Cases

FARRIS, Circuit Judge. Petitioner challenges the Federal Railroad Administration’s decision that he was properly denied certification as a locomotive engineer by his employer-railroad. *1031 The FRA Administrator upheld a prior administrative decision that concluded that there was no authority un

MEMORANDUM ** The City of Alhambra appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Mineta that a 1998 Record of Decision (“ROD”) for the710 Freeway Project promulgated by the Federal Highway Administration was a final agency decision within the meaning of the Administrative Procedure Act. An Environmental Reevaluation for the project issued on December 17, 2003 by the Federal Highway Admin

432 F.3d 1029 Robert E. CARPENTER, Petitioner,v.Norman Y. MINETA, Secretary of Transportation; Joseph H. Boardman,* Federal Railroad Administrator; Federal Railroad Administration; Department of Transportation, Respondents. No. 04-71221. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted November 15,

MEMORANDUM ** Nicholas S. Roy, a Washington State prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials retaliated against him for filing public disclosure lawsuits. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Whitman v. Mineta, 541 F.3d 929, 931 (9th Cir.2008), and we affirm.

MEMORANDUM ** Nicholas S. Roy, a Washington State prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials retaliated against him for filing public disclosure lawsuits. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Whitman v. Mineta, 541 F.3d 929, 931 (9th Cir.2008), and we affirm.

MEMORANDUM ** Superpoweraffiliates.com, Inc. (SPA) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in its action asserting breach of contract and bad faith against Transportation Insurance Company. We have jurisdiction pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 1291, review the grant of summary judgment de novo, Whitman v. Mineta, 541 F.3d 929, 931 (9th Cir.2008), and affirm. SPA argues that

MEMORANDUM ** Superpoweraffiliates.com, Inc. (SPA) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in its action asserting breach of contract and bad faith against Transportation Insurance Company. We have jurisdiction pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 1291, review the grant of summary judgment de novo, Whitman v. Mineta, 541 F.3d 929, 931 (9th Cir.2008), and affirm. SPA argues that

MEMORANDUM *** Sentry Insurance appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of U.S. Reports, dismissal of the remaining claim, and entry of costs. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, review the grant of summary judgment de novo, Whitman v. Mineta, 541 F.3d 929, 931 (9th Cir.2008), and affirm. Sentry argues that it presented sufficient evidence

MEMORANDUM *** Sentry Insurance appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of U.S. Reports, dismissal of the remaining claim, and entry of costs. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, review the grant of summary judgment de novo, Whitman v. Mineta, 541 F.3d 929, 931 (9th Cir.2008), and affirm. Sentry argues that it presented sufficient evidence

Case: 22-30490 Document: 00516860566 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/16/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED

MEMORANDUM*** LeRoy De Haven, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment and judgment on the pleadings in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against former California Governor, Gray Davis after he was denied parole for the third time in May 1997. De Haven brought several claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, challenging the Governor’s alleged “no parole policy” for inmates convicted

Kimberly Mueller, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The court has issued an order granting defendants' motion for clarification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a). ECF No. 181. The court explained it would issue the instant amended order granting in part and denying in part defendants' motion for summary judgment. Id.; see ECF No. 170 (Dec. 12, 2017 MSJ Order). The order is amended as reflected at page 24:18-26 and page

ORDER JAMES E. GRITZNER, Chief Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Defendants Charles Palmer, Richard Shults, Deborah Hanus, Ilona Avery, Dr. Joan Gerbo, Revae Gabriel, and Deb Wilkens. Plaintiff Jessica Turner resists. A hearing on the Motion was held on January 15, 2015. Plaintiff was represented by attorney Matthew Sease. Defendants were represen

Amit P. Mehta, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Jean-Gabriel Bernier, a federal prisoner, brought this action against the Federal Defendants1 alleging, among other things, that the Federal Bureau of Prisons violated his Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment by refusing to prescribe him the drug Harvoni to treat his Hep

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) JEAN-GABRIEL BERNIER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 16-cv-00828 (APM)

MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge The plaintiff, Yasir Afifi, brings suit against Loretta Lynch, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, James Comey, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (collectively, the “official capacity defendants”),

ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge. On August 22, 2014, the court heard argument on the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants County of Sacramento, City of Rancho Cordova, Officer Sean Barry, and Officer Manuel Kon-stantinidis (collectively defendants), as well as plaintiffs motion to modify the scheduling order. Robert Chalfant appeared for defendants; Manolo Olaso appeared for plaint

MEMORANDUM OPINION RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge Granting Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment; Denying Plaintiff’s Motion to test sufficiency of ANSWER I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Mr. Lawrence U. Davidson, III, pro se,

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge Plaintiff Carlos Loumiet filed suit against the United States Government for *81 the actions of its agency, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”), under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”

637 F.3d 1013 (2011) Allan GERHART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LAKE COUNTY, MONTANA; Lake County Commissioners Mike Hutchin, Paddy Trusler, and Chuck Whitson, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants-Appellees. No. 10-35183. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted December 10, 2010. Filed March 18, 2011.