⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

11 opinions for “CPW America Co. v. United States”

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2025-09-08 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 23-2094 Document: 59 Page: 1 Filed: 09/08/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CORINTH PIPEWORKS PIPE INDUSTRY SA, CPW AMERICA CO., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. UNITED STATES, THE AMERICAN LINE PIPE PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION TRADE COMMITTEE, Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2023-2094
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015-08-25 · Published · cited 57× · 798 F.3d 1281; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 15027; 2015 WL 5011174
*1287 PER CURIAM. In this appeal, the court affirms on all issues. This disposition is addressed in two opinions: one by Judge Matheson and one by Judge Bacharach. Parts I and II(A)-(D) of Judge Matheson’s opinion represent the unanimous opinion of the court. There, the court a
United States Court of International Trade · 2023-04-28 · Published · cited 1× · 633 F. Supp. 3d 1314; 2023 CIT 65
Slip Op. 23-65 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE CORINTH PIPEWORKS PIPE INDUSTRY SA and CPW AMERICA CO., Plaintiffs, v. Before: Leo M. Gordon, Judge UNITED STATES, Defendant, Court No. 22-00063 and THE AMERICAN LINE PIPE PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION TRADE COMMITTEE,
District Court, E.D. New York · 2013-07-31 · Published · cited 32× · 978 F. Supp. 2d 148; 2013 WL 3967119
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On March 30, 2011, the Plaintiff Charles Evans (the “Plaintiff’) commenced this action against the Defendant United States of America (the “Defendant”). The Plaintiff asserts negligence claims pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671 (“the FTCA”), and § 5102 of New York State’s No-Fault Insurance Law (“N.Y. Ins. Law” or the “No-Fault L
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999-02-26 · Published · cited 34× · 169 F.3d 136; 51 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 94; 83 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1040; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 3129
169 F.3d 136 83 A.F.T.R.2d 99-1040, 99-1 USTC P 50,298 UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,v.David A. ACKERT, Respondent-Appellee,Paramount Communications, Inc. (now Viacom International,Inc.), CPW Investments Ltd., CPW Holdings, Inc., NieuOranjestad Partnership, Nieuw Oranjestad Partnership andMaarten Investerings Partnership,Intervenors-Defendants-Appellees-Cross-
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999-02-26 · Published · cited 44× · 169 F.3d 136
LEVAL, Circuit Judge: The United States of America appeals from a decision of the district court (William I. Garfinkel, Magistrate Judge) in a tax summons enforcement proceeding, barring the Internal Revenue Service from questioning Respondent David A. Ackert, an investment banker, about his conversations with Paramount Corporation’s counsel, by reason of Paramount’s attorney-client privilege. We reverse.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2019-03-07 · Published · cited 2× · 597 B.R. 543
MARTIN GLENN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Pending before the Court is the motion ("Motion," ECF Doc. # 8), filed on behalf of Kossoff & Kossoff LLP and its principal Irwin Kossoff (collectively, "Defendants"), to dismiss the amended complaint ("Complaint," ECF Doc. # 3). James S. Feltman (the "Trustee") filed an opposition to the Motion ("Opposition," ECF Doc. # 10) and Defendants filed a reply. ("Reply," ECF Doc. # 12.) For
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2013-02-28 · Published · cited 25× · 488 B.R. 205
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS ERIK P. KIMBALL, Bankruptcy Judge. THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Lawrence Duprey’s and Vishnu Ramlogan’s Motion to Dismiss Count I of the Adversary Complaint or, Alternatively, for Abstention [ECF No. 174] (the “Motion to Dismiss”) filed by Lawrence Duprey and Vishnu Ramlogan1 (together, the “Defe
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009-07-22 · Published · cited 4× · 212 P.3d 941; 221 Ariz. 603
212 P.3d 941 (2009) AIDA RENTA TRUST; AKT Joint Venture; Alchemedes Boulder Creek Limited Partnership; Alta Place Arizona Limited Partnership; Alta Vista Apartments; America First Tax Exempt Mortgage Fund 2 L.P.; Amigon Strategic Investments; Anancosta Apartments, Inc.; Anasazi Terrace Condominiums U.S. Limited Partnership; AP Pebble Creek Limited Partnership; Arabian Trails Associates; Arabian Trails Development Partners; Aram II Investment Company; Arb
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2014-03-11 · Published · cited 2× · 508 B.R. 345; 2014 Bankr. LEXIS 932; 2014 WL 954124
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION THOMAS J. CATLIOTA, Bankruptcy Judge. Debtor Neogenix Oncology, Inc. (“Neo-genix” or the “Debtor”), with the support of the Official Committee of Equity Security Holders (the “Committee”), seeks confirmation of its plan of liquidation. Judy A. Robbins, the United States Trustee (“UST”), objects to confirmation. The court previously ruled that the Debtor established all el
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000-02-01 · Published · cited 4× · 3 P.3d 1142; 197 Ariz. 222
3 P.3d 1142 (2000) 197 Ariz. 222 AIDA RENTA TRUST: AKT Joint Venture; Alchemedes Boulder Creek Limited Partnership; Alta Place Arizona Limited Partnership; Alta Vista Apartments; American First Tax Exempt Mortgage Fund 2 L.P.; Amigon Strategic Investments; Anancosta Apartments, Inc.; Anasazi Terrace Condominiums, U.S. Limited Partnership; Arabian Trails Development Partners; Aram II Investment Company; Arboleda Investment, L.L.C.;