Cases

MEMORANDUM *** Yeshewaget Getachew Haile, a citizen and native of Ethiopia and of Eritrean descent, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny Haile’

MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated petitions, Tarsicio Perez Trejo and Maria Luisa Medina, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) orders dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their applications for cancellation of removal (No. 05-73964), and denying their motion to reopen based on ineffective assist

MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying petitioner’s motion to reconsider. Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam

MEMORANDUM *** Yeshewaget Getachew Haile, a citizen and native of Ethiopia and of Eritrean descent, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny Haile’

MEMORANDUM ** Sihar Junjungan Siahaan, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, INS v

MEMORANDUM ** Michael Henry Bathara Hutagalung, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“U”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence

MEMORANDUM ** Hery Santoso Poerwo Soemanto, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence,

MEMORANDUM ** Fatimah Simatupang and her husband, natives and citizens of Indonesia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture *648(“CAT”). We have

SUMMARY ORDER In the two suits giving rise to this appeal, plaintiffs-appellants Kenneth Bush and Mark Smith allege that defendants-appellees terminated their employment in violation of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants on (1) December 12, 2005, 2005 WL 3371042, in the suit brought by Bush and (2) February 7, 2006, 2006 WL 297725, in the suit broug

MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying petitioner’s motion to reopen. Respondent’s opposed motion to dismiss is construed as a motion to dismiss, in part, and for summary disposition, in part. So construed, the motion is granted. We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. <

MEMORANDUM ** Jamel Abidi, a native and citizen of Tunisia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).1 We deny the petition in part and dismiss in part. (1) Abidi claims that the Immigration Judge2 e

MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated petitions, Tarsicio Perez Trejo and Maria Luisa Medina, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) orders dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their applications for cancellation of removal (No. 05-73964), and denying their motion to reopen based on ineffective assist

MEMORANDUM *** Khuldeep Singh Dhillon petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal of the Im*583migration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).1 We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order finding petitioner ineligible for cancellation of removal based on his controlled substance conviction and denying a further request for a continuance. Petitioner does not challenge the agency’s finding that he is ineligible for cancellation of removal in

MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order finding petitioner ineligible for cancellation of removal based on his controlled substance conviction and denying a further request for a continuance. Petitioner does not challenge the agency’s finding that he is ineligible for cancellation of removal in

546 F.3d 1011 (2008) Mariano GRANADOS-OSEGUERA, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent. No. 03-73030. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 17, 2006. Filed October 7, 2008. *1012 Mary Beth Canty, Laura Boyle, Josh Chetwynd, Law Students, Tucson, AZ,

MEMORANDUM * Li Jun Song, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of a final order of removal issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), which affirmed without opinion the adverse credibility determination of the Immigration Judge (“IJ”).1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we grant Song’s petition for review, vacate the BIA’s decision, a

576 F.Supp.2d 902 (2008) Fares SHALASH, Plaintiff, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, et al., Defendants. No. 07 C 298. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. September 12, 2008. *904 Kevin Andrew Raica, Azulay, Horn & Seiden, LLC, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. *905 Kurt N

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARIANO GRANADOS-OSEGUERA,  No. 03-73030 Petitioner, Agency No. v.  A091-692-353 MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney ORDER AND General, OPINION Respondent.

MEMORANDUM **** Chung Lim You (“Petitioner”), a native and citizen of South Korea, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) final order of removal. Petitioner was admitted to the United States as a lawful permanent resident (“LPR”) on or about June 23, 1996. Petitioner allegedly received a resident alien card as a result of fraud perpetrated by former Immigration and Naturalization S