Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBIN M. MERIWEATHER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE On January 10? 2017, this case was referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.2(a), for resolution of any discovery dispute, 1 Pending before the Court is the Doe Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel

MEMORANDUM OPINION THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge. This case involves the one-day removal of two young children from an abusive home by an agency specifically tasked with protecting abused children. This removal is the locus of Plaintiffs’ myriad constitutional and common law claims and the following motions currently pending before this Court

USCA11 Case: 19-13990 Date Filed: 12/14/2020 Page: 1 of 32 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-13990 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:19-mc-20493-UU SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,

PER CURIAM. The Supreme Court vacated our judgment — Doe v. University of Illinois, 138 F.3d 653 (1998) — and remanded this case for further consideration in light of Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education, 526 U.S. 629, 119 S.Ct. 1661, 143 L.Ed.2d 839 (1999). Upon that reconsideration, we reinstate and affirm that portion of our prior decision rejecting the University of Illinois’ claim of Eleven

CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge. Appellee/eross-appellant Jane Doe was a student at University High School in Urba-na, Illinois.1 Although University High is a public school, it is affiliated with the defendant University of Illinois, which has responsibility for overseeing the school’s -administration. During a period from January 1993 through early May 1994, while a student at University High, Jane Doe w

489 F.3d 966 In re Carla FREEMAN,Carla Freeman, Petitioner,v.United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Respondent,Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General; Michael Chertoff; William McNamee; Joe Meisenheimer, Real Parties in Interest. No. 06-75539. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Filed May 29, 2007.

ACCEPTED 12-15-00121-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 10/15/2015 9:45:20 PM Pam

138 F.3d 653 124 Ed. Law Rep. 812 Jane DOE, a minor, John Doe, individually and as father andnext friend of Jane Doe, and Janet Doe,individually and as mother and nextfriend of Jane Doe, Plaintiffs-Appellees,United States of America, Intervening Appellee,v.UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, a public corporation, Defendant-Appellant.Jane DOE, a minor, John Doe, individually and as father andnext frie

342 F.3d 1057 Lynne Meredith; Gayle Bybee; Jenifer Meredith; Bernadette Keller; Carla Figaro, The People of California, ex rel., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Andrew Erath, Defendant-Appellant. No. 02-55021. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 6, 2003 — Pasadena, California. Filed September 8, 2003.

208 F.3d 419 (3rd Cir. 2000) RONALD ALEXANDER; FAYE ALEXANDER; FAIR HOUSING PARTNERSHIP OF GREATER PITTSBURGH, INC., Appellants in No. 98-3597v.JOSEPH RIGA; MARIA A. RIGA a/k/a Carla AgnottiRONALD ALEXANDER; FAYE ALEXANDER; FAIR HOUSING PARTNERSHIP OF GREATER PITTSBURGH, INC.,v.JOSEPH RIGA; MARIA A. RIGA a/k/a Carla Agnotti Nos. 98-3597 and 98-3622 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Mailed: September 30, 2005 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ________ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ________ DC Comics v. Pan American Grain Mfg. Co. Inc. ________ Opposition No. 91125404 to application Serial No. 76304037

300 F.3d 530 Jeneva FRAZAR, Etc., et al., Plaintiffs,Linda Frew, as next friend of her minor child, Carla Frew; Maria Ayala, as next friend of her minor children, Christopher Arizola, Leonard Jimenez and Joseph Veliz; Mary Fisher, as next friend of her minor child, Tyrone T. Edwards; Mary Jane Garza, as next friend of her minor children, Hilary Garza and Sarah Renea Garza, Plaintiffs-Appellees.v.Don GILBERT, Etc., et al.,Don Gilbert

134 F.3d 260 S.P., a Citizen of Takoma Park, Maryland, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.The CITY OF TAKOMA PARK, MARYLAND; Robert Phillips, in hisofficial capacity as Chief of the Takoma Park PoliceDepartment; Brian Rich, individually and in his capacity asan officer of the Takoma Park Police Department; Unknownand Unidentified Police Officers of the Takoma PoliceDepartment who were present at and involved in the incidentsco

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER John D. Bates, United States District Judge Currently pending before the Court is [8] defendant Carla Hills’ motion to dis *201 miss this complaint. This is a case brought by Colombian nationals against defendant Carla Hills in her capacity as

OPINION AND ORDER JOHN E. STEELE, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on defendant MasterCard International Incorporated’s (defendant or MasterCard) Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #65) filed on November 10, 2016. Plaintiffs filed a response in opposition (Doc. # 72) and MasterCard replied (Doc. # 77). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied. I

496 F.Supp.2d 477 (2007) Pedro LOZANO, Humberto Hernandez, Rosa Lechuga, Jose Luis Lechuga, John Doe 1, John Doe 3, John Doe 7, Jane Doe 5, Casa Dominica of Hazleton, Inc., Hazleton Hispanic Business Association, and Pennsylvania Statewide Latino Coalition, Plaintiffs v. CITY OF HAZLETON, Defendant. No. 3:06cv1586. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. July 26, 2007.

620 F.3d 170 (2010) Pedro LOZANO; Humberto Hernandez; Rosa Lechuga; John Doe 1; John Doe 2; John Doe 3, a Minor, by His parents; Jane Doe 1; Jane Doe 2; Jane Doe 3; John Doe 4, a Minor by His parents, Brenda Lee Mieles; Casa Dominicana of Hazleton, Inc.; Hazleton Hispanic Business Association; Pennsylvania Statewide Latino Coalition; Jane Doe 5; John Doe 7; Jose Luis Lechuga v. CITY OF HAZLETON, Appellant. No. 07-3531.

*398 MEMORANDUM MUNLEY, District Judge. In this case, the plaintiffs challenge several ordinances enacted by Defendant City of Ha-zleton. A number of the plaintiffs proceed anonymously as John or Jane Does (hereinafter “Doe plaintiffs”). During depositions, an issue arose as to whether the Doe plaintiffs were required to reveal their identi

JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge Pro se Plaintiff Christine M. Mills, a long-time employee of the Library of Congress's Collection Access, Loan Management (CALM) Division, brings this suit alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16, and of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. § 1981a. She principally claims that the Library passed her up for a promotion on the ba

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 21-CV-0545 CHELSEA J. ANDREWS, APPELLANT, V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HOUSING