Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
8 opinions for “Cargle v. Yates”
hiQ Labs, Inc. v. LinkedIn Corp.public domain
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Docket No. 23 EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge ■ I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff hiQ initiated this action after Defendant Linkedln issued a cease and desist letter and attempted to terminate hiQ’s ability to access otherwise publicly available information on profiles of Linked-ln users. The letter
Dillon v. Seattle Deposition Reporters, LLCpublic domain
Dwyer, J. ¶1 — Washington’s anti-SLAPP1 statute protects persons who engage in “action [s] involving public participation and petition” from having to defend against a claim based on those actions.2 The recording of telephone conversations is not such an action. This is so even when such recording is designed to gather evidence for a lawsuit between private parties. The anti
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON JASON DILLON, an individual, o C/5CD DIVISION ONE Appellant, as*
Littlejohn v. Trammellpublic domain
HOLMES, Circuit Judge. Emmanuel Littlejohn was convicted of two robbery-related charges and a charge of first-degree murder, arising from his role in a 1992 robbery of a Root-N-Scoot convenience store in Oklahoma City. He received extended prison sentences on the robbery charges and a death sentence on the murder charge. After a long procedural journey through the Oklahoma courts, Mr. Littlejohn filed a Pe
Ives v. Boonepublic domain
ORDER This matter is before the court on appellant’s petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc. Upon consideration, the petition for rehearing is denied, but the panel amends its order and judgment filed on May 3, 2004. The petition for rehearing en banc was transmitted to all of the judges of the court who are in regular active service as required by Fed. R.App. P. 35. As no member of the panel a
Harlow v. Statepublic domain
105 P.3d 1049 (2005) 2005 WY 12 James Martin HARLOW, aka Thorvaldr Sigwolf, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Wyoming, Respondent. No. 04-101. Supreme Court of Wyoming. February 4, 2005. *1054 Representing Petitioner: Ken Koski, Public Defender; and Marion Yoder, Senior Assistant Public Defender. Represen
Myers v. Statepublic domain
OPINION LILE, Judge: 1 1 Karl Lee Myers was convicted, by jury, of Murder in the First Degree (21 00.98.1991, § 701.7) in the District Court of Rogers County, Case No. CF-96-283, before the Honorable Dynda Post, District Judge. After the sentencing stage, the jury found the existence of four aggravating cireumstances: the murder was especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel; the Defendant was previously con-vie
Slaughter v. Statepublic domain
950 P.2d 839 (1997) 1997 OK CR 78 Jimmie Ray SLAUGHTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee. No. F-94-1312. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. December 17, 1997. Rehearing Denied February 23, 1998. J.W. Coyle III, Oklahoma City, Patrick A. Williams, Tulsa, for appellant at Trial. Richard Wintory, Wes Lane, As