Cases

McKAY, Circuit Judge. Claimant Cardin F. Rutledge appeals from the district court’s affirmance of the decision of the Social Security Administration denying him disability benefits. 1 A *1174 previous denial of benefits was remanded to t

54 F.3d 788NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Cardin F. RUTLEDGE, Plaintiff

OPINION AND ORDER Malcolm F. Marsh, United States District Judge Plaintiff Denis Murray seeks judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-403. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). For the reasons

MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM L. STANDISH, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Angela Lee Dunkle, seeks judicial review of a decision of Defendant, Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”), denying her applications for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and supplemental security income (“SSI”) under Titles II and XVI, respectively, of the Social Security Ac

651 F.Supp.2d 434 (2009) Daniel J. NATALE, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. No. 2:08-cv-476. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. August 21, 2009. *437 Joshua D. Lamancusa, Law Offices of Carmen F. Lamancusa, P.C., New Castle, PA, Plaintiff. Christy Wiegand, United States Attorney's Off

302 F.Supp.2d 382 (2001) Dianna HIPPENSTEEL, Plaintiff, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. CIV.A.3:CV-00-1652. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. September 27, 2001. *383 *384 Patricia A. Shoap, Shoap Law

OPINION OF THE COURT OAKES, Senior Circuit Judge. William Morales appeals the decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Brody, Judge) approving and adopting the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate (Scuderi, M.J.) affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s conclusion

Opinion NORCOTT, J. The dispositive issue in this certified appeal is whether service of process pursuant to General Statutes § 4-183 (c)1 is perfected upon depositing in the mail, certified mail, return receipt requested, a copy of the appeal papers, addressed to the proper agency or the attorney general within forty-five days of the mailing of the agency’s decision. The

Hotten, J. We consider whether a party who challenges the constitutionality and retroactive effect of a newly-enacted Maryland statute must pursue and exhaust administrative remedies *8 before seeking declaratory relief in the circuit court. Petitioners, United Insurance Company of America and the Relia

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO-19) AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR COSTS AND FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (ECF NO. 9) PAUL D. BORMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti’s November 20, 2015 Report and Recommendation regarding Plaintiffs Application for Attorneys’ Fees under the Equal Access to

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

EVELEIGH, J. The plaintiffs, Jefferson Allen and Evita Allen, appeal 1 from the trial court's award of summary judgment upholding the decision of the defendant, the Commissioner of Revenue Services, denying their request for a tax refund for the taxable years 2002, 2006, and 2007. In this appeal, the plaintiff

ADKINS, J. An Administrative Law Judge found that Lauren McClanahan (“Mother”) was responsible for child abuse and could be placed on the “central registry” maintained by the Depart*695ment of Human Resources (“DHR”). This finding was based on Mother taking her child to health providers on multiple occasions after the ch

DEBORAH S. EYLER, J. John T. Mitchell applied to the Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration (“MVA”) for vanity plates bearing the letters MIERDA. The application was granted. Two years later, the MVA received a complaint from a member of the public about Mitchell’s vanity plates. It investigated and determined that “mierda” is the Spa

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o

BARBERA, J. Resolution of this case requires us to construe several provisions of the Transportation Article of the Maryland Code (1977, 2009 RepLVol.) (hereafter “TR”). The first of those is TR § 16-117.1, which provides in relevant part that, upon satisfaction of certain requirements, a licensee may “appl[y] for the expungement of the licensee’s public driving record.” We must d

RICK D. FELLER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RespondentFeller v. Comm'rDocket No. 4325-07United States Tax Court

523 F.3d 957 (2008) Lanny L. CHRISTENSEN, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER of INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. No. 06-71881. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted November 9, 2007. Filed April 21, 2008. *958 James G. LeBloch (briefed and argued), Newport Beach, CA, for the petitioner.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 7, 2008 Session STEVEN WATERS ET AL. v. REAGAN FARR, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE FOR THE STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals, Eastern Section Chancery Court for Loudon County No. 10710 Frank V. Williams, III, Chancellor

RHIANNON G. O'DONNABHAIN, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RespondentO'Donnabhain v. Comm'rNo. 6402-06United States Tax Court