⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Carl W Hoffman”

District Court, N.D. Texas · 2014-06-03 · Published · cited 16× · 23 F. Supp. 3d 734; 2014 WL 2475923; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75168
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JANE J. BOYLE, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant Katherine Shadle’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (doc. 126), filed on November 12, 2013. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the Motion. I. BACKGROUND This case arises out of an employer’s allegedly fraudulent representations
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014-05-15 · Published · cited 101× · 217 N.J. 368; 89 A.3d 1223; 2014 WL 1923488; 2014 N.J. LEXIS 467
Justice FERNANDEZ-VINA delivered the opinion of the Court. This case involves an appeal from defendant Carl Hreha’s convictions for second-degree computer theft, contrary to N.J.S.A. 2C:20-25(b), and fourth-degree bias intimidation, contrary to N.J.S.A. 2C:16-1. Defendant asserts that the trial court improperly refused t
District Court, W.D. Washington · 2002-05-24 · Published · cited 6× · 209 F. Supp. 2d 1089; 2002 WL 1299991
209 F.Supp.2d 1089 (2002) Donald D. HOFFMAN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. C02-5023RJB. United States District Court, W.D. Washington at Tacoma. May 3, 2002. Order Denying Reconsideration May 24, 2002. *1090 Donald D. Hoffman, Forks, Wa. W. Carl Hankla, U.S. Dept. of Justice Tax Di
Banks v. Hoffmanpublic domain
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023-09-07 · Published · cited 0×
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 20-CV-0318 MORGAN BANKS, et al., APPELLANTS, V. DAVID H. HOFFMAN, et
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988-05-26 · Published · cited 9× · 96 B.R. 46; 1988 WL 148613
96 B.R. 46 (1988) In re Carl HOFFMAN, Debtor. Carl HOFFMAN, Plaintiff, v. CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL BANK, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 86-2879, Adv. No. 87-70. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. May 26, 1988. Gary W. Short, Pittsburgh, Pa., for debtor. Terry Despoy, Gieg and Gieg, Altoona, Pa., for Central Pennsylvania Nat. Bank. J
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996-06-19 · Published · cited 8× · 918 P.2d 861; 141 Or. App. 515; 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 811
918 P.2d 861 (1996) 141 Or. App. 515 Robert W. CARL; Shirley Carl; Guy Carr; First Interstate Bank of Oregon, N.A., as Trustee of the Mildred Carr Trust; Tom Edwards; Dorothy Edwards; Carr Building Corporation, an Oregon corporation; Carr Chevrolet Co., Inc., an Oregon corporation, Appellants, v. OREGON AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY/NORTH PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY; Providence Washington Insurance Company; Safeco Insurance C
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003-01-17 · Published · cited 1× · 315 F.3d 338; 354 U.S. App. D.C. 257; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 647; 2003 WL 131804
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HARRY T. EDWARDS. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON. HARRY T. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge: The action in this case was filed under section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, sections 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15 and 26, the antitrust laws of foreign nations, and international law, on behalf of all fore
Banks v. Hoffmanpublic domain
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025-11-13 · Published · cited 0×
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 20-CV-0318 MORGAN BANKS, et al., APPELLANTS, V. DAVID H. HOFFMAN,
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991-03-22 · Published · cited 5× · 928 F.2d 646; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 4655
928 F.2d 646 59 USLW 2608 Thomas M. HOFFMAN; Timothy David Ulrich, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.STATE OF MARYLAND; Maryland State Administrative Board ofElection Laws; Margarette E. Crowder; Solomon N. Hoke;Barbara B. Kendall; Peggy Rae Pavlat; James W. Johnson,Jr., as members of the Board; Baltimore City Board ofSupervisors of Elections; Marvin L. Cheatham; LionelMurphy; Carl M. Adair,
District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2015-02-10 · Published · cited 0× · 74 F. Supp. 3d 1026; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16140; 2015 WL 542621
ORDER JOHN T. MAUGHMER, United States Magistrate Judge. On October 17, 2014, plaintiff Fabas Consulting International, Inc. (“Fabas”) instituted the present federal litigation against defendant Jet Midwest, Inc. (“Jet”). According to the COMPLAINT, Fabas, a Florida corporation, is in the business of dealing in new and used commercial aircraft parts for resale and lease to scheduled and regional
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991-03-22 · Published · cited 0× · 928 F.2d 646
