⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “COMPLETE CARTAGE, LLC”

Appellate Court of Illinois · 2022-12-30 · Published · cited 5× · 225 N.E.3d 632; 2022 IL App (1st) 211403
2022 IL App (1st) 211403 No. 1-21-1403 Opinion filed December 30, 2022 SIXTH DIVISION IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT SET ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.,
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012-03-20 · Published · cited 29× · 727 S.E.2d 291; 219 N.C. App. 429; 2012 WL 924806; 2012 N.C. App. LEXIS 401
727 S.E.2d 291 (2012) BEST CARTAGE, INC., Plaintiff, v. STONEWALL PACKAGING, LLC, and Jackson Paper Manufacturing Company, Defendants, and GGG, Inc. d/b/a Grisanti, Galef and Goldress as Receiver for Stonewall Packaging, LLC, Defendant-Intervenor. No. COA11-1153. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. March 20, 2012. *295 Carrut
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018-05-10 · Published · cited 12× · 912 N.W.2d 35; 381 Wis. 2d 349; 2018 WI 46
ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J. *353¶ 1 The petitioner, Capital Cartage, Inc. (Capital Cartage), seeks review of an unpublished decision of the court of appeals affirming the circuit court's determination that real estate broker Mark McNally (McNally) is entitled to a commission pursuant to the listing contract between the parties.1
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2012-10-24 · Published · cited 3× · 429 Md. 199; 55 A.3d 510; 2012 Md. LEXIS 681
McDonald, J. Maryland law has traditionally categorized grants of easements as either general or specific. The difference between the two is that the granting deed of a general easement does not describe the precise location of the easement whereas the granting deed of a specific easement does. In this case, we are asked to decide on the existence and possible means of locating a general easement that provides a right-of-way f
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016-03-09 · Published · cited 3× · 168 F. Supp. 3d 1074; 2016 WL 890699; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29904
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER John J. Tharp, Jr., United States District Judge American Transport Group (ATG), a property broker, sued two warehousing and logistics providers, defendants California Cartage Company (CCC) and Pacorini Metals, for the loss of two shipments of copper cathodes. ATG claims that the defendants negligently handled the loads, causing them to be lost or stolen rather than released t
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011-11-30 · Published · cited 16× · 32 A.3d 88; 202 Md. App. 138; 2011 Md. App. LEXIS 155
32 A.3d 88 (2011) 202 Md. App. 138 USA CARTAGE LEASING, LLC v. Todd A. BAER, et al. No. 1797, September Term, 2009. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. November 30, 2011. *96 G. Randall Whittenberger (Miles & Stockbridge PC, on the brief), Frederick, MD, for Appellant. James W. Stone (Miller,
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2012-06-14 · Published · cited 20× · 375 S.W.3d 337; 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 4739; 2012 WL 2154501
OPINION WILLIAM J. BOYCE, Justice. Custom Transit, L.P., Custom Operations, LLC, and Richway Cartage, Inc., appeal from a judgment in favor of Flat-rolled Steel, Inc. following a jury trial. We affirm the trial court’s judgment as to contract damages and attorney’s fees awarded against Custom Transit and Custom Operations. We reverse
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2018-06-12 · Published · cited 1× · 2017 IL App (1st) 160780
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007-03-28 · Published · cited 0× · 227 S.W.3d 580; 2007 Tenn. App. LEXIS 169
227 S.W.3d 580 (2007) INTERMODAL CARTAGE COMPANY, INC. v. Timothy CHERRY, et al. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, at Nashville. November 16, 2006 Session. March 28, 2007. *581 James M. Simpson, Heather W. Fletcher, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Intermodal Cartage Company, Inc. Fred Steltemier, Franklin, Tennessee, f
Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2006-03-10 · Published · cited 28× · 188 S.W.3d 440; 2006 Ky. App. LEXIS 78; 2006 WL 572816
