⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

10 opinions for “COTTMAN TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, LLC v. KERSHNER”

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008-03-03 · Published · cited 5× · 536 F. Supp. 2d 543; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16703; 2008 WL 583894
536 F.Supp.2d 543 (2008) COTTMAN TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, LLC et al., Plaintiffs, v. Dale KERSHNER et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 05-6369. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 3, 2008. *544 *545 *546 Alan Poliner, James Goniea, Aamco Tr
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007-06-22 · Published · cited 5× · 492 F. Supp. 2d 461; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45997; 2007 WL 1815685
492 F.Supp.2d 461 (2007) COTTMAN TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, LLC, et al. v. Dale KERSHNER, et al. Civil Action No. 05-6369. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. June 22, 2007. *462 *463 *464 Alan Poliner, James Goniea, AAMCO Transmissions, Inc., Willi
District Court, N.D. California · 2008-12-29 · Published · cited 4× · 625 F. Supp. 2d 872; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105689; 2008 WL 5411500
625 F.Supp.2d 872 (2008) Joseph BENCHARSKY et al., Plaintiffs, v. COTTMAN TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, LLC; American Driveline Systems, Inc.; and Does 1-50, Defendants. No. C 08-03402 SI. United States District Court, N.D. California. December 29, 2008. *874 Peter Clark Lagarias, Esq., Robert Samuel Boulter, Lagarias & Boulter, LLP,
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018-04-10 · Published · cited 5× · 305 F. Supp. 3d 605
Rufe, District Judge Plaintiff Matthew Kershner brings this action against Defendants Komatsu Ltd. and related entities1 alleging he suffered serious injuries in an accident involving a Komatsu bulldozer. Defendants filed a motion to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania.2 For the reasons set forth below, the Court w
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019-03-27 · Published · cited 4× · 377 F. Supp. 3d 506
David Stewart Cercone, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Premier Comp Solutions, LLC ("Premier" or "Plaintiff"), initiated this action by filing a seven (7) count Amended Complaint against Defendants, UPMC ("UPMC"), UPMC Benefit Management Services, Inc. ("UPMC-BMS"), UPMC Health Benefits, Inc.1 ("UPMC-HB") (collectively the "UPMC Defendants"), and
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014-06-17 · Published · cited 21× · 26 F. Supp. 3d 407; 2014 WL 2765088; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82763
MEMORANDUM OPINION TUCKER, Chief Judge. This is a civil RICO action. Plaintiff Karen Sarpolis initiated this action against nine defendants1 for conspiracy to “devalue” and “derail” Plaintiffs settlement in a medical malpractice action in state court. Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint asserts four, causes of action for conspiracy in violation of Pennsylvania state
California Court of Appeal · 2008-06-17 · Published · cited 25× · 164 Cal. App. 4th 1312; 80 Cal. Rptr. 3d 275; 2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 1070
164 Cal.App.4th 1312 (2008) JOSHUA W. BRACK, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. OMNI LOAN COMPANY, LTD., et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. D049198. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One. June 17, 2008. *1316 Majors & Fox, Frank J. Fox, Lawrence J. Salisbury, Steven T. Wlodek; Law Office of Mary A. Lehma
District Court, District of Columbia · 2009-08-21 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) MOBILE SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS, ) INC. d/b/a PITTSBURGH INTERNATIONAL ) TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2009-08-21 · Published · cited 3× · 646 F. Supp. 2d 124; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74579; 2009 WL 2569777
646 F.Supp.2d 124 (2009) MOBILE SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. d/b/a Pittsburgh International Telecommunications, Inc., Plaintiff, v. INTELSAT USA SALES CORP., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-0436 (ESH). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 21, 2009. *127 Stephen J. Vaughan, Gray Plant Mooty Mooty &a;
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007-12-04 · Published · cited 4× · 525 F. Supp. 2d 952; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88831; 2007 WL 4258176
525 F.Supp.2d 952 (2007) CARETOLIVE, Plaintiff, v. Andrew von ESCHENBACH, et al., Defendants. No. 2:07-cv-729. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. December 4, 2007. *953 *954 *955 *956 Kerry M. Don