WIDENER, Circuit Judge: This case is a constitutional challenge to Maryland’s voter purge statute. The statute requires that registered voters who have not voted in the last five years be removed from the rolls by cancellation of their registration. At the time this action was filed, Thomas Hoffman and Timothy David Ulrich, the appellants, were among those voters to be removed from the rolls because they had not voted in the
Supreme Court of the United States · 1989-06-23 · Published · cited 339× · 106 L. Ed. 2d 76; 109 S. Ct. 2818; 492 U.S. 96; 1989 U.S. LEXIS 3138; 20 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1204; 57 U.S.L.W. 4915; 19 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 514
492 U.S. 96 (1989) HOFFMAN, TRUSTEE v. CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF INCOME MAINTENANCE ET AL. No. 88-412. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 19, 1989 Decided June 23, 1989 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT *98 Martin W. Hoffman, pro se, argued the cause and file
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988-06-15 · Published · cited 1× · 850 F.2d 50
MINER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-appellant Martin W. Hoffman, as trustee for Willington Convalescent Home, Inc. and for Edward Zera in two separate and unrelated Chapter 7 proceedings under the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 101 et seq. (1982 & Supp. IV 1986) (“the Code”), commenced adversarial proceedings in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut (Krechev-sky, J.) against defendants-appel
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026-01-29 · Published · cited 0×
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 20-CV-0318 MORGAN BANKS, et al., APPELLANTS, V. DAVID H. HOFFMAN,
In re Hurvitzpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016-07-20 · Published · cited 2× · 554 B.R. 35; 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 2657; 62 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 241; 2016 WL 3995963
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON THE MOTION OF BLUE-GRACE FRANCHISE, LLC FOR RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC STAY Melvin S. Hoffman, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Before me is the Motion of Blue-Grace Franchise, LLC for Relief from the Automatic Stay [# 15] to enforce certain non-competition and nonsolicitation provisions of a franchise agreement entered into with the debtor, Carl S. Hurvitz. Mr. Hurtvitz opposes the granting of
Carl v. Kurtzpublic domain
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978-04-28 · Published · cited 8× · 386 A.2d 577; 255 Pa. Super. 198; 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2880
255 Pa. Superior Ct. 198 (1978) 386 A.2d 577 Jeffrey E. CARL, a minor, by his parents and natural guardians, John R. Carl and Beryl E. Carl, and John R. Carl and Beryl E. Carl in their own right, and Michael W. Rhode, a minor, by his parent and natural guardian, Patricia K. Rhode and Patricia K. Rhode, in her own right, Appellants, v. Daniel A. KURTZ and Kenneth R. Kurtz, Defendants, and Jeffrey E. Carl, Defendant.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016-10-26 · Published · cited 104× · 840 F.3d 698; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 19318; 2016 WL 6246875
OPINION BYBEE, Circuit Judge: Lead plaintiff Carl, Schwartz filed a putative federal securities class action against Defendants Arena Pharmaceuticals, Jack Lief, Dominic Behan, William Shanahan, and Christen Anderson 1 in connection with public statements made about Arena’s weight-loss drug, lor
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2017-01-13 · Published · cited 0× · 2016 IL App (1st) 151615
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Illinois Official Reports Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this doc
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988-09-29 · Published · cited 6× · 529 N.E.2d 790; 175 Ill. App. 3d 219; 124 Ill. Dec. 809; 1988 Ill. App. LEXIS 1420; 1988 WL 99735
175 Ill. App.3d 219 (1988) 529 N.E.2d 790 DAVID HOFFMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF FIRE AND POLICE COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF NAPERVILLE et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 2-88-0031. Illinois Appellate Court — Second District. Opinion filed September 29, 1988. *220 Keith E. Roberts, Sr., and Robert
District Court, S.D. California · 2008-02-14 · Published · cited 0× · 544 F. Supp. 2d 1121; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11068; 2008 WL 413751
(2008) Carl Edward HOFFMAN, Plaintiff, v. IMPACT CONFECTIONS, INC., a Colorado corporation; and Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. No. 06cv0489 BTM(NLS). United States District Court, S.D. California. February 14, 2008. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ, District Judge. Defendant Impact Confections, Inc. (