Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “CURRAN v. TROWBRIDGE”
State v. Trowbridgepublic domain
[Cite as State v. Trowbridge, 2013-Ohio-1749.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : APPEAL NO. C-110541 TRIAL NO. B-1101843 Plaintiff-Appellee, : vs. :
Williams v. Statepublic domain
329 Md. 1 (1992) 616 A.2d 1275 RICKY R. WILLIAMS v. STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 7, September Term, 1992. Court of Appeals of Maryland. December 23, 1992. Thomas C. Hill (Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge, and Lori V. Gagne, on brief), Washington, D.C., for petitioner. David P. Kennedy, Asst. Atty. Gen. (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen.,
Williams v. Statepublic domain
ALPERT, Judge. In this appeal, we are asked to consider whether Maryland’s drug kingpin statute is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad, and whether the evidence used to convict the appellant was insufficient as a matter of law. For reasons that we will elaborate herein, we conclude that the statute is neither unconstitutionally vague nor overbroad, and that the evidence was sufficient to warrant submitting the case to the j
Pugh v. Statepublic domain
HOLLANDER, Judge. Dennis Pugh, appellant in No. 622, and Morgan Kelley, Jr., appellant in No. 636, were co-defendants below; they were charged with various narcotics offenses and were tried jointly by a jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Worcester County. As appellants were tried together and present common issues on appeal, we shall consider together their separately noted appeals. On January 11, 1994, t
Montgomery County v. Bradfordpublic domain
691 A.2d 1281 (1997) 345 Md. 175 MONTGOMERY COUNTY, Maryland v. Keith A. BRADFORD et al. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, Maryland v. BOARD OF SCHOOL COMMISSIONERS OF BALTIMORE CITY et al. Nos. 31 and 56, Sept. Term, 1996. Court of Appeals of Maryland. April 4, 1997. *1282 Roger W. Titus (Kevin B. Collins, Venab
Love v. City of Chi.public domain
SARA L. ELLIS, United States District Judge On July 21, 2016, Derek Love ("Derek") died after an encounter with Chicago Police Officers David Benitez, Juan Rivera, and Alfonso Herrera (collectively, the "Defendant Officers"). Derek's sister, Arlene Love, the administrator of his estate, filed this case against the Defendant Officers and the City of Chicago. In her first amended complaint, she brings wrongful death and survival claim
Marsh v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.public domain
ORDER CONCERNING DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS FRED BIERY, Chief Judge. Before the Court are Defendants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss (docket # 3), Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (docket #4), and Defendants’ Reply (docket # 5). For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds Defendants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss (docket #3) should be GRANTED. I. Background
United States v. Amtraco Commodity Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BRIEANT, District Judge. Plaintif here sues for breach of contract to recover price adjustments allegedly due the Commodity Credit Corporation (“CCC”) under four contracts with the defendant, Amtraco Commodity Corporation (“Amtraco”). These contracts govern four purchases by Amtraco from CCC of butter for export re-sale. Amtraco moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the
Commonwealth v. Dayepublic domain
Sosman, J. The defendant was convicted of deliberately premeditated murder in the first degree and unlawfully carrying a handgun. He now appeals from those convictions, as well as the denial of his motion for a new trial. On appeal, the defendant asserts error in (1) the denial of his motion to dismiss the indictments; (2) the denial of his motion to suppress an identification made at the probable cause hearing; (3) the trial ju
*666Justice Alito delivered the opinion of the Court. We granted certiorari in this case to decide whether imposing class arbitration on parties whose arbitration clauses are “silent” on that issue is consistent with the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U. S. C. § 1 et seq. I A Petitioners
Ocasio v. Ollsonpublic domain
596 F.Supp.2d 890 (2009) Edwin OCASIO and Marisol Ocasio, h/w, Plaintiffs, v. James OLLSON and Grand Rapids Transport, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 05-6219. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. January 16, 2009. *892 Kevin C. Allen, Crystle, Allen & Gimes, LLC, Lancaster, PA, for Plaintiff. Cynthia M.
Frank v. Fowlerpublic domain
Burnes, Nonnie S., J. INTRODUCTION After prevailing against the plaintiffs in a jury-waived trial before this court, the defendants sought the reasonable costs and fees arising from the defense of this action. The defendants moved pursuant to G.L.c. 261 and Mass.R.Civ.P. 54, and pursuant to G.L.c. 231, §6F. Upon consideration of the pleadings, the evidence from the jury-waived trial, and the he
Commonwealth v. Drumgoldpublic domain
O’Connor, J. A jury found the defendant guilty of murder in the first degree of Darlene Tiffany Moore (victim) with deliberate premeditation. Following the conviction, the defendant moved for a “mistrial,” which the judge properly treated as a motion for a new trial. The defendant also filed a separate motion for a new trial which raised additional issues. Both motions were denied. The defendant appeals from his conviction and fr
699 A.2d 531 (1997) 117 Md. App. 171 GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY v. The NATIONAL SOCIETY OF THE DAUGHTERS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, et al. No. 1733, September Term, 1996. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. September 4, 1997. *533 Scott T. Kragie (Stephanie A. Goldfine and Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, on th
Fuehrer v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.public domain
RULING ON DEFENDANT STANDARD ASBESTOS MANUFACTURING AND INSULATING COMPANY’S MOTION TO DISMISS BLUMENFELD, Senior District Judge. Standard Asbestos Manufacturing and Insulating Company (Standard), which has been named as a defendant in all of the cases designated as C.M.L. Groups No. 3 and No. 9, has moved the court pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2) to dismiss those actions against it for lack of personal
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND MEMORANDUM OPINION ALEXANDER L. PASKAY, Chief Judge. THIS is a confirmed Chapter 11 case, and the matter under consideration is a three-count Complaint by Captran Creditors *754Trust (CCT), Club Baha, Ltd. (Club Baha), and Tropical Properties, Ltd. (Tropical Properties) against David McConnell (McConnell), G
59 F.3d 167NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. PAN AMERICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND; County Council for MontgomeryCounty, sitting as the District Council for that
Brown v. Knowltonpublic domain
370 F.Supp. 1119 (1974) Steven F. BROWN, Plaintiff, v. Major General William KNOWLTON, Superintendent, United States Military Academy, et al., Defendants. No. 72 Civ. 3184. United States District Court, S. D. New York. February 14, 1974. Rabinowitz, Boudin & Standard, New York City, for plaintiff; Joan E. Goldberg, New York City, of counsel. Paul J. Curra
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA KOVACHEVICH, District Judge. This cause is before the Court on appeal from the Final Judgment of the Bankruptcy Court entered in this adversary proceeding in favor of appellees. Chief Bankruptcy Judge Alexander L. Paskay entered Final Judgment on April 17, 1990 upon the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Memorandum Opi
Grossman v. Mushlinpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER CONNER, District Judge: This is an action brought by three members of the Pension Committee (“Pension Committee”) of the Cornell Manufacturing Company, Inc. Employees Pension Trust to recover amounts allegedly overpaid to Sid*331ney B. Mushlin (“Mushlin”), formerly a principal of Cornell Manufacturing Company, Inc. (“Cornell”), as