Cases

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Petty, Beales and O’Brien Argued by teleconference PUBLISHED TOBIAS O. REED OPINION BY v. Record No. 1305-15-4 JUDGE RANDOLPH A. BEALES NOVEMBER 12, 2019 COM

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Beales, Alston and O’Brien Argued at Alexandria, Virginia PUBLISHED TOBIAS OGBANNA REED OPINION BY v. Record No. 1305-15-4 JUDGE ROSSIE D. ALSTON, JR. OCTOBER 16, 201

BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge: In considering appellants’ contention that evidence of methamphetamine manufacture should have been suppressed, we must determine, inter alia, whether violation of a state trespass law by its law enforcement officers compels, under principles of federalism, suppression of evidence obtained as a result and offered to prove violation o

Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (2019 NY Slip Op 03883) Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. 2019 NY Slip Op 03883 Decided on May 16, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department

STARK, U.S. District Judge: This appeal relates to nine Delaware bankruptcy cases, each commenced in connection with the respective debtors' asbestos-related liabilities ("Consolidated *738Cases"). The appeal arises from the most recent attempt to access thousands of exhibits ("2019 Exhibits") that were submitted to the Bankruptcy Court pursu

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REED O’CONNOR, District Judge. Before the Court are Defendant’s Motion for New Trial (ECF No. 72), filed June 30, 2014; the Government’s response (ECF No. 74), filed July 2, 2014; and the Government’s supplemental response (ECF No. 78), filed July 9, 2014. The issue- in this case is whether the Court erred in admitting photographs at trial that were obtained as a result of the

MEREDITH, J. In this appeal, the State, appellant, challenges the ruling of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County suppressing evidence discovered during a traffic stop of Chuckie Donaldson, appellee. The State concedes that the officer who performed the search lacked probable cause to search appellee, but argues that, because appel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NAMIG BAKER, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 22-2765 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINIO

DECISION AND ORDER HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This ease is before the Court on the Government’s objections to Magistrate Judge Scott’s Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 107, United States v. Fisher, 2016 WL 2779018 (W.D.N.Y. May 13, 2016)), which recommends dismissing the superseding indictment without prejudice. In the alternative, Judge Scott recommends striki

POOLE, Circuit Judge: Appellants Frank Reed and David Smith appeal their convictions under 18 U.S.C. § 844(i) for conspiracy to damage and destroy, and maliciously damaging and destroying, property used in interstate commerce by means of an explosive or incendiary device, and for failure to register a firearm under 26 U.S.C. § 5861

731 F.Supp.2d 1178 (2010) Beatrice L. WOODWARD, Calandra McCabe, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Kenneth L. SALAZAR, Secretary, Department of the Interior, Defendant. No. CIV 09-0719 JB/RHS. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. July 15, 2010. *1179 Jeffrey A. Dahl, Keleher & McLeod, P.A., Albuquerque

PD-1575-15 Supreme Court ^Ryj&\K COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEM-b Of Cm 30 2015 Criminal Appeals Aba! Acosta

JUSTICE BOATRIGHT, concurring in part and dissenting in part. ¶58 The majority reaches the remarkable conclusion that a hearing regarding a motion to quash a grand jury subpoena is not a grand jury proceeding. The majority reaches this conclusion despite the fact that the motion to quash the grand jury subpoena was filed in the grand jury case, to be ruled upon by the judge responsible for the gr

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 25-1396 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Christopher L. Carroll, also known as Chris; Whiskey Dix Big Truck Repair, LLC

154 F.Supp.2d 1016 (2001) UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff v. Eulric WARE Defendant No. CRIM. A. 3:00CR-59-H. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, at Louisville. July 13, 2001. *1017 *1018 *1019 Monica Wheatley, United States Attorney's Office, Lo

Opinion by Judge CRISWELL. Defendant, Vincent T. Me Coy, appeals from a judgment of conviction on two counts of aggravated robbery. He argues that the police did not have probable cause for his arrest and, therefore, that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to that arrest. We reverse. In February 1987, a jewelry store in Denver was robbed at

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0051p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plain

(2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Leif D. ROZIN, et al., Defendants. No. 1:05-cr-139. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. February 27, 2008. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS ROZIN'S & KALLICK'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE THE TESTIMONY OR STATEMENTS OF ALAN W. KOEHLER; IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO DISMISS THE INDICTMENT, DUE TO VI

26 F.Supp.2d 24 (1998) UNITED STATES of America, v. Henry G. CISNEROS, et al., Defendants. No. CRIM. A. 97-0485(SS). United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 30, 1998. Opinion Denying Reconsideration September 17, 1998. *25 *26 *27

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED August 29, 2025 No. 25-30105