Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Carbin v. First Card”
United States v. Louis Carbins, Jr.public domain
W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge: Following a jury trial, Louis W. Carbins, Jr., was convicted of one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 , seven counts of aiding and abetting theft of Government money in violation o
Lawrence Iseral Hubert v. the State of Texaspublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-21-00168-CR NO. 09-21-00169-CR NO. 09-21-00170-CR __________________ LAWRENCE ISERAL HUBERT, Appellant
Naylor v. ROTECH HEALTHCARE, INC.public domain
679 F.Supp.2d 505 (2009) Scott B. NAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. ROTECH HEALTHCARE, INC., Defendant. File No. 1:08-CV-95. United States District Court, D. Vermont. December 23, 2009. *507 Kaveh S. Shahi, Cleary Shahi & Aicher, P.C., Rutland, VT, for Plaintiff. Andrew H. Maass, Ryan Smith & Carbine, Ltd., Rutland, VT, for De
United States v. Israel Martinezpublic domain
CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge: After a months-long investigation into hiring practices at Waste Management Incorporated ("WMI"), the Government charged Defendant-Appellant Israel Arguimides Martinez and several co-defendants with various immigration crimes stemming from their participation in efforts to recruit and retain undocumented immigrants for employment at WMI in Houston, Texas. M
United States v. Antonio Westpublic domain
SYKES, Circuit Judge. Antonio West was indicted for possessing a firearm as a felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The gun in question— an old Ml carbine — apparently belonged to his late father and was found in the attic of the family home during a consensual search for a stolen television. No fingerprints were recovered from the gun, and there was conflicting evidence
GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. Orcuttpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER AFFIRMING IN PART AND REVERSING IN PART BANKRUPTCY COURT’S APRIL 2, 2013 ADVERSARY PROCEEDING ORDER AND BANKRUPTCY COURT’S APRIL 2, 2013 PLAN AND HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION ORDER (No. 13-82, Doc. 1; No. 13-83, Doc. 1) CHRISTINA REISS, Chief Judge. This matter comes before the court on the appeals filed by GMAC Mortgage, LLC (“GMAC”) from two Orders of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Dis
Origin Bank v. JPS Aero, L.L.C., JPS Aviation, L.L.C., K. Paul Bullock, and Margaret L. Bullockpublic domain
Judgment rendered April 10, 2024. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 55,557-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** ORIGIN BANK
State v. Hummelpublic domain
JUSTICE TIMPONE delivered the opinion of the Court. **200This case is before us on the narrow issue of the legality of the police's search and seizure of the contents of defendant Lori Hummel's handbag while she was detained at the Gloucester County Prosecutor's Office. We find no valid inventory search. We therefore affirm the Appellate Divisi
State v. Stuckmanpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Stuckman, 2018-Ohio-4050.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SANDUSKY COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals Nos. S-17-039 S-17-040 Appellee Trial Court Nos. 17CR236 v.
People v. Duniganpublic domain
RONAYNE KRAUSE, J. Defendant appeals as of right his jury trial conviction of second-degree home invasion, MCL 750.110a(3). He was sentenced to 5 to 40 years’ imprisonment. We affirm. Second-degree home invasion requires proof that the defendant entered a dwelling by breaking or without the permission of any person in ownership or lawful possession or control of the dwelling and did so with the intent to commit
United States v. Burdenpublic domain
OPINION ON JOINT MOTION FOR A JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL Rosemary M. Collyer, United States District Judge Defendants Pheerayuth Burden and Wing-On LLC moved at the close of the government’s case in their criminal trial and at the close of all evidence for judgment of acquittal. The Court heard arguments and denied both motions in open court. This Opinion explains those rulings. I. BACKGROU
United States v. Yindeear-Rompublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) ) ) v. ) Criminal Action No. 14-cr-0069 (RMC) ) PHEERAYUTH BURDEN, )
Hallmark v. Cohen & Slamowitz, LLPpublic domain
ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Michael Hallmark ("Plaintiff") commenced this action, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, on October 6, 2011, alleging that Cohen & Slamowitz. LLP and Midland Funding LLC d/b/a Midland Funding of Delaware, LLC (collectively, "Defendants") sought to collect a debt from Plaintiff and others in violat
MANION, Circuit Judge. The St. Paul Travelers Companies, Inc. (“St. Paul”) filed a declaratory judgment action seeking a determination of its obligation, if any, to cover the claims of a Corn Island Shipyard, Inc. (“Corn Island”) employee under an insurance policy St. Paul had issued to Corn Island. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of St. Paul concluding that b
People of Michigan v. Joshun Edwardspublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra
People of Michigan v. Joshun Edwardspublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra
Sinnissippi Rod & Gun Club, Inc. v. Raoulpublic domain
2024 IL App (3d) 210073 Opinion filed March 1, 2024 ____________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT 2024 SINNISSIPPI ROD & GUN CLUB, INC
United States v. Jason Procknowpublic domain
TINDER, Circuit Judge. DefendanWAppellant Jason Procknow pleaded guilty to one count of theft of government money, 18 U.S.C. § 641, and one count of aggravated identify theft, id. § 1028(a)(1), related to his filing of fraudulent tax returns claiming refunds. Procknow appeals the denial of his motion to suppress, having reserved the right to do so in his plea a
People of Michigan v. Jeremiah Dejuan Abcumby-Blairpublic domain
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, FOR PUBLICATION December 22, 2020 Plaintiff-Appellee,
State v. Washingtonpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Washington, 2022-Ohio-1426.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MIAMI COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-Appellee : Appellate Case No. 2020-CA-18 : v.