Cases

461 S.W.2d 53 (1970) Ralph CANADY, Steve Parker and William Garvin Allen Alias William Garrin Allen, II, Plaintiffs in Error, v. STATE of Tennessee, Defendant in Error. Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee. February 3, 1970. Certiorari Denied November 2, 1970. *55 Eugene D. Smith, Cincinnati, Ohio, Robert E. Lillard and David V

After stating the case: The defendants contended that, by their answer, they had raised an issue as to whether the fifth tract of land had been omitted from the description in the deed by the mutual mistake of the parties, and also as to whether that tract was included by the description of the lands in the option. It was not described separately by its name, but was a part of the lands answering to the general description in the deed. So that the issue raised by the answer was waived or rend

The complaint, after alleging the execution of a note for $5,500 by defendant D. D. Suttle to the defendant, J. B. Bostic, secured by deed of trust, its assignment for value to the plaintiff, and its nonpayment, further set out: 3. That on 6 February, 1892, the defendant J. M. Ray contracted in writing with the defendant J. B. Bostic, for a valuable consideration, to pay the said note to the plaintiff, and to protect and save the defendants Bostic and Suttle from any and all liability

CANADY, J., concurring. I concur with the decision to approve the result reached by the First District, and to disapprove the decision of the Fifth District in Bostic v. State, 902 So.2d 225 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). I also agree with receding from the holding of Williams v. State, 492 So.2d 1051, 1054 (Fla.1986), that the “literal requirement” of “the antique ‘or replica’ exceptions” to section 7

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0129p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-Appellee, │

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC14-1856 ____________ STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. CHRISTOPHER DOUGLAS WEEKS, Respondent. [September 22, 2016] CO

[Cite as Poe v. Univ. of Cincinnati, 2013-Ohio-5451.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Sharon L. Poe, Admr., etc., : Plaintiff-Appellant, : v. : No. 12AP-929 (Ct. of Cl. No. 2010-11340) University of Cincinnati,

PER CURIAM: After the petitioners, Multiplex, Inc., Art R. Poff and Pamela A. Poff, voluntarily dismissed their suit for injunctive relief, the Circuit Court of Clay County, West Virginia, ordered that the petitioners’ $25,000.00 injunction bond be forfeited and paid over to the respondent, Town of Clay, to compensate respondent for its attorney fees and costs. On appeal, the peti

498 F.3d 336 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth Roy THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-1290. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: July 18, 2007. Decided and Filed: August 10, 2007. *337 ARGUED: Gary W. Crim, Dayton, Ohio, for Appellant. Julie Ann Woods, Assistant Un

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 07a0308p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellee, -

MOORE, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which DAUGHTREY, J., joined. BATCHELDER, J. (p. 478), delivered a separate concurring opinion. OPINION KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant James Edward Gapinski (“Gapinski”) pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to manufacture more than 100 marijuana plants, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), and 84 l(b)(l)(

BENJAMIN, Chief Justice: The petitioner, Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc. (“Vanderbilt”), appeals both the August 15, 2011, Order Awarding Civil Penalties (“civil penalties order”)(Case Number 11-1288) and the October 18, 2011, Final Order Awarding Attorney Fees and Costs (“attorney fees order”) (Case Number 11-1604) of the Circuit Court of Harrison County. Vanderbilt argue

618 F.3d 577 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert WETTSTAIN (No. 08-5707) and John Edward Stewart (No. 08-5708), Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 08-5707, 08-5708. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: June 10, 2010. Decided and Filed: August 30, 2010. *581 ARGUED: Shawn P. H

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 09a0131p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellee, - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

507 S.E.2d 56 (1998) FIRST ATLANTIC MANAGEMENT, CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. DUNLEA REALTY, CO., H. Steven Harris, and Jeffrey L. Dunlea, Defendants. No. COA97-540. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. November 3, 1998. *58 Ward and Smith, P.A. by Shelli Stoker Stillerman and John M. Martin, Greenville, for plaintiff-appellant.

86 S.E.2d 441 (1955) 241 N.C. 744 Bynum COFFEY, Carrie E. Coffey and Virginia C. Burgess v. Tom GREER, Mary Ann Greer, and R. T. Greer, Guardian ad litem of Tom Greer and Mary Ann Greer. No. 309. Supreme Court of North Carolina. March 30, 1955. *442 Bowie & Bowie, West Jefferson, Wade E. Brown, Boone,

74 S.E.2d 630 (1953) 237 N.C. 244 GOODWIN v. GREENE et al. No. 23. Supreme Court of North Carolina. February 25, 1953. *632 John F. White, Edenton, and LeRoy & Goodwin, Elizabeth City, for defendants-appellants. Weldon A. Hollowell, Edenton, and Pritchett & Cooke, Windsor, attorneys for plai

On 12 April, 1907, the defendants executed for a nominal consideration a contract, in writing, commonly called an option, whereby the defendants bound themselves to sell for a fixed price and for a definite period the timber growing and to be grown on certain lands described therein. Within the time required by the option the plaintiff gave due notice to defendant of its intention to purchase the timber and of its readiness to comply in all respects with the terms of purchase, thereby convert

This is an action to recover money, and is based upon the (589) following facts: The Forest Hill Realty Company conveyed to S. M. Hanie a lot in the city of Charlotte, and S. M. Hanie gave to Forest Hill Realty Company his notes for the purchase money of said lot and secured the same by deed of trust to James L. DeLaney. The Forest Hill Realty Company assigned said notes to J. J. Harrill, who, in turn, transferred the same to the plaintiff. S. M. Hanie executed a second deed of