Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Carl W Hoffman”
Hoffman v. Americahomekey, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JANE J. BOYLE, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant Katherine Shadle’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (doc. 126), filed on November 12, 2013. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the Motion. I. BACKGROUND This case arises out of an employer’s allegedly fraudulent representations
State v. Carl Hreha (070222)public domain
Justice FERNANDEZ-VINA delivered the opinion of the Court. This case involves an appeal from defendant Carl Hreha’s convictions for second-degree computer theft, contrary to N.J.S.A. 2C:20-25(b), and fourth-degree bias intimidation, contrary to N.J.S.A. 2C:16-1. Defendant asserts that the trial court improperly refused t
Hoffman v. United Statespublic domain
209 F.Supp.2d 1089 (2002) Donald D. HOFFMAN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. C02-5023RJB. United States District Court, W.D. Washington at Tacoma. May 3, 2002. Order Denying Reconsideration May 24, 2002. *1090 Donald D. Hoffman, Forks, Wa. W. Carl Hankla, U.S. Dept. of Justice Tax Di
Banks v. Hoffmanpublic domain
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 20-CV-0318 MORGAN BANKS, et al., APPELLANTS, V. DAVID H. HOFFMAN, et
96 B.R. 46 (1988) In re Carl HOFFMAN, Debtor. Carl HOFFMAN, Plaintiff, v. CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL BANK, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 86-2879, Adv. No. 87-70. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. May 26, 1988. Gary W. Short, Pittsburgh, Pa., for debtor. Terry Despoy, Gieg and Gieg, Altoona, Pa., for Central Pennsylvania Nat. Bank. J
Carl v. Oregon Automobile Insurancepublic domain
918 P.2d 861 (1996) 141 Or. App. 515 Robert W. CARL; Shirley Carl; Guy Carr; First Interstate Bank of Oregon, N.A., as Trustee of the Mildred Carr Trust; Tom Edwards; Dorothy Edwards; Carr Building Corporation, an Oregon corporation; Carr Chevrolet Co., Inc., an Oregon corporation, Appellants, v. OREGON AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY/NORTH PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY; Providence Washington Insurance Company; Safeco Insurance C
Empagran S.A. v. F. Hoffman-LaRoche, Ltd.public domain
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HARRY T. EDWARDS. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON. HARRY T. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge: The action in this case was filed under section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, sections 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15 and 26, the antitrust laws of foreign nations, and international law, on behalf of all fore
Banks v. Hoffmanpublic domain
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 20-CV-0318 MORGAN BANKS, et al., APPELLANTS, V. DAVID H. HOFFMAN,
Hoffman v. State of Marylandpublic domain
928 F.2d 646 59 USLW 2608 Thomas M. HOFFMAN; Timothy David Ulrich, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.STATE OF MARYLAND; Maryland State Administrative Board ofElection Laws; Margarette E. Crowder; Solomon N. Hoke;Barbara B. Kendall; Peggy Rae Pavlat; James W. Johnson,Jr., as members of the Board; Baltimore City Board ofSupervisors of Elections; Marvin L. Cheatham; LionelMurphy; Carl M. Adair,
Fabas Consulting Int'l, Inc. v. Jet Midwest, Inc.public domain
ORDER JOHN T. MAUGHMER, United States Magistrate Judge. On October 17, 2014, plaintiff Fabas Consulting International, Inc. (“Fabas”) instituted the present federal litigation against defendant Jet Midwest, Inc. (“Jet”). According to the COMPLAINT, Fabas, a Florida corporation, is in the business of dealing in new and used commercial aircraft parts for resale and lease to scheduled and regional
Hoffman v. State of Marylandpublic domain
WIDENER, Circuit Judge: This case is a constitutional challenge to Maryland’s voter purge statute. The statute requires that registered voters who have not voted in the last five years be removed from the rolls by cancellation of their registration. At the time this action was filed, Thomas Hoffman and Timothy David Ulrich, the appellants, were among those voters to be removed from the rolls because they had not voted in the
492 U.S. 96 (1989) HOFFMAN, TRUSTEE v. CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF INCOME MAINTENANCE ET AL. No. 88-412. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 19, 1989 Decided June 23, 1989 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT *98 Martin W. Hoffman, pro se, argued the cause and file
MINER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-appellant Martin W. Hoffman, as trustee for Willington Convalescent Home, Inc. and for Edward Zera in two separate and unrelated Chapter 7 proceedings under the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 101 et seq. (1982 & Supp. IV 1986) (“the Code”), commenced adversarial proceedings in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut (Krechev-sky, J.) against defendants-appel
Banks v. Hoffman (Amended Opinion)public domain
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 20-CV-0318 MORGAN BANKS, et al., APPELLANTS, V. DAVID H. HOFFMAN,
In re Hurvitzpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON THE MOTION OF BLUE-GRACE FRANCHISE, LLC FOR RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC STAY Melvin S. Hoffman, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Before me is the Motion of Blue-Grace Franchise, LLC for Relief from the Automatic Stay [# 15] to enforce certain non-competition and nonsolicitation provisions of a franchise agreement entered into with the debtor, Carl S. Hurvitz. Mr. Hurtvitz opposes the granting of
Carl v. Kurtzpublic domain
255 Pa. Superior Ct. 198 (1978) 386 A.2d 577 Jeffrey E. CARL, a minor, by his parents and natural guardians, John R. Carl and Beryl E. Carl, and John R. Carl and Beryl E. Carl in their own right, and Michael W. Rhode, a minor, by his parent and natural guardian, Patricia K. Rhode and Patricia K. Rhode, in her own right, Appellants, v. Daniel A. KURTZ and Kenneth R. Kurtz, Defendants, and Jeffrey E. Carl, Defendant.
Carl Schwartz v. Arena Pharmaceuticals, Inc.public domain
OPINION BYBEE, Circuit Judge: Lead plaintiff Carl, Schwartz filed a putative federal securities class action against Defendants Arena Pharmaceuticals, Jack Lief, Dominic Behan, William Shanahan, and Christen Anderson 1 in connection with public statements made about Arena’s weight-loss drug, lor
Mulvey v. Carl Sandburg High Schoolpublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Illinois Official Reports Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this doc
Hoffman v. Board of Fire & Police Commissionerspublic domain
175 Ill. App.3d 219 (1988) 529 N.E.2d 790 DAVID HOFFMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF FIRE AND POLICE COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF NAPERVILLE et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 2-88-0031. Illinois Appellate Court Second District. Opinion filed September 29, 1988. *220 Keith E. Roberts, Sr., and Robert
Hoffman v. Impact Confections, Inc.public domain
(2008) Carl Edward HOFFMAN, Plaintiff, v. IMPACT CONFECTIONS, INC., a Colorado corporation; and Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. No. 06cv0489 BTM(NLS). United States District Court, S.D. California. February 14, 2008. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ, District Judge. Defendant Impact Confections, Inc. (