Cases

Ronald B. Leighton, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Washington Education Association's ("WEA") Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment.1 WEA is a public sector union that, until recently, collected fees from nonunion members in accordance with the Supreme Court's holding in Abood v. Detroit Bd. of Ed. , <

KELLY, Circuit Judge. I. Background In August 2012, Special Agent Jesse Smith with the North Dakota Bureau of Criminal Investigations began investigating computer IP addresses in North Dakota that were suspected of downloading' child pornography. The IP addresses were traced back to Robert Evans. Smith contacted Special Agent Mike. Arel with Homeland Sec

OPINION IKUTA, Circuit Judge: This appeal raises the question whether an individual seeking access to his state mining claims over real property owned by the federal government and third parties can bring an action asserting a right-of-way over such real property. We conclude that Mills’s claims against the federal government are barred by sovereign immu

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JANE J. BOYLE, District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiff Carey’s Motion to Remand (doc. 4). For the reasons stated below, the motion is GRANTED so far as this case is remanded in its entirety to state court and DENIED as to awarding attorney’s fees. The clerk is hereby directed to remand this action to County Court at Law No. 4 of Dallas County, Texas according

602 F.Supp.2d 1132 (2009) J. Christopher CAREY, Plaintiff, v. MARICOPA COUNTY, et al., Defendants. No. cv-05-2500-PHX-ROS. United States District Court, D. Arizona. March 12, 2009. *1134 Cecilia Ann Silver, Erin J. Law, Jason Ira Lichter, Jed Paul Winer, John P. Mastando, III, Michelle Movahed, Payal Kiran Shah, Suzanne Ilene Nov

(2008) CAREY RODRIGUEZ GREENBERG & PAUL, LLP, Plaintiff, v. Helga ARMINAK, Arminak & Associates, Inc., Defendants. Case No. 08-21557-MC. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. October 28, 2008. OMNIBUS ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD, DENYING MOTION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD, HOLDING PLAINTIFF IS ENTITLED

People v Carey (2025 NY Slip Op 01944) People v Carey 2025 NY Slip Op 01944 Decided on April 2, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

STEWART, Chief Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I concur in the panel majority’s conclusion that: 1) Scott failed to provide the required statutory notice and should therefore be dismissed from this case; 2) the Louisiana NAACP has standing only to challenge the in-person transactions; and 3) Schedler has enforcement authority under Section 10 of the NVRA, and

910 F.Supp. 704 (1995) Jack B. YAGER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Ronald CAREY, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. Nos. 93-1054, 93-1970 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 27, 1995. *705 *706 *707 *708

Jean-Charles v Carey (2023 NY Slip Op 03003) Jean-Charles v Carey 2023 NY Slip Op 03003 Decided on June 7, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

163 F.Supp.2d 271 (2001) The INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, Plaintiff, v. Ron CAREY, William Hamilton, Jere Nash, the November Group, Inc., Martin Davis, the Share Group, Inc., Michael Ansara, Barbara Arnold, Citizen Action Management Fund, Ira Arlook, Charles Blitz, Rochelle Davis, Cohen, Weiss and Simon, and Nathaniel Charny, Defendants. No. 00 CIV. 2952(LTS). United States District Court, S

SUPERIOR COURT COMMONWEALTH v s. JOHN CAREY Docket: 2277CR00324 Dates: April 2, 2025 Present: Jeffrey T. Karp

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION JOSÉ A. CABRANES, District Judge: This action seeks damages to redress an alleged deprivation by defendant David J. Carey of plaintiff Gordon Butts’ rights under the Constitution and laws of the United States and the State of Connecticut. Specifically, Butts claims a deprivation of his rights under the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United S

R. L. Tahvonen, J. The people appeal by leave granted from the circuit court’s affirmance of the district court’s dismissal of charges against defendants of fleeing and eluding a police officer or conservation officer when directed to bring a motorcycle to a stop, MCL 257.602a; MSA 9.2302(1), and of operating an unregistered motorcycle on a public street, MCL 257.215; MSA 9.1915. We affirm the dismissal of the charges.

PER CURIAM: The Florida Supreme Court has responded to a question that we certified in Fremont Indemnity Company v. Carey Dwyer Eckhart Mason & Spring, P.A., 197 F.3d 1053 (11th Cir.1999). The facts are more completely recited in that opinion. Fremont Indemnity Company (“Fremont”) filed a legal malpractice action against the attorney-defendants Carey, Dwyer, et al., on February 14, 1997. T

OPINION SUTTON, Circuit Judge. A few days before the deadline for filing a notice of appeal in this case, Scott and Tammy Isert, through their attorney, filed a motion in the district court asking for an extension of time in which “to file any Notice of Appeal.” JA 407. The court denied the motion, and the Iserts do not challenge that ruling. What they d

EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge: This appeal is one by four defendants, formerly executives with General Development Corporation (“GDC”), who were convicted of defrauding and conspiring to defraud home buyers throughout the 1980’s. Their guilt was not proved: insufficient evidence was presented that a scheme reasonably calculated to deceive persons of ordinary prudence and comprehens

WILLIAMS, J. liA Caddo Parish Grand Jury returned an indictment charging the defendant, De-mond Carey, with second degree murder, in violation of LSA-R.S. 14:30.1. Following a jury trial, he was found guilty of the responsive verdict of manslaughter. He was adjudicated a second-felony habitual offender and sentenced to serve 80 years at hard labor without the benefit of probation or suspension of sentence. For the following re

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-10188 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 1:17-cr-00252-LJO-1 AUSTIN LEE CAREY, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

PER CURIAM: CERTIFICATION FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA AND THE HONORABLE JUSTICES THEREOF: It appears to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit that this case presents an important issue of Florida law that