188 S.W.3d 440 (2006) Patricia REECE; and Willard David Reece, Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. DIXIE WAREHOUSE AND CARTAGE COMPANY, n/k/a Dixie Warehouse and Cartage Company, LLC, Appellee/Cross-Appellant. Nos. 2004-CA-000652-MR, 2004-CA-000682-MR. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. March 10, 2006. *442 Freeda M. Clark, Louisville, KY,
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007-03-28 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 16, 2006 Session INTERMODAL CARTAGE COMPANY, INC. v. TIMOTHY CHERRY, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 02-2651-II Carol McCoy, Chancellor No. M2005-01635-COA-R3-CV - Filed on March 28, 2007 This case concerns an employment agreement entere
North Carolina Business Court · 2022-06-20 · Published · cited 0× · 2022 NCBC 29
Harris v. Ten Oaks Mgmt. LLC, 2022 NCBC 29. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION MECKLENBURG COUNTY 21 CVS 13907 JORDAN HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND OPINION ON PARTIAL MOTION TO TEN OAKS MANAGEMENT, LLC; DISMISS AMENDED
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012-09-26 · Published · cited 0× · 207 Md. App. 666; 53 A.3d 509; 2012 Md. App. LEXIS 119
LAWRENCE F. RODOWSKY (Retired, Specially Assigned), J. Presented here is a declaratory judgment action seeking construction of an easement. The servient estate is owned by Montgomery County, Maryland (the County) and is the subject of a General Development Agreement (the Agreement) between the County and the plaintiff-appellant, Michael, LLC (Michael). The dominant estate is owned by the defendantappellee, 8204 Associates Limi
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2020-12-23 · Published · cited 0× · 2020 IL App (1st) 173163
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2020-12-23 · Published · cited 8× · 2020 IL App (1st) 173163
2020 IL App (1st) 173163 THIRD DIVISION December 23, 2020 No. 1-17-3163 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018-11-14 · Published · cited 11× · 908 F.3d 1075
Hamilton, Circuit Judge. Richard Bell brought a copyright infringement lawsuit against Vacuforce, LLC, accusing it of publishing his photograph of the Indianapolis skyline on its website without a license. Vacuforce hired attorney Paul Overhauser to defend it. The parties quickly settled, so the federal lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice. That was not the end o
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017-07-06 · Published · cited 0× · 570 B.R. 70; 2017 Bankr. LEXIS 1898; 64 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 89
MEMORANDUM OPINION DEBORAH L. THORNE, UNITED .STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Before the court is the disputed election of chapter 7 trustee Patrick J. O’Malley. Under 11 U.S.C. § 702(b), Fund Recovery Services, LLC elected O’Malley over the objections of the interim trustee and two insider creditors. As explained below, the court finds that Fund Recovery Sendees was ineligible to vote because its interest is materi
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016-05-16 · Published · cited 5× · 194 So. 3d 1149; 2015 La.App. 4 Cir. 0615; 2016 WL 2851551; 2016 La. App. LEXIS 953
LANDRIEU, Judge. | ^Defendants, S its insurer, The Hartford Insurance Co., and Hand Construction, LLC (“Hand Construction”), appeal the November 19, 2014 judgment of the Office of Workers’ . Compensation (“OWC”) in favor of claimant, Johan Fernandez, On July 12, 2013, claimant filed a disputed claim for compensation in the OWC, alleging that he suffered
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016-09-28 · Published · cited 3× · 202 So. 3d 1044; 2015 La.App. 4 Cir. 1323; 2016 La. App. LEXIS 1788
Judge Terri F. Love 11 Plaintiff was injured in a motor vehicle accident while in the course and scope of his employment. This appeal arises from *1047the dispute regarding his entitlement to disability benefits and penalties before and after he accepted an unauthorized third party settlement. Prior to the workers’ compensation court’s ruling, the employer filed a
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2021-06-08 · Published · cited 16× · 2021 WI 52
2021 WI 52 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2019AP130 COMPLETE TITLE: Southport Commons, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Defendant-Respondent. REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS