Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Campos v. Eighteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Illinois”
Campos v. Federal Communications Commissionpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ASPEN, District Judge. The named plaintiffs in this action are aliens who have been admitted into the *866United States for permanent residence. All of these plaintiffs have sought employment in the private sector which, by Federal Communication Commission (FCC) regulation, requires them to obtain various commercial radio
Reynolds ex rel. Albizu Campos v. Delgadopublic domain
Mr. Chief Justice Negrón Fernández delivered the opinion of the Court. On September 30, 1953, the Governor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico granted to Pedro Albizu Campos— who had been convicted and sentenced for the commission of several offenses against the laws of Puerto Rico — a conditional pardon conceived in the following terms: “To whom it may concern:
State of Iowa v. Scottize Danyelle Brownpublic domain
APPEL, Justice (dissenting). Under article I, section 8 of the Iowa Constitution, can a police officer use a common minor traffic violation as an after-the-fact pretext to seize a vehicle and its passengers when the actual reason for the stop was constitutionally inadequate? Today's majority says yes. I say NO! I. Summary. History demonstrates that one of the fundamental purpos
State of Iowa v. Scottize Danyelle Brownpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 17–0367 Filed June 28, 2019 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. SCOTTIZE DANYELLE BROWN, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, Nathan A. Callahan, District Associate Judge. The defendant challenges her conviction for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated under Iowa Code section 321J.2 (2017), arguing she was subjected to an
ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM
13-3123; 13-3088 In re Reassignment of Cases: Ligon; Floyd et al. v. City of New York, et al. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 13th day of November, two
Miller v. Prudential Insurance Co. of Americapublic domain
625 F.Supp.2d 1256 (2008) Grace MILLER, plaintiff, v. The PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, defendant. No. 07-60882-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. October 9, 2008. *1257 Joseph Sassoon Kashi, Sperry, Shapiro & Kashi, Plantation, FL, for Plaintiff. Anthony Peter Strasius, Wilson, Elser, Moskowit
In re Marriage of Gamblapublic domain
No. 2--05--0971 filed: 7/31/06 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________ ________ In re MARRIAGE OF ) Appeal from the Circuit Court CHRISTOPHER M. GAMBLA, )
January 5, 2017 CHARLES N. DRAPER, § § Appellant, Pro Se § CAUSE NO. 03-16-00745-CV § V. § IN THE THIRD COURT § OF APPEALS GREG GUERNSEY, § IN HIS CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF § at Aus
In Re Marriage of Gambla and Woodsonpublic domain
853 N.E.2d 847 (2006) In re MARRIAGE OF Christopher M. GAMBLA, Petitioner-Appellant, and Kimberly K. WOODSON, Respondent-Appellee. No. 2-05-0971. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. July 31, 2006. *849 Christopher M. Gambla, West Chicago, pro se. Lyle B. Haskin, Barbara A. Corrigan, Henry D. Kass, Haskin & Corrig
ACCEPTED 04-15-00097-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 12/29/2015 8:55:56 PM KEITH HOTTLE
Barnett v. City of Chicagopublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION BRIAN BARNETT DUFF, District Judge. INTRODUCTION A. The Trial Proceedings 1. The trial of this case lasted for 48 trial days commencing on February 28, 1996 and concluding on August 1, 1996.1 There was a lengthy hiatus in the trial between April 4, 1996 and June 25, 1996 necessitated by a serious injury suffer
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: Over the past fifty years, the steady march of civil rights has been to New Orleans and this court. It continues but the demands have changed. Relatively clear lines of legality and morality have become more difficult to locate as demands for outcomes have followed the cutting away of obstacles to full participation. With our diverse ethnic makeup, this demand for results in voting has
999 F.2d 831 62 USLW 2175, 26 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1379 LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, COUNCIL NO. 4434,Plaintiffs-Appellees,andJesse Oliver, et al., Intervening Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.William P. CLEMENTS, Etc., et al., Defendants.Jim MATTOX, et al., Defendants-Appellees-Appellants,v.Judge F. Harold ENTZ, Etc., Judge Sharolyn Wood, Etc., andGeorge S. Bayoud, Jr., Etc., Defendants-
La Jueza Asociada Señora Pabón Charneco emitió la opinión del Tribunal. Hoy este Tribunal está llamado a expresarse en cuanto a la constitucionalidad de dos piezas legislativas que dis-ponen celebrar un referéndum el 19 de agosto de 2012. En este se propone al Pueblo enmendar las Sees. 2, 3, 4, y 7 del *5Art. Ill de la Constitución de Puerto Rico, L.P.R.A.,
ORDER LONGSTAFF, Chief Judge. THE COURT HAS BEFORE IT the following motions: 1) plaintiffs’ motion to certify class, filed October 7, 2004; 2) plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss the intervenors, filed October 7, 2004; 3) plaintiffs’ motion to amend the amended complaint, filed October 12, 2004; and 4) plaintiffs’ motion to amend/correct the class description, filed August 18, 2005. Defendants have resisted all mo
Jean v. US Bank National Associationpublic domain
(2008) JEAN AND MILDRED ANTOINE, Plaintiffs, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al., Defendants. Civil Action No.: 07-1518 (RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 22, 2008. RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge. MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING THE PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT; GRANTINGDEFENDANT'SMOTION TO DISMISS FRAUD CL
East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Joseph Bidenpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT; Nos. 18-17274 AL OTRO LADO; INNOVATION LAW 18-17436 LAB; CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 4:18-cv-06810- JST v. JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the ORDER AND United States; MERRICK B. AME
East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Joseph Bidenpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT; Nos. 18-17274 AL OTRO LADO; INNOVATION LAW 18-17436 LAB; CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 4:18-cv-06810- JST v. JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the ORDER AND United States; MERRICK B. AME
Gabriel Buele Morocho v. Warden Philadelphia FDCpublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ Nos. 26-1150 and 26-1454 ______________ GABRIEL ANTONIO BUELE MOROCHO v. WARDEN PHILADELPHIA FDC; ACTING DIRECTOR PHILADELPHIA FIELD OFFICE IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT; SECRETARY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; ATTORNEY