Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Cabrera v. Baird”
COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE Patricia W. Griffin CHANCERY COURTHOUSE MASTER IN CHANCERY 34 The Circle GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE 19947 Date Submitted
Ramon Cabrera v. Statepublic domain
Jose Ortega Cabrera v. Municipality of Bayamonpublic domain
*94 COFFIN, Chief Judge. Plaintiffs are the occupants of four tracts of land in the Buena Vista Ward of the municipality of Bayamon, Puerto Rico. In January, 1972, the municipality opened a sanitary landfill near plaintiffs’ properties, the operation of which
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Conditionally Granted, in Part, and Denied, in Part, and Opinion filed December 29, 2009. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals N
Snyder v. U.S. Bank N.A.public domain
MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge: The plaintiffs in this case filed suit against U.S. Bank N.A., Wilmington Trust, *869N.A., and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company on behalf of a putative class, alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). Specifically, the plaintiffs allege that the defendant banks owned certain
State v. McIntirepublic domain
Appellant-defendant Michael McIntire appeals an order declaring him to be a sexual predator pursuant to R.C. 2950.09 (C). We reverse. I As a youth McIntire was adjudicated delinquent by the Juvenile Division of the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas for committing an act that would have constituted a sexual offense if McIntire had been an adult. As a result, McIntire was committed to the custody
State v. Olahpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 588 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 589 This cause was heard upon the record in the trial court. Each error assigned has been reviewed and the following disposition is made:
The People v. Jose M. Riverapublic domain
State of New York MEMORANDUM Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 64 The People &c., Respondent, v. Jose M. Rivera, Appellant. Guy Talia, for appellant. Lisa Gray, for respondent. Hon. Letitia James, New York State Attorney Gene
Correia v. NB Baker Elec., Inc.public domain
HALLER, J. *608Plaintiffs Mark Correia and Richard Stow sued their former employer, NB Baker Electric, Inc. (Baker), alleging wage and hour violations and seeking civil penalties under the Private Attorney General Act of 2004 (PAGA). ( *179Lab. Code, § 269
Philip Morris USA v. Glogerpublic domain
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed March 20, 2019. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D18-341 Lower Tribunal No. 11-23377 ________________ Philip Morris USA, Inc., et al.,
Sciarrone v. Village of Island Lake, Illinoispublic domain
2025 IL App (2d) 240153 No. 2-24-0153 Opinion filed September 18, 2025 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ ANTHONY P. SCIARRO
Correia v. NB Baker Electric, Inc.public domain
Filed 2/25/19 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA MARK CORREIA et al., D073798 Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2017-00019945-CU-OE-NC) NB BAKER ELECTRIC, INC.
Lioce v. Cohenpublic domain
OPINION By the Court, Hardesty, J.: The defendants in each of the four underlying personal injury cases were represented by the same attorney, who gave substantially the same closing argument on behalf of his clients at each trial. Asserting that defense counsel’s closing arguments constituted misconduct, the plaintiffs in each case sought new trials, with varying success. These consolidat
Roberto Alvarado v. Statepublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-08-00541-CR Roberto Alvarado, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 299th JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-DC-07-302368, HONORABLE CHARLES BAIRD, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION
Roberto Alvarado v. Statepublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-08-00541-CR Roberto Alvarado, Appellant v.
Lioce v. Cohenpublic domain
*6OPINION By the Court, Hardesty, J.: INTRODUCTION On December 28, 2006, this court issued an opinion in these consolidated appeals.2 The defendants in each of the four underlying personal injury cases were represented by the same attorney, who gave substantially the same closing arg
United States v. Davilapublic domain
HOWARD, Chief Judge. These appeals arise out of a widespread corruption scandal at the Puerto Rico Board of Medical Examiners (the “Board”), the former licensing authority for doctors seeking to practice in Puerto Rico. Cesar Berroa, Julio Castro,'Geraldo Castro, Raysa Pacheco-Medina, and Glenda Davila all sought medical licenses but failed to pass the required exams. Undeterred, they attempted to gain certification by obtai
Rinehart ex rel. Buzzo v. Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc.public domain
PER CURIAM: This case returns to the Court for the second time since 2013. After the September 2008 bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. (“Lehman”), Plaintiffs-Appellants (“Plaintiffs”) brought suit on behalf of a putative class, of former participants in an employee stock ownership plan (“ESOP”) invested exclusively in Lehman’s common stock. Plaintiffs alleged that Defendants-Appellees (“Plan Committee Defendants”
State Ex Rel. Foy v. Vanderbilt Capital Advisorspublic domain
Office of the Director New Mexico 07:57:16 2022.06.13 Compilation '00'06- Commission IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2022-NMCA-026 Filing Date: June 9, 2020 No. A-1-CA-36925 STATE OF NEW MEXICO ex rel. FRANK C. FOY, JOHN CASEY, and SUZANNE FOY, Qui Tam Plaintiffs-Appellants, v
Doe v. George Wash. Univ.public domain
REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge The plaintiffs filed this civil action, using the pseudonyms Jane Does 1 to 5, against George Washington University ("GW") and Kyle Renner, a GW employee being sued in his capacity as GW's General Operations Manager and the plaintiffs' supervisor (collectively, "the defendants"), pursuant to the District of Columbia's Human Rights Act ("D.C. Human Rights Act"),