Cases

Lawrence J. O'Neill, UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE *891I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs US Citrus Science Council, Santa Paula Creek Ranch, CPR Farms, Green Leaf Farms, Inc., Bravante Produce, and Richard Bagdasarian, Inc. (collectively, "Plaintiffs") bring this action against Defendants United States

157 Ariz. 562 (1988) 760 P.2d 562 CENTRAL CITRUS COMPANY, an Arizona corporation, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and Maricopa County, Defendants/Appellees. No. 2 CA-CV 88-0011. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department B. February 29, 1988. As Corrected April 4, 1988. Review Denied Septem

912 F.Supp. 1325 (1995) UNITED STATES ex rel. SEQUOIA ORANGE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. SUNLAND PACKING HOUSE COMPANY, Defendants. UNITED STATES ex rel. SEQUOIA ORANGE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. SAN JOAQUIN CITRUS, and Sunkist Growers, Inc., Defendants. UNITED STATES ex rel. SEQUOIA ORANGE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. BAIRD-NEECE PACKING CORP., and Sunkist Growers, Inc., Defendants. UNITED STATES ex rel. SEQUOIA ORANGE COMPANY, Plai

854 F.Supp. 669 (1994) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. SUNNY COVE CITRUS ASS'N, Defendant. DIST. I INDEPENDENT HANDLERS, Plaintiffs, v. Edward MADIGAN, Secretary of Agriculture, Defendant. SUNNY COVE CITRUS ASS'N et al., Plaintiffs, v. Michael ESPY, Secretary of Agriculture, Defendant. Nos. CV-F-91-311 OWW, CV-F-91-202 OWW and CV-F-92-5253 OWW. United States District Cou

327 So.2d 212 (1976) LAKE REGION PACKING ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. Flora Flynn FURZE, for Herself and As Guardian Ad Litem for Mary Lewis and Alice Ellingson, Etc., et al., Respondents. No. 47410. Supreme Court of Florida. February 11, 1976. Rehearing Denied March 31, 1976. *213 Christopher C. Fo

BARNES, Circuit Judge. This is a private action for treble damages under the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A, §§ 1-7, 15. Appellants are Sunkist Growers, Inc., a corporation (hereinafter referred to as Sunkist) and The Exchange Orange Products Company, a corporation (hereinafter referred to as Exchange Orange or EOP). Appellees are Winckler & Smith Citrus Products Co., a corporation and Ronald Walker, as trustee of Winckler &

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Motorists Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ironics, Inc., Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-841.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of an

284 F.2d 1 SUNKIST GROWERS, INC., a Corporation, and The ExchangeOrange Products Company, a Corporation, Appellants,v.WINCKLER & SMITH CITRUS PRODUCTS CO., a Corporation, andRonald Walker,Trustee, Appellees. No. 15242. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Sept. 30, 1960. Ross C. Fisher, Herman

522 F.3d 215 (2008) Karen McLAUGHLIN, Jane Amodeo, David Tuttleman, Susan Bailey, Barbara Bishop, Trevor Campbell, Fergal Furlong, David Rogers, Barbara Schwab, Patricia Scocozza, and Jim Sherman, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY, Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA Inc., Lorillard Tobacqo Co, British American Tobacco Limited, Liggett Group, Inc., B.A.T. Industries P.L.C., and RJ. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Defendants-Appellants.

397 F.3d 925 David E. RIDENOUR; Jeffrey B. Peters; Mark Graf, Plaintiffs-Appellants,United States of America, ex rel., Plaintiff-Appellee,v.KAISER-HILL COMPANY, L.L.C., and Statutory Agent: Corporation Services Company; Wackenhut Services Limited Liability Company, and Statutory Agent: James A. Dierker; EG & G Rocky Flats, Inc., and Statutory Agent: C.T. Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 01-1510.

The question presented by this appeal is whether services rendered by certain *Page 98 employees of the Arizona Citrus Growers, a corporation, during the period in controversy (January 1, 1940, to June 16, 1941) were, as the law then stood, engaged in "agricultural labor" and therefore exempt from coverage under the Unemployment Compensation Law of 1936, as amended. The appellee, the Arizona Citrus Growers, hereinafter referred to as the Associatio

615 F.Supp. 916 (1985) HOWARD GAULT COMPANY, Barrett-Fisher Company, E.C. Reinauer & Sons, Inc., Griffin and Brand Sales Agency, Inc., T.J. Power and Company, Tri-Frye Brand, La Mantia-Cullum-Collier and Company of Dimmitt, Deck Produce Company, Dimco Industries, Inc., Smith Potato, Inc., Barrett Produce Company, Colville and Wilson, Inc., H & S Produce Company, Walker Brothers Produce Company, Inc., Boozer Produce Company, High Plains Vegetable

229 F.Supp. 586 (1964) HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. STANDARD OIL COMPANY (KENTUCKY), Defendant. Civ. A. No. 3137. United States District Court S. D. Mississippi, Jackson Division. March 13, 1964. *587 *588 *589

KEETON, District Judge. In this appeal, Soule Glass and Glazing Company and three related Soule firms 1 (“the company”) petition this court to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board (“the Board”) finding the Company guilty of a number of unfai

Liu, J. *1129 In 1975, the Legislature enacted the Agricultural Labor Relations Act (ALRA) "to encourage and protect the right of agricultural employees to full freedom of association, self-organization, and designation of representatives of their own choosing, to negotiate the terms an

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2020 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

Filed 12/19/19 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEAU GORDON, D075373 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Super. Ct. No. CIVRS 1302604) ARC MANUFACTURING, INC., et al., Defendants and Appellants; GOLDEN

346 F.Supp.2d 1075 (2004) CACTUS CORNER, LLC, a California Limited Liability Corporation; Venida Packing Company, a California Corporation; California Citrus Mutual; and California Grape and Tree Fruit League, Plaintiffs, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; Ann V. Veneman, Secretary of Agriculture; and Bobby R. Acord, Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Defendants, InterCitrus, a Spanish Trade Association; Ibertrade Comm

EFiled: May 24 2022 01:53PM EDT Transaction ID 67654390 Case No. 2021-0420-JTL IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ROBERT GARFIELD, derivatively on behalf of THE ) ODP CORPORATION and individually on behalf of ) himself and all other similarly situated stockholders, )

45 Cal.Rptr.3d 609 (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 1584 The HESS COLLECTION WINERY, Petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Fresh Fruit and Vegetables Workers Local 1096, Real Party in Interest. No. C046405. Court of Appeal, Third District. July 5, 2006.