Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “CYNTHIA C. DEVINE”
Danette Mertz v. Cynthia Sullivanpublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA PUBLISHED Present: Judges Chaney, Callins and Senior Judge Humphreys Argued at Leesburg, Virginia DANETTE MERTZ, ET AL. v. Record No. 0261-23-4 CYNTHIA SULLIVAN, ET AL. CYNTHIA SULLIVAN, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 0266-23-4
Danial Selario, etc. v. Cynthia Sullivanpublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA PUBLISHED Present: Judges Chaney, Callins and Senior Judge Humphreys Argued at Leesburg, Virginia DANETTE MERTZ, ET AL. v. Record No. 0261-23-4 CYNTHIA SULLIVAN, ET AL. CYNTHIA SULLIVAN, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 0266-23-4
State v. Devinepublic domain
164 P.3d 1009 (2007) 2007-NMCA-097 STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leslie B. DeVINE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 26,392. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. June 13, 2007. *1010 Gary K. King, Attorney General, Katherine Zinn, Assistant Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee. Templeman and
People v. Devinepublic domain
74 P.3d 440 (2003) The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Katherine Jewell DEVINE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 01CA1477. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II. February 27, 2003. Rehearing Denied April 10, 2003. Certiorari Denied August 18, 2003.[*] *442 Ken Salazar, Att
Matter of C.F. (Carlos F.)public domain
Matter of C.F. (Carlos F.) (2023 NY Slip Op 05223) Matter of C.F. (Carlos F.) 2023 NY Slip Op 05223 Decided on October 17, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law
Matter of C.F. (Carlos F.)public domain
Matter of C.F. (Carlos F.) (2023 NY Slip Op 05223) Matter of C.F. (Carlos F.) 2023 NY Slip Op 05223 Decided on October 17, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law
Devine v. Fischerpublic domain
Toomey, J. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs, Patricia Devine, Joyce Marszalkowski, and Carol Hall, are the Trustees of the Mountainshire Condominium complex in Worcester, Massachusetts. The plaintiffs seek to permanently enjoin the defendant condominium owners, Cynthia and Ernst Fischer, Richard and Claudette Alfego, Leif and Siw Kristiansson, and Mitchell and Rita Gregarczyk from displaying signs in or upon their
State of Tennessee v. Cynthia Gail Harveypublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 12, 2014 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CYNTHIA GAIL HARVEY Appeal from the Circuit Court for Humphreys County No. 11430 George C. Sexton, Judge No. M2013-02391-CCA-R3-CD - Filed October 21, 2014 The Defendant, Cynthia Gail Harvey, appeals from her Humphreys County jury conviction for felony
Ac Interests, L.P., Formerly American Coatings, L.P. v. Texas Commission on Environmental Qualitypublic domain
John P. Devine, Justice The Texas Clean Air Act provides that a person adversely affected by a Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) ruling may appeal by filing a petition in a Travis County District Court within 30 days of the ruling. TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE § 382.032(a), (b). The Act further requires serving citation on the TCEQ within 30 days of filing the petition.
in Re City of Dickinsonpublic domain
Justice Devine delivered the opinion of the Court. The issue in this original proceeding is whether a client, who testifies as an expert witness in the client's own case, waives the attorney-client privilege with respect to the client's expert testimony. Relator, the City of Dickinson, contends that email communications in the underlying litigation between attorney and client about th
Cynthia Sullivan v. Danial Selario, as Administrator of the Estate of Christopher Selario, epublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA PUBLISHED Present: Judges Chaney, Callins and Senior Judge Humphreys Argued at Leesburg, Virginia DANETTE MERTZ, ET AL. v. Record No. 0261-23-4 CYNTHIA SULLIVAN, ET AL. CYNTHIA SULLIVAN, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 0266-23-4
Matter of Amberlyn H. P. (Jose H. C.)public domain
Matter of Amberlyn H. P. (Jose H. C.) (2020 NY Slip Op 05758) Matter of Amberlyn H. P. (Jose H. C.) 2020 NY Slip Op 05758 Decided on October 14, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law
Cynthia Lynn Lowery v. Lilton Cary Lowery.public domain
Cynthia Lynn Lowery ("the wife") appeals from a judgment divorcing her from Lilton Cary Lowery ("the husband") that, among other things, awarded the parties joint legal and physical custody of their children, divided the parties' *Page 2 marital property, and did not award the wife any type of alimony or an attorney fee. The parties were married in May 1992; by the time of trial in April 2010, the parties' two sons and one daughter were 17,
R.C. v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
R.C. v City of New York (2024 NY Slip Op 03017) R.C. v City of New York 2024 NY Slip Op 03017 Decided on June 04, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department KERN, J. Published by New York State Law Reporti
People v. Cynthia N.public domain
JUSTICE COHEN delivered the opinion of the court: The State filed a petition for adjudication of wardship of the respondent mother’s four children. The petition alleged that the respondent had abused the children by creating a substantial risk of physical injury to them through other than accidental means and that the respondent had neglected them, primarily due to her use o
Charles G. Hooks, III v. Samson Lone Star, Limited Partnership, N/K/A Samson Lone Star Llcpublic domain
JUSTICE DEVINE delivered the opinion of the Court. In this oil and gas appeal, we consider whether a mineral owner’s claims of fraud *55 and breach of contract in the leasing and pooling of his mineral interests are, as a matter of law, barred by limitations. A jury determined that
Gifford v. McCarthypublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Peters, P.J. Proceedings pursuant to Executive Law § 298 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Rensselaer County) to, among other things, review a determination of respondent State Division of Human Rights finding petitioners guilty of an unlawful discriminatory practice based upon sexual orientation. Petitioners Cynthia Gifford and Robert
Gifford v. McCarthypublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Peters, P.J. Proceedings pursuant to Executive Law § 298 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Rensselaer County) to, among other things, review a determination of respondent State Division of Human Rights finding petitioners guilty of an unlawful discriminatory practice based upon sexual orientation. Petitioners Cynthia Gifford and Robert
Graphic Packaging Corp. v. Hegarpublic domain
Justice Devine delivered the opinion of the Court. *92A taxpayer that conducts business in multiple states must apportion its business revenue among the states in which it does business. For the Texas franchise tax, section 171.106 of the Tax Code provides for such apportionment under a single-factor formula, which compares the taxpayer's gross
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-04-247 CV ____________________ CYNT