Cases

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) BRYAN V. BRYAN NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). SARAH K. BRYAN, APPELLEE, V.

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 21-2835 ______________ BRYAN DAVID RANGE, Appellant v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; REGINA LOMBARDO, Acting Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives __________

HARTZ, Circuit Judge. This is the ‘second appeal in this litigation to come before this court. The first appeal involved claims by the estate of Vera Cummings (the Estate) against Community Health Systems, Inc. (CHSI) under state law, against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), and against Mountain View Regional Medical Center (Mount

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON April 5, 2017 Session CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST, INC., ET AL. v. L. M. HALEY MINISTRIES, INC., ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Chancery Court for Fayette County No. 15815 Martha B. Brasfield, Chancellor ___________________________________

FLAUM, Circuit Judge. The appellant, Martin R. Bryan, was convicted of attempted murder, rape, and confinement. On direct appeal, the Indiana Supreme Court affirmed his conviction. Bryan v. State, 438 N.E.2d 709 (Ind.1982). Bryan subsequently petitioned for habeas corpus relief, alleging that his post-arrest confession was obtained in violation of his Fifth A

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 03/22/2019 01:08 PM CDT - 977 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 301 Nebraska R eports SPARKS v. M&D TRUCKING Cite as 301 Neb. 977 Stephanie A. Sparks, Personal

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 84887-9-I Respondent, DIVISION ONE v. ORDER WITHDRAWING AND SUBSTITUTING OPINION BERNARD BELLEROUCHE, Appellant. The court has determined that it should withdraw the published opinion filed on March

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 84887-9-I Respondent, DIVISION ONE v. PUBLISHED OPINION BERNARD BELLEROUCHE, Appellant. DÍAZ, J. — A jury convicted Bernard Bellerouche of assault in the first degree and unlawful possession of a firea

860 N.E.2d 1212 (2007) Lillie RANDLES, Individually, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Seandre Aisha Lynette Randles, Deceased, and as Personal Representative of The Estate of Sean Caleb Tristen Randles, deceased, and all claimants Claiming through decedents' estates, Including Ezra Douglas, Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. INDIANA PATIENT'S COMPENSATION FUND and South Bend Memorial Hospital, Appellees-Defendants. No.

ORDER ALLEN SHARP, Chief Judge. This petitioner, Nathaniel Cummings, filed a pro se petition for relief seeking relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The return filed May 18,1987, demonstrates the necessary compliance with Lewis v. Faulkner, 689 F.2d 100 (7th Cir.1982). The state courf record has been filed and examined under the mandates of Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293, 83 S.Ct. 7

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-1395 ___________________________ Arkansas State Conference NAACP; Arkansas Public Policy Panel Plaintiffs - Appellants v. Arkansas Board of Apportionment; Sarah Huckabee Sanders, in her officia

Case: 19-14552 Date Filed: 09/03/2020 Page: 1 of 152 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-14552 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 4:18-cv-00262-MW-CAS NANCY CAROLA JACOBSON, TERENCE FLEMING, et al.,

891 F.2d 611 30 ERC 1801, 20 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,423 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON, INDIANA, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, etc., et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-2660. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued Sept. 18, 1989.Decided Dec. 6, 1989.Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied J

C.K. appeals from a judgment of the Mobile Juvenile Court modifying his child-support obligation; J.M.S. cross-appeals from that order. Because we find that the juvenile court applied the incorrect law in resolving some of the issues that the parties presented to it, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. On January 5, 1986, P.T.S. was born to J.M.S. On May 6, 1987, the Chancery Court for the First Judicial District of Hinds County, Mississippi, entered a judgment esta

8 F.3d 1132 Robert R. CUPPETT, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Jack R. DUCKWORTH,* Superintendent, IndianaState Reformatory, Respondent-Appellee. No. 89-1896. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued June 16, 1992.Reargued En Banc June 2, 1993.Decided Oct. 8, 1993.

Circuit Court for Wicomico County Case No. C-22-CR-21-000030 Argued: March 2, 2023 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MARYLAND No. 24 September Term, 2022 ______________________________________

ACCEPTED 03-14-00706-CV 4055487 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

2022 WI 60 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2018AP2205 COMPLETE TITLE: In the interest of C. G., a person under the age of 18: State of Wisconsin, Petitioner-Respondent, v. C. G., Respondent-Appellant-Petitioner.

2022 WI 60 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2018AP2205 COMPLETE TITLE: In the interest of C. G., a person under the age of 18: State of Wisconsin, Petitioner-Respondent, v. C. G., Respondent-Appellant-Petitioner.

(Slip Opinion) Revocation of Prior Monument Designations The Antiquities Act of 1906 permits a President to alter a prior declaration of a national monument, including by finding that the “landmarks,” “structures,” or “objects” identi- fied in the prior declaration either never were or no longer are deserving of the Act’s protections; and such an alteration can have the effect of eliminating entirely the reser- vation of the parcel of land previously associated with a nation