Cases

Brandon J. Harrison, Judge | iThis appeal arises out of an-automobile collision where appellant Eileen Madden was ejected from her vehicle and sustained serious injuries. Madden sued the manufacturers and sellers of her vehicle and its seatbelt in the Jackson County Circuit Court alleging that her seatbelt was defective, that the defect caused her seatbelt

982 F.2d 1422 37 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 752 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Kenneth N. POWELL, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Melvin L. GANN, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Gerry H. CALE, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Andrew J. WHITMORE, II, Defendant-Appell

19-2155 In Re: Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Products Liability Litigation (No. II) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2020 (Argued: December 2, 2020 Decided: December 8,2020) Docket No. 19-2155 IN RE: MIRENA IUS LEVONORGESTREL-RELATED PRODUCTS LIABILITY

[Cite as Miller v. Rice Drilling D L.L.C., 2023-Ohio-3588.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT BELMONT COUNTY SHAWN MILLER et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RICE DRILLING D LLC et al.,

PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge. Defendants were convicted of conspiracy to distribute marijuana under 21 U.S.C. § 846. They appeal their convictions and sentences. Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742. Background In 1986, defendants Andrew J. (“A.J.”) Whitmore and Kenneth (“Keno”) Powell formed a partnership to import large quantities of marijuana from Texas

Appendix A Department of Justice Chart Documenting Sentences in Capitol Breach Cases Monday, January 6, 2025 SENTENCES IMPOSED IN CASES ARISING OUT OF THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6, 2021 Disclaimer: Those relying on information contained in this document should verify all information for accuracy Table 1: Cases in which the government recommended a probation sentence without home detention 1 0F Defendant Ca

Sections 23 and 24 in Cincinnati township in Harrison county are separated by a north-and-south county road. Plaintiffs Nixon and Bierring own land along the east side of the road in Section 24 and the defendant Verna Welch owns land along the west side of the road in Section 23. Plaintiffs sued Verna Welch and her husband and the board of supervisors *Page 36 alleging that the surface water drained south across the west part of the Nixon land onto the Bi

MEMORANDUM OPINION and ALL CASES ORDER INGE PRYTZ JOHNSON, District Judge. This cause comes before the court on defendant’s motions to exclude certain general causation and liability opinions offered by various plaintiffs’ experts (doc. 578), and numerous briefs and evidence filed in support of and in opposition to said motions. Specifically, defendant challenges plaintiffs’ designated experts Dr. Richard

ACCEPTED 07-14-00405-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 2/18/2015 4:43:44 PM

CHRISTIAN, J. This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit court of the city of Richmond. ■ The facts disclosed by the record are as follows: • Richard A. Carrington died intestate, some time during the year 1855, seized of a large real estate in the *city of Richmond. He left surviving him a widow and four children. Soon after his death a certain portion of ' his rea

CHRISTIAN, J. This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit court of the city of Richmond. ■ The facts disclosed by the record are as follows: • Richard A. Carrington died intestate, some time during the year 1855, seized of a large real estate in the *city of Richmond. He left surviving him a widow and four children. Soon after his death a certain portion of ' his rea

CHRISTIAN, J. This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit court of the city of Richmond. ■ The facts disclosed by the record are as follows: • Richard A. Carrington died intestate, some time during the year 1855, seized of a large real estate in the *city of Richmond. He left surviving him a widow and four children. Soon after his death a certain portion of ' his rea

Green, Judge: This action was brought by the plaintiff, Nancy A. Pegram, against John G. Stortz^ a saloon-keeper, for selling intoxicating liquor to her husband after he had been served by her with a written notice not to do so, whereby he became intoxicated, and by reason thereof injured her in her means of support. The action is given by a statute passed in 1877. See chapter 107, § 16, which is as follows :

JOYNFS, J. This is an action of debt upon a single bill brought by William Churn against John H. Powell, Jackson B. Powell, George S. Powell and A. J. Ward. The bond, as written, purports to be the bond of John H. Powell as principal, and of the other parties and Robert W. Powell as securities. It was not executed by Robert W. Powell, a vacant space and seal being left for his name between those of Jackson B. Powell and George

JOYNFS, J. This is an action of debt upon a single bill brought by William Churn against John H. Powell, Jackson B. Powell, George S. Powell and A. J. Ward. The bond, as written, purports to be the bond of John H. Powell as principal, and of the other parties and Robert W. Powell as securities. It was not executed by Robert W. Powell, a vacant space and seal being left for his name between those of Jackson B. Powell and George

JOYNFS, J. This is an action of debt upon a single bill brought by William Churn against John H. Powell, Jackson B. Powell, George S. Powell and A. J. Ward. The bond, as written, purports to be the bond of John H. Powell as principal, and of the other parties and Robert W. Powell as securities. It was not executed by Robert W. Powell, a vacant space and seal being left for his name between those of Jackson B. Powell and George

STATEMENT. WOODSON, J. This is an original proceeding in the nature of quo warranto, instituted in this court on March 29, 1905, by the Attorney-General, to forfeit the charter of the Waters-Pierce Oil Company, which will hereafter be called the Waters-Pierce Company, and to revoke the licenses to do business in this State of the Standard Oil Company of Indiana, which will hereafter be called the Indiana