raped by fellow students on two occasions. In this action, she brings various statutory and common-law claims against Carleton, including a claim under the Education Amendments of 1972 (“Title IX”), 20 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq. Carleton no

(2008) Tony HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. STONECREST CARE AUTO CENTER, LLC dba Shell; Vincent D. Manno, Trustee of the Vincent D. Manno Trust; Carol Ann Carleton, Filomena R. Buckingham and Amelia M. Lucas, Trustees of the Carol A. Carleton Trust, Trustees of the Filomena R; Buckingham Trust, and Trustees of the Amelia M. Lucas Trust; Larry M. Lucas and Amelia M. Lucas, Trustees of the Lucas Family Trust, Defendants. Case No. 04CV25

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75, inter alla, to confirm an arbitration award, (1) Harry Carleton appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Palella, J.), entered November 24, 1986, as granted the petition insofar as it sought confirmation of the arbitrator’s award and denied his motion to vacate or modify the arbitrator’s award, and (2) the petitioner cross-appeals from so much

472 F.Supp.2d 1208 (2007) Tony HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. STONECREST CARE AUTO CENTER, LLC dba Shell; Vincent D. Manno, Trustee of the Vincent D. Manno Trust; Carol Ann Carleton, Filomena R. Buckingham and Amelia M. Lucas, Trustees of the Carol A. Carleton Trust, Trustees of the Filomena R. Buckingham Trust, and Trustees of the Amelia M. Lucas Trust; Larry M. Lucas and Amelia M. Lucas, Trustees of the Lucas Family Trust, Defendants.

OPINION KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Gary Daugherty appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees City of Toledo and Toledo’s former Mayor Carlton Finkbeiner (collectively, “the City”) on Daugherty’s Title VII and Ohio state-law race-discrimination claim and the district court’s grant of

USCA1 Opinion UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 96-1224 DARLENE F. MORRISON, Plaintiff, Appellee, v.

36 Mass. App. Ct. 137 (1994) 629 N.E.2d 321 COMMONWEALTH vs. THOMAS CARLETON. No. 93-P-484. Appeals Court of Massachusetts, Middlesex. November 2, 1993. February 28, 1994. Present: JACOBS, GILLERMAN, & PORADA, JJ. *138 Dwight G. Duncan (Thomas E. Finnerty with him)

PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from a Tax Court decision 1 finding petitioners liable for deficiencies in income tax due for the taxable years 1970 and 1971, and for additions to tax due for those same years. The additions were imposed due to violation of 26 U.S.C. § 6651(a)

Wilkins, J. Lynn Marie Carleton and Arthur T. Kelley, Jr., were killed on November 10, 1985, when a speeding motor vehicle operated by Garret Nagle, a drunk driver, failed to negotiate a curve on Route 30 in Wayland and struck the vehicle in which the plaintiffs’ decedents were traveling. The plaintiffs’ actions are based on the claim that Charles Cooper, a Framingham police office

34 Mass. App. Ct. 686 (1993) 615 N.E.2d 588 MARY G. CARLETON, administratrix,[1] vs. TOWN OF FRAMINGHAM (and a companion case[2]). No. 91-P-1311. Appeals Court of Massachusetts, Middlesex. March 15, 1993. June 29, 1993. Present: ARMSTRONG, BROWN, & PORADA, JJ. Philip B. Benjamin, Specia

SIMPSON, Circuit Judge: In these consolidated appeals the taxpayer, E. L. Harris, Sr., seeks to overturn a district court order enforcing four summonses issued by an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) special agent pursuant to § 76021 of the Internal Revenue Code. Harris ar-' gues (1) that the district judge abused his discretion by denying taxpayer pretrial discovery; and (2) that the district judge

CAMPBELL, Senior Circuit Judge. These appeals and cross-appeals relate to actions heard in the district court arising from federal and state claims of sexual harassment, sex discrimination, and disability discrimination brought by Darlene F. Morrison against her employer Carleton Woolen Mills,- Inc. (the “Company”), and two of her supervisors, Michael Riley and Lee Moody. We aff

256 Md. 185 (1969) 260 A.2d 22 HARRIS v. ARLEN PROPERTIES, INC., ET AL. [No. 65, September Term, 1969.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided December 22, 1969. The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and BARNES, FINAN, SINGLEY and SMITH, JJ. Carleton U. Edwards, II, with whom was Stanley M. Karlin on the brief, for ap

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS KATHLEEN H. SANBERG, CHIEF UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE This adversary proceeding originates from the failure of the Petters Ponzi *158scheme orchestrated by Thomas J. Petters and his associates, the history of which has been well documented in this district as well as others nationwide

PER CURIAM: Based upon the well-reasoned opinion of the district court, John Hilsman Investments, LLC, et al. v. Quality Properties, LLC, 500 B.R. 105 (N.D.Ala.2013), this case is affirmed. AFFIRMED.

MEMORANDUM OPINION KARON OWEN BOWDRE, District Judge. This matter comes before the court on appeal from an Order of the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Alabama, In re Quality Properties, LLC, Case No. 10-42783-JJR-ll.1 The Bankruptcy Court, in an Order entered January 31, 2011, held that Quality’s leasehold interest continued despite its assig