Cases

Justice ALITO, concurring in part and dissenting in part. *2596It is a sign of our time that the inclusion of a question about citizenship on the census has become a subject of bitter public controversy and has led to today's regrettable decision. While the decision to place such a question on the 2020 ce

18-2454-cv (L) People of the State of New York v. Griepp 1 2 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 3 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 4 ____________________ 5 6 August Term, 2019 7 8 (Argued: September 26, 2019 Decided: March 10, 2021) 9 10 Docket Nos. 18-2454-cv, 18-2623-cv, 18-2627-cv, 18-2630-cv 11 12 13

USCA11 Case: 22-11359 Document: 52-1 Date Filed: 07/12/2024 Page: 1 of 24 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-11359 ____________________ CHARLES JOHNSON, JR.,

OPINION AND ORDER ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., United States District Judge. Plaintiffs Kathleen Makinen and Jamie Nardini sued the City of New York, former Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly, and Sergeant Daniel Sweeney, claiming that they had been discriminated against based on a perceived disability in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the New York State Human Rights Law (“NYSHRL”), and the Ne

OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: Robert Bertuglia, Jr. (“Bertuglia”), and Laro Maintenance Corporation, Laro Maintenance, and Laro Service Systems (together “Laro”) bring this action against *615the following defendants: (1) three Port Authority of New York and New Jersey employees — Jeffrey Schaffler, Fred Fer-rone, and

Opinion SWEET, District Judge. [[Image here]] *474[[Image here]] Plaintiff Adrian Schoolcraft (“School-craft” or “Plaintiff’); Defendants Christopher Broschart, Timothy Caughey, Kurt Duncan, Elise Hanlon, Theodore Lauter-born, Michael Marino, Gerald Nelson, Frederick Sawyer, The City Of New York, Timothy

OPINION AND ORDER LORETTA A. PRESEA, Chief Judge. Plaintiffs brought this collective action seeking back wages for overtime pay they claim Defendants the City of New York (the “City”) and the New York City Fire Department (the “FDNY”) withheld from them and other similarly situated individuals in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (the “FLSA”). D

OPINION & ORDER HAROLD BAER, JR., District Judge. The City of New York and Guadalupe Sarracino (“Sarracino”) (collectively “Defendants”) move to dismiss several claims in the Complaint charging violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and New York state law for injuries arising out of a police search of Plaintiff George Gannon (“Plaintiff”)’s apartment. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ moti

FILED 14-0265 2/4/2015 11:52:10 PM tex-4028401 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CANNELLA, District Judge. Plaintiff’s motion for relief from final judgment under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is denied. Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). Defendants’ motions for reasonable attorney’s fees and/or costs is denied. Fed.R.Civ.P. 11. BACKGROUND On January 11, 1990, the Court granted defendants’ motions to dismiss plaintiff’s com

Smith v State of New York (2022 NY Slip Op 00344) Smith v State of New York 2022 NY Slip Op 00344 Decided on January 20, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuan

Smith v State of New York (2022 NY Slip Op 00344) Smith v State of New York 2022 NY Slip Op 00344 Decided on January 20, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuan

State of New York OPINION Court of Appeals This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 83 Roxanne Delgado, et al., Appellants, v. State of New York et al., Respondents. Cameron J. Macdonald, for appellants. Victor Paladino, for respondents. Carl E. H

CHIN, District Judge. In this case, plaintiff-appellant Anthony P. Capobianco, Jr. was employed as a New York City sanitation worker. He suffers from “congenital stationary night blindness,” which prevents him from driving at night and makes it difficult for him to see and function in dim light. The New York City Department of Sanitation (“DOS”) fired him, at least in part, as a jur

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT E. PAYNE, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on DEFENDANT TODD BEYINGTON’S RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. (Docket No. 180). For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be granted. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On July 14, 2010, officers of the Richmond Police Department (“RPD”) arrived at a private residence l

OPINION AND ORDER DENISE COTE, District Judge: This dispute arises out of the determination by the New York Police Department (“NYPD”) that plaintiff Jonathan Pesce (“Pesce”) is medically disqualified from serving as a police officer on account of having a seizure condition and taking anti-convulsant medication. Pesce has sued the NYPD, the City of New York, NYPD surgeon Dr. Eli Kleinman, and for

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT E. PAYNE, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on DEFENDANT WESLEY E. MOORE’S RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 178). For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be granted. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On July 14, 2010, officers of the Richmond Police Department (“RPD”) arrived at a private residen

19-3591, 19-3595 New York v. United States Department of Homeland Security, Make the Road New York v. Cuccinelli UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2019 Argued: March 2, 2020 Decided: August 4, 2020 Docket Nos. 19-3591, 19-3595 STATE OF N

20-2537 New York v. DHS UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ___________________ August Term, 2020 (Submitted: August 19, 2020 Decided September 11, 2020) Docket No. 20-2537 ___________________ STATE OF NEW YORK, CITY OF NEW YORK, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, ST

REENA RAGGI, Circuit Judge, with whom Chief Judge JACOBS, Judge CABRANES, Judge WESLEY, and Judge LIVINGSTON join, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc: In 1998, after a five-day trial in New York State Family Court, Sonny Souther-land was found to have abused his seven children so severely — sexually and corpo-rally — as to warrant denying him custody for seven years. This