Cases

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Filed: January 22, 2020 No. 18-1085 CALIFORNIA COMMUNITIES AGAINST TOXICS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND ANDREW WHEELER, ADMINISTRATOR, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENTS AIR PERMITTING FORUM, ET AL.,

MEMORANDUM OPINION TANYA S. CHUTEAN, United States District Judge Plaintiffs, a’ number of environmental advocacy groups, bring this action against the. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) pursuant to the Clean Air Act’s citizen suit provision, 42 • U.S.C. § 7604(a)(2), to compel the agency to perform rulemakings mandated by the Act to protect people a

Rogers, Circuit Judge: In 1976, Congress enacted the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 ("RCRA"), as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 6901 - 6992k, to address the environmental and health risks associated with hazardous solid waste. Subtitle C of RC

OPINION PER CURIAM: Two environmental groups petition for review of a final rulemaking by the EPA. The groups and the EPA agree this case should be remanded, so the only dispute is whether vacatur is appropriate. Background The Clean Air Act requires the EPA to set national ambient air quality standa

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CALIFORNIA COMMUNITIES AGAINST  TOXICS, an unincorporated association; COMMUNITIES FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT, a California non-profit organization, Petitioners, v.  UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL No. 11-71127 PROTECTION AGENCY; LISA JACKSON, OPINION Administrator, U.S. Environmental Pr

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 6, 2022 Decided June 30, 2023 No. 21-1018 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENT AEROSPACE INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. AND THE BOEING COMPANY, INTERVENORS

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 1, 2019 Decided August 20, 2019 No. 18-1085 CALIFORNIA COMMUNITIES AGAINST TOXICS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND ANDREW WHEELER, ADMINISTRATOR, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENTS AIR PERMITTING FORUM, ET AL

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 598 U. S. Part 2 Pages 651–728 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT May 25, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

Case: 24-60084 Document: 150-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/21/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 598 U. S. Part 2 Pages 651–728 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT May 25, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2022 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

MEMORANDUM * Pétitioners challenge the Environmental Protection Agency’s (“EPA”) approval of South Coast Air Quality Management District (“District”) Rule 1315 into the California State Implementation Plan (“SIP”). Rule 1315 specifies the district’s procedures for tracking and banking emissions reductions for later use as offset credits for new sources of pollution. We conclude that the EPA was neither arbit

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 14, 2025 Decided September 5, 2025 No. 23-1267 SSM LITIGATION GROUP, PETITIONER v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENT CALIFORNIA COMMUNITIES AGAINST TOXICS, ET AL., INTERVENORS On Petition for Review of a Final Action

Case: 17-60088 Document: 00517030553 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/11/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued March 7, 2024 Decided June 28, 2024 No. 22-1056 ELECTRIC ENERGY, INC., ET AL., PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND MICHAEL S. REGAN, ADMINISTRATOR, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENTS STATE OF TEXAS, ET AL.,

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2024 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 6, 2019 Decided July 10, 2020 No. 18-1203 CLEAN WISCONSIN, PETITIONER v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND ANDREW WHEELER, ADMINISTRATOR, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENTS BCCA APPEAL GROUP, ET AL.,

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 22-2287 ____________ THE CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; ADMINISTRATOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY LACEY BROWN; CAPE FEAR RIVER WATCH; CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL H

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued March 21, 2024 Decided September 3, 2024 No. 22-1271 UNITED STATES SUGAR CORPORATION, PETITIONER v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENT SIERRA CLUB, INTERVENOR Consolidated with 22-1302, 22-1303 On Petiti

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 7, 2019 Decided April 7, 2020 No. 18-1167 SIERRA CLUB, PETITIONER v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND ANDREW WHEELER, ADMINISTRATOR, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENTS AIR PERMITTING FORUM, ET AL.,