⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Calhoun v. Google LLC”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024-08-20 · Published · cited 3× · 113 F.4th 1141
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PATRICK CALHOUN; ELAINE No. 22-16993 CRESPO; MICHAEL HENRY; CORNICE WILSON; RODNEY D.C. No. 4:20-cv- JOHNSON; CLAUDIA KINDLER, 05146-YGR Plaintiffs-Appellants, OPINION v. GOOGLE, LLC, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2017-08-29 · Published · cited 10× · 264 F. Supp. 3d 1148
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James 0 Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Breach of Fiduciary Duty (Doc. 272) and Memorandum Opinion and Order (Doc. 274), filed May 9, 2017 (Doc. 280)(“Motion for Reconsideration”). The Court held hearings on April 26, 2
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2017-04-25 · Published · cited 26× · 250 F. Supp. 3d 856; 2017 WL 1487439; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62790
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the requests in the Plaintiffs’ Mo*867tion to Strike Affirmative Defenses, filed November 4, 2015 (Doc. 191)(“Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses”); (ii) the requests in the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on
District Court, S.D. New York · 2016-03-31 · Published · cited 25× · 175 F. Supp. 3d 280; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44283; 2016 WL 1312139
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER PAUL G. GARDEPHE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. Plaintiff Hanna Bouveng brings this action against Defendants NYG Capital LLC, d/b/a New York Global Group (“NYGG”), FNL Media LLC (“FNL Media”), and Benjamin Wey alleging claims of (1) quid pro quo sexual harassment under the New York State Human Rights Law (the “NYSHRL”) and New York City Human Rights Law (the “NYCHRL”) again
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017-06-26 · Published · cited 5× · 321 F.R.D. 125; 2017 WL 2734280
MEMORANDUM PADOVA, District Judge TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ...134 II. BACKGROUND ...134 III. THE CLASS CERTIFICATION RECORD .. .135 A. Background Regarding Ocwen’s In-House Balloon Loan Modifications and its Documentation Systems ... 135 B. The Class Representatives ... 136 1. Plaintiffs Li
SA Bay LLC v. Hallpublic domain
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2012-02-01 · Published · cited 2× · 849 F. Supp. 2d 761; 2012 WL 300735; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12006
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER JOHN D. RAINEY, Senior District Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff SA Bay, LLC’s (“Plaintiff’) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Liability (Dkt. No 27), to which Defendants Buford “Bubba” Hall (“Hall”) and Cynthia Alford (“Alford”) (collectively “Defendants”) have responded (Dkt. No. 33),1 and Plaintiff has replied (Dkt. No. 35). Al
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2017-07-31 · Published · cited 2× · 133 Fed. Cl. 496; 2017 WL 4366242
OPINION AND ORDER SWEENEY, Judge In this postaward bid protest, plaintiff Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions, LLC (“Torres”) contends that the United States Department of State (“State Department”) improperly awarded a contract for local guard services at a United States embassy to defendant-intervenor G4S Joint Venture (“G4S”). Specifically, Torres alleges several irregularities with the State Department’s
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2017-10-02 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-868C (Filed Under Seal: July 31, 2017) (Reissued for Publication: October 2, 2017)* ************************************* TORRES ADVANCED ENTERPRISE * SOLUTIONS, LLC, * * Plaintiff, * * v.
District Court, D. Colorado · 2012-05-30 · Published · cited 12× · 872 F. Supp. 2d 1154; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74384; 2012 WL 1949008
*1159ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WILEY Y. DANIEL, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment filed on January 6, 2012 by Defendant United-Health Group Incorporated [“Defendant” or “United Health”]. A response was filed on March 13, 2012, and a reply was file
A. B. v. Salesforcepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024-12-19 · Published · cited 6× · 123 F.4th 788
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit FILED No. 23-20604 December 19, 2024 ____________
A. B. v. Salesforcepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024-12-19 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 23-20604 Document: 96-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/19/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 23-20604
Brown v. Salcidopublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026-04-20 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHASOM BROWN; MARIA No. 24-5692 NGUYEN; WILLIAM BYATT, D.C. No. 4:20-cv-03664- Plaintiffs - Appellees, YGR v. GOOGLE LLC, a Delaware OPINION company, Defendant - Appellee, v. ADAM
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025-03-26 · Published · cited 5× · 2025 Ohio 1047
[Cite as Orion Mgt., Inc. v. Kaeka, 2025-Ohio-1047.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) ORION MANAGEMENT, INC. C.A. No. 30797 Appellant/Cross-Apellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2024-10-31 · Published · cited 0×
FILED OCTOBER 31, 2024 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE SARAH NUNLEY AND
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022-01-27 · Published · cited 23× · 23 F.4th 1262
Appellate Case: 20-8038 Document: 010110637712 Date Filed: 01/27/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH January 27, 2022 UNITED STATES COU
Kulbicki v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2014-08-27 · Published · cited 1× · 2014 Md. LEXIS 535; 440 Md. 33; 99 A.3d 730
McDONALD, J., dissenting, in which HARRELL and RODOWSKY, JJ., join This is a troubling case—for many reasons. A jury concluded that Petitioner James Kulbicki, a police officer, murdered, execution-style, a young woman with whom he had had an extra-marital affair and by whom he had fathered a child.1 The evidence supporting that verdict—ey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016-03-17 · Published · cited 65× · 815 F.3d 1145; 118 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1157; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 5026; 2016 WL 1056082
Opinion by Judge TALLMAN; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge MILAN D. SMITH, JR. TALLMAN, Circuit Judge: ORDER The opinion and dissent filed on September 14, 2015 and published at 801 F.3d 1126 are hereby amended. The amended opinion and dissent are filed concurrently with this order. With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny Universal’s
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015-09-14 · Published · cited 3× · 801 F.3d 1126; 115 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1965; 43 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2305; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 16308; 2015 WL 5315388
*1129 OPINION TALLMAN, Circuit Judge: Stephanie Lenz filed suit under 17 U.S.C. § 512(f) — part of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) — against Universal Music Corp., Universal Music Publishing, Inc., and Universal Music Publishing Group (collectively “Universal”). S
District Court, D. Kansas · 2018-08-30 · Published · cited 0× · 337 F. Supp. 3d 1122
Daniel D. Crabtree, United States District Judge *1128This lawsuit brings the court a dispute that pits two important values in the American experience against one another: "free exercise of religion and effective use by the state of its police powers." Messiah Baptist Church v. Cty. of Jefferson, Colo. ,
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020-08-12 · Published · cited 130× · 969 F.3d 638
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0257p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT JOHNNY TLAPANCO, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant, │ │