Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Candace Marie Miller”
Candace Eidson v. SC Dept. of Educationpublic domain
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Candace Eidson, on behalf of herself and her minor child; Coneitra Miller, on behalf of herself and her minor child; Joy Brown, on behalf of herself and her minor children; Crystal Rouse, on behalf of herself and her minor children; Amanda McDougald Scott, on behalf of herself and her minor child; Penny Hanna, on behalf of herself and her minor children; the South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP; and The South Carolina
in Re Kenneth Vern Gibbs and Candace Gibbs Waltonpublic domain
management of his finances. Albert created GWB Trust into which any interest he may have held in the Estate could be funneled. He then created Renhaw, Inc., and Pentex FILED IN Royalty Trust, 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS int
in Re Kenneth Vern Gibbs and Candace Gibbs Waltonpublic domain
ACCEPTED 06-15-00002-CV SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 06-15-00002-CV
Miller v. Campbell Countypublic domain
THOMAS, Justice. The question presented in this appeal is novel to Wyoming, and it is substantially unique in American jurisprudence. Can the collateral source rule be invoked in favor of plaintiffs who are seeking compensation for inverse condemnation? The appellants in this case (homeowners) were ordered to evacuate their residences in a subdivision of Gillette known as Rawhide Village Subdivision. The reason for the eva
Miller v. Rice Drilling D L.L.C.public domain
[Cite as Miller v. Rice Drilling D L.L.C., 2023-Ohio-3588.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT BELMONT COUNTY SHAWN MILLER et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RICE DRILLING D LLC et al.,
Candace J. Wilson v. Wayne Zoellnerpublic domain
MAGILL, Circuit Judge. After unsuccessfully bringing suit against The Prudential Insurance Company (Prudential) to recover medical expenses under an insurance policy, see Wilson v. Prudential Ins. Co., 97 F.3d 1010 (8th Cir.1996), Candace J. Wilson brought this action in Missouri state court against Wayne J. Zoellner for Zoellner’s alleged negligent misrepresen
Candace J. Wilson v. Wayne Zoellnerpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 96-3170 ___________ Candace J. Wilson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCMF-XX-XXXXXXX 22-SEP-2025 02:29 PM
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT BEVERLEY C.B. WHITE; JOHN DORSO and SUE DORSO; COLLETTE MERCIER, as Attorney-in-fact for JOSEPH MERCIER; MARK SCHERER, as personal representative of the Estate of Sandra Spaugh; LOGAN CHAMBERLAIN and SUSAN CHAMBERLAIN; JOHN JANSEN; JAMES DOWDELL, JR.; JONI SHERRILL, as executor of the Estate of Sam Tedesco; JOHN FILAK, as trustee under John Filak Revocable Trust Agreement dated May 3
Miller v. Campbell Countypublic domain
901 P.2d 1107 (1995) H. Douglas MILLER and Danene R. Miller, individually and as conservator(s) of Laura K. Miller, Lindy L. Miller and Clint T. Miller, minors; Steve Adams and Peggy Adams, individually and as conservator(s) of Christie Adams and Jamie Adams, minors; Scott G. Anderson and Tobey J. Anderson, individually and as conservator(s) of Michael Todd Anderson, Chanel S. Anderson, and Tobin P. Anderson, minors; Paul D. Bailey, Jr.; Roxanne G. Randa
Field v. Michiganpublic domain
255 F.Supp.2d 708 (2003) Donald G. FIELD, Carl L. Altman, Leonard T. Zolnierkek, James D. Peltier, Stephen R. Weichel, Kevin Boyat, Sr., and Richard E. Hermanson, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated persons, County of Alcona, County of Presque Isle, County of Alpena, and County of Montmorency, Plaintiffs, v. State of MICHIGAN and Candace Miller, in Her Official Capacity as Secretary of State for the State of Michigan, Defendants.
BRIGGEMAN v. HARGROVEpublic domain
ROBERT D. BELL, Judge. {1 In this post-paternity, custody modification proceeding, Defendant/Appellant, Candace L. Hargrove (Mother), appeals from the trial court's order dated February 29, 2012, which found the trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider Mother's application for attorneys fees and costs. The trial court held the Oklahoma Supreme Court's order entered in Case No
Graves Ex Rel. Graves v. Stonepublic domain
191 F.Supp.2d 1194 (2002) Sean GRAVES, a minor, by his parents, Randal GRAVES and Natalie Graves, Plaintiffs, v. Jefferson County Sheriff John C. STONE, individually and in his official capacity, Former Jefferson County Sheriff Ronald Beckham, individually and in his official capacity, Jefferson County Sheriff's Department, Neil Gardner, individually, John Hicks, individually, Mark M. Miller, individually, T. Williams, individually, Mike Guerra,
State v. Sheadpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Shead, 2023-Ohio-3838.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2023-P-0002 Plaintiff-Appellee, Criminal Appeal from the - vs - Court of Common Pleas JULIANNE M. SHEAD,
Kirklin v. Stonepublic domain
191 F.Supp.2d 1198 (2002) Mike KIRKLIN and Lance Kirklin, Plaintiffs, v. Jefferson County Sheriff John C. STONE, individually and in his official capacity, Former Jefferson County Sheriff Ronald Beckham, individually and in his official capacity, Jefferson County Sheriff's Department, Neil Gardner, individually, John Hicks, individually, Mark M. Miller, individually, T. Williams, individually, Mike Guerra, individually, Phillip Lebeda, individual
Kagan v. City of New Orleanspublic domain
ORDER AND REASONS SUSIE MORGAN, District Judge. Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment filed by plaintiffs Can-dance Kagan, Mary LaCoste, Joycelyn Cole, and Annette Watt (together, “Plaintiffs”), and defendant City of New Orleans (the “City”).1 For the following reasons, the City’s motion is GRANTED and Plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED. BACKGROUND
Grueff v. Vitopublic domain
Deborah S. Eyler, J. In this appeal, we hold that a broadly worded power to amend in an irrevocable trust instrument cannot be used by a majority of beneficiaries to divest a minority beneficiary of her interest in the trust when doing so would be contrary to the settlor’s intent in creating the trust. We also hold that, under Maryla
Mountain West Bank, N.A. v. Cherrad, LLCpublic domain
JUSTICE WHEAT delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 The Estate of Craig Kinnaman (the Estate) appeals from an order of the First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County, granting summary judgment to Cherrad, LLC (Cherrad), Merritt & Marie, LLC (Merritt & Marie), Max & V, LLC (Max & V),
Gonzalez v. Arizonapublic domain
649 F.3d 953 (2011) Maria M. GONZALEZ; Luciano Valencia; the Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc.; Arizona Advocacy Network; Steve M. Gallardo; League of United Latin American Citizens Arizona; League of Women Voters of Arizona; People for the American Way Foundation; Hopi Tribe, Plaintiffs, and Bernie Abeytia; Arizona Hispanic Community Forum; Chicanos Por La Causa; Friendly House; Jesus Gonzalez; Debbie Lopez; Southwest Voter Registration Educatio
BRIGGEMAN v. HARGROVEpublic domain
OSCN Found Document:BRIGGEMAN v. HARGROVE OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets Legal Research Calendar Help