Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
17 opinions for “California-Nevada Annual Conference of the Methodist Church v. City and County of San Francisco”
Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, United States District Court Now before the Court is the motion of the City and County of San Francisco (“the City”) to dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) of Plaintiff California-Nevada Annual Conference of the Methodist Church (“the Conference”), in which the Conference alleges the following three
California-Nevada Annual Conference of United Methodist Church v. City & County of San Franciscopublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1561 OPINION The City and County of San Francisco (the city) appeals from a writ of mandate ordering it to set aside a resolution of its board of supervisors (the board) initiating the process of designating The First St. John's United Methodist Church as a landmark pursuant to article 10 of the
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Rector Church Wardens and : Vestrymen of Trinity Church : in Oxford Township Philadelphia : County, : Appellant : : v. : No. 1338 C.D. 2018 : Argued: June 3, 2019 City of Philadelphia Historical : Commission and City of Philadelphia : BEFORE: HONORABLE M
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Illinois Official Reports Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 5431694 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 752 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 753 OPINION This case brings to light a variation on a local church's effort to disaffiliate from a national
ACCEPTED 03-15-00528-CV 7458584 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Or Khaim Hashalom v. City of Santa Monicapublic domain
Opinion ALDRICH, J. INTRODUCTION In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether real property in Santa Monica (the City) owned by plaintiff Or Khaim Hashalom (OKH) qualifies for the statutory exemption from historic preservation provided by Government Code section 37361, subdivision (c). That statute creates an exemption for noncommercial property owned by a religious organization.
In Re Episcopal Church Casespublic domain
61 Cal.Rptr.3d 845 (2007) 152 Cal.App.4th 808 EPISCOPAL CHURCH CASES. Nos. G036096, G036408, G036868. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District, Division Three. June 25, 2007. *847 Holme Roberts & Owen, John R. Shiner, Los Angeles, Brent E. Rychener; Horvitz & Levy, Frederic Cohen and Jeremy Rosen, En
FILED 15-0547 7/24/2015 5:49:28 PM tex-6223072 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK
ACCEPTED 03-15-00293-CV 8312780 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
County of Santa Clara v. Southern Pac. R. Co.public domain
Sawveh, J., concurring. The discussion in this opinion, though applicable to all the cases tried, will have special reference to the facts in the case of Santa Clara county, No. 3,074. This case is similar, in the main features, to that of San Mateo Co. v. Southern Pac. R. Co., decided by this court last year. 8 Sawy. 281; [S. C. 18 Fed. Rep. 147, 722.]
Segovia v. Shoenmannpublic domain
404 B.R. 896 (2009) In re Maria O. SEGOVIA, Debtor. Maria O. Segovia, Debtor/Appellant, v. E. Lynn Shoenmann, Defendant/Appellee. No. C 08-3075 PJH. Bankr.Case No. 06-30387. Adv. Case No. 05-3441. United States District Court, N.D. California. March 30, 2009. *900 Law Offices of Neal H. Konami, Oakland, CA, for Debtor.
Perry v. Schwarzeneggerpublic domain
704 F.Supp.2d 921 (2010) Kristin M. PERRY, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs, City and County of San Francisco, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; Edmund G. Brown Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health and State Registrar
McRae v. Califanopublic domain
491 F.Supp. 630 (1980) Cora McRAE, Jane Doe, Mary Doe, Susan Roe, Ann Moe, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Planned Parenthood of New York City, Inc.; and Irwin B. Teran, M. D., Jane Hodgson, M. D., David B. Bingham, M. D., Hugh Savage, M. D., Edgar W. Jackson, Lewis H. Koplik, M. D., Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Women's Division of the Board of Global Ministries of the United Methodist Church,
State v. T. R. R. Co.public domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 55 The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion. This is the second appeal in this case. (46 Pac. 723.) Appellant made the statutory statement to the assessor fixing the value of its main and side track in Washoe county at $131,800. Notwithstanding this it was assessed at $254