Cases

517 F.3d 433 (2008) Cynthia LAMBERT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Greg HARTMAN, in his official capacity as Clerk of Courts, and Hamilton County Board of County Commissioners, Defendants-Appellees. No. 07-3154. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: January 30, 2008. Decided and Filed: February 25, 2008. *434

CRAIN, J. |2The defendant, Joan Faye Hartman, was indicted for the second-degree murder of Tanya Carolina Knower. See La. R.S. 14:30.1. A jury found the defendant guilty of manslaughter, and the trial court sentenced her to thirty-five years imprisonment at hard labor. See La. R.S. 14:31; La.Code Crim. Pro. art. 814. The defendant appeals arguing that the State failed to prove she did not act in self-defense,

841 F.Supp. 946 (1994) John HARTMAN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PETALUMA, Petaluma Police Department, and Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. No. C-93-0984 DLJ. United States District Court, N.D. California. January 4, 1994. *947 William J. Arnone, Jr., of Merrill, Arnone & Handelman, Santa Rosa, CA, for plaintiff. Cy

WOOD, Chief Judge. While Governor Scott Walker was leading the charge for controversial changes to Wisconsin’s public" union laws, plaintiff-appellant Cynthia Archer was at his side, drafting the law and advocating for its passage. At the same time, the Milwaukee County State’s Attorney’s Office was investigating allegations of misconduct against Archer and several of the governor

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-21-00098-CV STACI DENNY, APPELLANT V. GEORGE REINEMUND D/B/A GEORGE REINEMUND REAL ESTATE, AND KLAUS P. HARTMANN, AND CYNTHIA HARTMAN, AND JACKIE LOVE, APPELLEES On

OPINION {¶ 1} Appellant, Maria C. Triozzi-Hartman, appeals from the March 29, 2006 judgment entry of the Geauga County Court of Common Pleas, adopting the magistrate's findings regarding a settlement agreement reached by the parties. {¶ 2} On April 29, 2005, appellant filed a complaint for divorce against appellee, Andrew J. Hartman. The divorce was set for trial on January

OPINION AND ORDER SWEENEY, Judge. As a result of Ernst & Young LLP’s sale of its consulting services business in 2000, William F. Hartman received stock in Cap Gemini, S.A. He and his wife, Therese Hartman, reported the receipt of that stock as income on their 2000 federal income tax return and paid the resulting tax. They now seek a partial refund of the tax they paid, alleging that Mr. Hartma

Welch, J. The defendant, Thomas J. Fitzgerald (“Fitzgerald”), has appealed the trial court’s judgment against Fitzgerald on the plaintiffs’ G.L.c. 93A claim and its assessment of double damages and attorney’s fees in the total amount of $53,463.99. Fitzgerald asserts on appeal that no demand letter was entered into evidence and, therefore, that the trial judge erred in finding a violation of G.L.c. 93A.2

333 F.Supp.2d 632 (2004) Brett HARTMAN, Petitioner, v. Margaret BAGLEY, Warden, Respondent. No. 1:02-CV-1336. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. August 31, 2004. *633 *634 *635 *636

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 08a0089p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellant, - CYNTHIA LAMBERT,

942 So.2d 1140 (2006) Eva Hartman, Wife of/and Rayford HARTMAN v. CARCO, INC., American Claims Service, Parish of Jefferson, City of Westwego, and XYZ Insurance Company. No. 06-CA-203. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. September 26, 2006. *1141 R. Glenn Cater, Cater & Willis, New Orleans, Louisiana, Alfred Barrera,

In this proceeding concerning grandparent visitation under §19-1-117, C.R.S. 2004, the petitioners, D.C. and D.C. (grandparents), appeal from the order of the trial court dismissing their petition for lack of standing. We affirm. Grandparents are the maternal grandmother and stepgrandfather of J.R.-M., A.R.-M., and X.S.L. (the children). Respondent J.C.L. (mother) is the mother of the children. Respondent never married the father of the older

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be Nov 10 2015, 9:30 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Jeremy K. Nix

Spina, J. The plaintiff in the civil action below, having prevailed on the merits of his claims in Superior Court, appealed the form of the judgment ordered by the trial judge with respect to the remedies granted against certain relief defendants2 pursuant to the plaintiffs claims under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA), G. L. c. 109A. We granted the plaintiff’s application for direct appell

Lundberg Stratton, J. In this appeal, defendant-appellant, Brett X. Hartman, raises thirteen propositions of law. Finding none meritorious, we affirm his convictions. We have also independently weighed the aggravating circumstance against the mitigating factors and compared his sentence to those imposed in similar cases, as R.C. 2929.05(A) requires. As a result, we affirm defendant’s convictions and sentence of death.

119 F.Supp.2d 668 (2000) Terry E. HARTMAN and Jon G. Thorne, Plaintiffs, v. TEXACO, INC., Defendant. No. Civ.A. H-99-2757. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. October 6, 2000. *669 Marcus Eugene Faubion, Jr., Houston, TX, for Terry E. Hartman, plaintiff. Steven W. Sloan, Thompson & Knight, Dalla

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 07–0729 Filed February 6, 2009 CYNTHIA MARTINEK, Appellee, vs. BELMOND-KLEMME COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellant. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Wright County, Paul W. Riffel, Judge. A school district seeks further review of a court of appeals decision affirming the judgment of the district

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 93 Ohio St.3d 274.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. HARTMAN, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Hartman, 2001-Ohio-1580.] Criminal law—Aggravated murder—Death penalty upheld, when. (No. 98-1475—Submitted June 20, 2001—Decided October 3, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Common Pleas of Summit County, No. CR97-09-1987. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J.

Welsh, J. This is a voluntary report of an interlocutory ruling denying the defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment. G.L.c. 231, §108; Dist./Mun. Cts. R *153A. D. A., Rule 5. The defendants contend that the plaintiffs claim for loss of future rent is barred by the doctrine of claim preclusion. The motion judge ruled otherwise, and elected to report that ruling to

Karen King Mitchell, Judge Michael and Barbie Nolte (collectively “Nolte”) appeal the trial court’s judgment, entered following a jury verdict in favor of Ford Motor Company, ’ on their product liability claims related to the placement and design of the fuel storage system in Ford’s 2003 Crown Victoria Police Interceptor. 1 </