Cases

James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants' Joint Opposed Rule 12(b) Motion to Dismiss Counts 2 and 3, and to Partially Dismiss Count 1, of the Indictment, filed February 15, 2019 (Doc. 34)("Motion"). The primary issues are: (i) whether, under 18 U.S.C. § 545</

Slip Op. 24-57 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE KENT DISPLAYS, INC., Plaintiff, Before: Claire R. Kelly, Judge v. Court No. 20-00156 UNITED STATES, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER [ Granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on Kent Displays, Inc.’s claim that its imported goods are entitled to exc

Slip Op. 23-157 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE VALEO NORTH AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Before: Mark A. Barnett, Chief Judge Defendant, Court No. 21-00581 and ALUMINUM ASSOCIATION COMMON ALLOY ALUMINUM SHEET TRADE ENFORCEMENT WORKING GROUP, ET AL., Defendant-Intervenors.

Slip Op. 25-33 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE EVOLUTIONS FLOORING, INC. AND STRUXTUR, INC., Plaintiffs, and DUNHUA CITY JISEN WOOD INDUSTRY CO., LTD. ET AL., Consolidated-Plaintiffs, Before: Timothy M. Reif, Judge v. Consol. Court No. 21-00591 UNITED STATES, Defendant, and AMERICAN MANUFACTURERS OF MULTILAYERED WOOD

Slip Op. 23- UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE ROYAL BRUSH MANUFACTURING, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Before: Mark A. Barnett, Chief Judge Court No. 19-00198 Defendant, and DIXON TICONDEROGA CO., Defendant-Intervenor. OPINION [

Slip Op. 23-123 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE ASPECTS FURNITURE INTERNATIONAL, INC., Before: Jennifer Choe-Groves, Judge Plaintiff, Court No. 20-03824 v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. OPINION [Sustaining U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s Final Remand Redetermination, following an evasion determination un

Slip Op. 23-88 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE IKADAN SYSTEM USA, INC., and WEIHAI GAOSAI METAL PRODUCT CO., LTD., Plaintiffs, Before: Leo M. Gordon, Judge v. UNITED STATES, Court No. 21-00592 Defendant, and HOG SLAT, INC.,

Opinion and Order Tsoucalas, Judge: This action is before the Court, pursuant to Rule 56, on plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. The dispute arises over the classification of plaintiffs merchandise, a thin-walled wear sleeve and accompanying protective metal cup. Plaintiff argues that the proper classification is as an entirety under Schedule 6, Part 6, Subpart B

Slip Op. 20- UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE ROYAL BRUSH MANUFACTURING, INC., Plaintiff, v. Before: Mark A. Barnett, Judge UNITED STATES, Court No. 19-00198 Defendant, and DIXON TICONDEROGA CO., Defendant-Intervenor. OPINION AND ORDER [Remandin

OPINION TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge: This consolidated action comes before the court on plaintiff Appvion, Inc.’s 1 (“Appvion”) motion for judgment on the agency record challenging the United States Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) determination in Final Scope Ruling for Paper Resourc

Barnett, Judge: This action involves a challenge to a U.S. Department of Commerce ("Commerce" or the "agency") scope determination for the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the People's Republic of China, 75 Fed. Reg

OPINION FRY, Judge. {1} Appellant Hi-Country Buick GMC, Inc. (Hi-Country) appeals the Taxation and Revenue Department’s (TRD) denial of Hi-Country’s protest of the TRD’s tax assessment. The TRD assessed Hi-Country as a successor in business to High Desert Automotive in the amount of $282,910.98, including penalties and

ORDER KATHLEEN CARDONE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On this day, the Court considered Defendant Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Dollar Tree”), and Veronica Macias’s (“Macias”)1 Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion for Summary Judgment”), ECF No. 40, and Defendant and Macias’s Request for Oral Hearing on the Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion for He

OPINION EATON, Judge: At issue is the proper classification of Specialty Commodities Inc.’s (“plaintiff’) merchandise, the seeds of the Pirns ko-raiensis tree. Before thp court is plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and the cross-motion for summary judgment of the United States on behalf of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“th

700 F.Supp.2d 1055 (2010) GIRL SCOUTS OF MANITOU COUNCIL INC., Plaintiff, v. GIRL SCOUTS OF the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INC., Defendant. Case No. 08-CV-184. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. March 31, 2010. *1057 Gary W. Leydig, Riordan Fulkerson Hupert & Coleman, Chicago, IL, Tomislav Z. Kuzmanovic, Russell A. K

OPINION RIDGWAY, Judge: In this action, plaintiff Chrysal USA, Inc. (“Chrysal”) seeks to challenge the tariff classification of “flower food” which was among the various products included in 17 entries of merchandise that Chrysal imported into the United States in 2008. See generally Complaint. Chrysal invokes 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a),

ACCEPTED 03-16-00353-CV 12517627 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

942 F.Supp. 1464 (1996) BAKER'S CARPET GALLERY, INC., Plaintiff, v. MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 4:94-CV-0101-HLM. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Rome Division. September 23, 1996. *1465 *1466 *1467 Tony Glen Powers, Rog

OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge. Plaintiffs Kalimantano GmbH (“Kalimantano”), Tofik Davidoff (“Davidoff’), Konstantin Felde (“Felde”), and Johannes Schwegler (“Schwegler”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring suit against defendants Motion in Time, Inc. (“MIT”), Eddie Shamayev (“Eddie”), Michael Shamayev (“Michael”), Boris Shamayev (“Boris”), and David Shamayev (“David”) (co

530 F.Supp.2d 486 (2007) WORLD WRESTLING ENTERTAINMENT, INC., Plaintiff, v. JAKKS PACIFIC, INC., Jakks Pacific (H.K.) Ltd., Road Champs Ltd., THQ, Inc., THQ/Jakks Pacific LLC, Stanley Shenker & Assocs., Inc., Bell Licensing, L.L.C., Jack Friedman, Stephen Berman, Joel Bennett, Brian Farrell, Stanley Shenker, and James Bell, Defendants. No. 04-CV-8223 (KMK). United States District Court, S.D. New Yo