Cases

166 Mich. App. 772 (1988) 421 N.W.2d 289 FORMALL, INC v. COMMUNITY NATIONAL BANK OF PONTIAC Docket No. 95938. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March 7, 1988. Rickel, Earle & Wokas (by Donald L. Bramlage, Jr.), for plaintiffs Charles W. Jones and David J. Forshee. Bodman, Longley & Dahling (by Kenneth R

138 Mich. App. 588 (1984) 360 N.W.2d 902 FORMALL, INC. v. COMMUNITY NATIONAL BANK Docket No. 71848. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided November 5, 1984. Rickel, Earle & Wokas (by Donald L. Bramlage, Jr.), for plaintiffs. Bodman, Longley & Dahling (by Kenneth R. Lango and Larry R. Shulman), for

159 Mich. App. 510 (1987) 407 N.W.2d 31 COMMUNITY NATIONAL BANK OF PONTIAC v. MICHIGAN BASIC PROPERTY INSURANCE ASSOCIATION Docket No. 85682. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided April 21, 1987. Bodman, Longley & Dahling (by James J. Walsh and Robert J. Diehl, Jr.), for plaintiff. *5

ORDER JOAN N. ERICKSEN, District Judge. Plaintiff Sherry Toomey is a resident of Minnesota. Defendant Keith Dahl is a resident of Alaska. Plaintiff and Defendant were allegedly romantically and professionally involved from 2003 until 2014. Plaintiff filed a lawsuit in state court alleging misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, promissory estop-pel, unjust enrichment, and conversi

Opinion O’LEARY, P. J. Brent Beckwith appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained without leave to amend Susan Dahl’s demurrer to his complaint alleging intentional interference with an expected inheritance (IIEI) and deceit by false promise. Beckwith argues we should join the majority of other states in recognizing the tort of IIEI as a valid cause of action.1

WRIGHT-PADILLA, J., Appellant, Wesley Cascone, appeals from this court’s order denying his motion to set aside sheriff’s sale. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY This case commenced May 31,2013, with the filing of the US Bank National Association, as Trustee’s (“appellee”)1 tax claim seeking to sell the premises of 2021 East Susquehanna Avenue, Philadelphia,

Proceedings: (In Chambers:) DEFENDANT JOHNSON’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (filed 8/5/2011) DEFENDANT POPULOUS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (filed 8/5/2011) CHRISTINA A. SNYDER, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On April 9, 2008, plaintiffs Executive Security Management, Inc., d/b/a The APEX Group (“Apex”), and Contemporary Services Corporation (“CSC”) filed the instant

WILLIAM E. MILLER, District Judge. On May 12, 1959, Manufacturers National Bank of Detroit, Michigan (hereinafter referred to as “Manufacturers Bank”), made written application to the Comptroller of the Currency of the United States (hereinafter referred to as the “Comptroller”) for permission to establish a branch office in the vicinity of Woodward Avenue and Big Beaver Road, Bloomfield Township, Oakland County, Michigan. O

192 F.Supp. 514 (1961) COMMUNITY NATIONAL BANK OF PONTIAC, a National Banking Association, Plaintiff, v. Ray M. GIDNEY, as Comptroller of the Currency of the United States, and Manufacturers National Bank of Detroit, a National Banking Association, Defendants. Civ. No. 19383. United States District Court E. D. Michigan, S. D. March 10, 1961. Clarence K. Patterson, P

Opinion by JUDGE BERGER ~ 1 In this securities fraud action, the district court denied the motion of defendants, Williams S. Lyons, Jr., and Williams S. Lyons, III (collectively, Lyons), to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Lyons contended that claims against them under the Colorado Securities Act (CSA) were subject to the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act (CGIA) and therefore barred because th

868 A.2d 574 (2005) DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL COMPANY, as Custodian or Trustee f/k/a Bankers Trust Company of California, N.A., Appellee, v. Darrell O. BUTLER and Barbara June Butler. Appeal of: Philip Stout, t/d/b/a County Development. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued October 26, 2004. Filed February 7, 2005. *575 David S

244 P.3d 835 (2010) 239 Or. App. 495 Katrina D. SON, as personal representative for the Estate of Sara Joy Burnson, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant Cross-Respondent, v. ASHLAND COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE SERVICES, dba Ashland Community Hospital, Defendant, and Paul Rostykus, MD; and John Delgado, MD, Defendants-Respondents Cross-Appellants. 051623L3; A137065. Court of Appeals of Ore

TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND.....................................675 II. LEGAL ANALYSIS........................................................677 A. Motions To. Dismiss.........................................'...........677 1. Want of prosecution...............................................678 2. Insufficiency of service.............

*20 Opinion BORDEN, J. The primary issue in this appeal is whether, for the purposes of General Statutes (Rev. to 1993) § 36-498 (c) of the Connecticut Uniform Securities Act (CUSA),1 a bank can be the agent of a person who is hable for fraudulent conduct in connection with a securities transaction under § 36-498 (a).

349 S.W.3d 738 (2011) EPERNAY COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant, v. Saad SHAAR and Jeanette Shaar, Appellees. No. 14-09-01026-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). August 25, 2011. *740 William G. Gammon, Robert V. North, Houston, for appellant. Jeffrey R. Singer, Julia Kurtz Dean, Sugarland, for appell

787 F.2d 985 Blue Sky L. Rep. P 72,383, 54 USLW 2554,Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,700 Maurice DAHL, Gary Clark, W. Grantham, Robert Daniele,Charles Dahl, Dowayne Bockman, Ray Dilbeck, Richard Koon,Art Overgarrd, Jack Yeager, Accra Tronics Seals Corp., andAaron Heller, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Billy J. "B.J." PINTER, Black Gold Oil Company, PinterEnergy Company, and Pinter Oil Company,Defendants

HOLLANDER, Judge. Appellants, James and Mary Kiley, sued appellee, First National Bank of Maryland (the “Bank”), in a multi-count complaint filed in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County. The Kileys sought compensatory and punitive damages stemming from the Bank’s alleged breach of contract and tortious misconduct. The gravamen of appellants’ various causes of action centers on their contentions that the Bank improperly att

ROBERT MADDEN HILL, Circuit Judge: In this appeal Pinter1 urges that his liability under section 12(1) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77/(1), and article 33 A(l) of the Texas Securities Act, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 581-33 A(l) (Vernon Supp. 1986), should be diminished by plaintiff Maurice Dahl’s wrongful conduct. We disagree with this contention and affirm the decision of the dis

REYNOLDS, Chief Justice. The litigants have perfected three separate appeals from individual judgments rendered in three suits filed in different district courts of Dallas County and consolidated for trial before a jury. The appeals, involving a number of interrelated subject matters, were submitted together, and this opinion sets forth the rationale upon which we have rendered a judgment in each cause. P

SAMUEL, Judge. Donald E. Dahl, a real estate broker, instituted this suit against the defendant bank for the sum of $7,232.69, representing $6,280 allegedly due him as a real estate commission under a written agreement to purchase real estate and $952.69 as a result of overpayment of an indebtedness. The bank answered denying liability and avert*580ing- that, insofar